Shankara vs Secularism || Project SHIVOHAM

Christianity (The New Testament) quasi breaks the covenant the ‘tribe’ had with God under the (Old Testament). Christianity was warped by the Vatican (which is when we see Gov’t use religion for control) and that battle continued thru Europe and the monarchies. The U.S. was founded by Protestants/Free Masons - seeking religious freedom to worship without Gov’t control, (albeit with issues of greed and colonialism). “In God we Trust”, but the past required the separation of Church and State. True ‘Christianity’, (not the kind that if you believe you are saved which is prevalent), is founded on LOVE (bhakti). It is the former philosophy, that again warps the tradition into a separatist stance of “us vs. them”…..and it is this stance that fosters a hidden agenda to gain control/power under the guise of caring for others in order to bolster itself at the expense of those it claims to serve (present day democracy in the U.S.). True Christianity, (Gnostic like) before being warped by politics in essence purports to toss out all the rules and just LOVE. LOVE is pluralistic. Pure LOVE is accepting, pluralistic, inclusive and freedom loving. (I might wonder why India chose to use a recognized Diety’s words as an ad campaign to promote a questionable vaccine to it’s neighbors - I wonder if as in the U.S. diplomatic profit was involved and marketed under the guise of caring?)

Pranamamulu, what a documentary, very thought provoking for the present and understand what is meant by sanata dharma in Bharat

If a shallow word like Secularism non aligned to Indian philosophy can be added, it should also be removed .

I don't know about ancient times, but Secularism is a joke now in India. Seculars in India are the most misogynistic people I have ever met.

I'm fascinated by how important religion is throughout human history, and in today's current events more than many realize or want to admit. It seems the leading powers in the world are trying to play out abrahamic faiths end time prophecies.
Even those who don't seem religious are pandering to the religious extremists.

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🕉️🕉️🕉️

excellent video

Good informative video. Would have shared but the last bit on vax incriptions is a poor example. Follow the money and find the foreign hand in organiszing, staging , terrorizing and handing out premeditated solutions here. 4 years ago suddenly a so called virus was bigger than Brahman. How easily everyone forgot! Bharat succumbed hook line and sinker worse than anyother country.

Wow! Thank you❤❤❤

If secularism is simply a subset of pluralism, what's the debate exactly? I am confused.

We have too many brown sahebs who subscribe to the western notion of Secularism.
Unfortunate reality is that these saheb communists speak ill of the religion/culture they we're born into!
Wish things will be better for the future generations!
Hari OM
💮

Jayatu Sanatan
Jayatu Shankara🚩

Highly casteist

Secularism is an animal. No secularism.
Support Pluralism 👍👍👍

Aum Sanaatana dharma greatest Bharath desh samskruti and sanskaar.....
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Any sensible person with an Iota of brain and capable of thought can't Waive off this _ / \ _ /\ _ / \ _

you are projecting Advaita like the sole Dharma of Bharata

Secular Hindu is oxymoron….4 varnas …justice based on varnas…brainwashing might help some part of India…truth shall make you free. Sankara is not at all foe secularism…

This more Monism vs Dualism.

This happened several years ago during a college excursion with a stopover to an ancient Hindu temple. At the threshold one of our Muslim student was prohibited from entering. This has happened many times in Big n Famous Hindu temple.
Popular is when Yesudas was prevented from Guruvayor temple.
It is now 2024 but such laws continue…

Thank you, brother! ...... Martin from South Africa 🙏

I am still searching a superior word to appreciate you. My small brain couldn't find above the word EXCELLENT.

I m from Kerala Born place of adishankaracharya❤

Excellent job.

Nice.

Why there's only 75k views...?
Everyone should share this video

Also worth noting, the word Secularism is not in original constitution. That word was added, during emergency period

Behen ke laude aaj jo 4 math le Shankaracharya hein wo log intercaste marriage ke khilaf hein, unn behen ke lodon ko uss positions se uthao

Secularism word should be uplifted from india's constitution

The problem is indian central or state govts are not secular... It separates people in the name of minority by differentiating religion... Minority law is corrupted by religious racism...govt/court needs to reevaluate whom to put in minority basket

In Bharat also Abrahamic philosophy was there like Dvait in which equating a human-being with God is blasphemous and strictly forbidden. Advait is the Dharmic philosophy.

जगदगुरु श्री आदि शंकराचार्य महाराज कि जय ।।🙏

Not a secular fool but a great sanatan hindu ✅👏🙏💐👌🇮🇳📢📣🕉🚩❤

Thank you

Shankaram loka shankaram ❣️

Advaitam! ❤

Wah...what a profound perception of Secularism being explained with Dharmic Pluralism and Abrahamic singularism 🙏🙏 truly and intricately observed and explained. AND YES ... ITS UnfortunatE NOW THIS IS WIDELY ...Manipulated FOR Political GAINS

Not allowing people of other castes in some temples is because of the cruel history of india where thousands of temples were distroyed by these people to prove their toxic religious philosophy of killing people who dont worship their god. One of many examples is the Nalanda University. So much knowledge was burned for nights there. India has always been the country to welcome every human no matter their caste in their temples as well as their houses treating them as gods, अतिथि देवो भव: and they have faced countless of these mishappenings just because they dont follow their religion. In the end, todays temples who don't allow the people of other caste, makes a lot of sense

Recently I have listened to several of your videos . They are good. Keep it up. Just wanted to let you know that please correct your pronunciation of the word "Brahman" you repeatedly and emphatically say "bhramman" (भ्र म्म न , LOL) that ticks me off . I try my best to ignore it and pay attention to main content . But that word appears so frequently in your narration that my focus diverts many a times. Say it Bra-h-man" ब्र -ह -म -न ==ब्रह्मन .

Barath should change to hindu rasthra

Dismental

Secularism was introduced in India and in the constitution to make way for abrahamic faiths primarly Islam. End of argument.

Basically both pluralism and secularism have their place. Secularism is a good way to protect pluralism by preventing a power grab by one or another religion thus protecting pluralism. It is very easy to fall into: "we support everybody except ..." trap.

By far one of your best, thoughtful, though provoking & simple message doc film🙏🏻

👍

Thanks

You have answered the question. What do we do in practical life do we follow our scriptures? We should be pluralistic but can we be, ? With our level of education can we really put our scriptural advice into practice? It will take a lot of time. No government has that time,. They must win elections every five years. Be voted to power by people who have no idea about anything that you have said.

Shankara and secularism are ideas, its a good debate for understading which one is better, but which one would be better to implement is a whole another debate, what you're discussing the video is idealism, shankara philosophy if came into the enforcement it will lead to one religion being used by the politicians from their own gain. If the politician are not able to adhere to secularism then how can you think that they would be able to do that with Shankara? It will just lead to politicians using to to win the elections. I don't understand why are you even against conversions? what is a conversion? some one believing or resonation with a different philosophy, what that is supported by shankara, how can you say that you believe in shankara and not allow someone to follow their faith? Id you did your research you would have that Islam does not propagate into the killing of non Muslims just because they are not Muslims. I felt amazed a scholarly person like you would make a statement like that in your video that Abrahamic faiths as in Islam propagate that. And what you said secularism wasn't actuate as well. It wasn't established in a place were there were only Christian. Yes, they were Christian but they had different believe regarding the nature of Jesus(AS) which lead the centuries of blood shed. Maybe you should make a video on why you should one should never try to preach their religious philosophies to anyone. The religion that you're preaching was once spread though preaching as well.

Please tell me in Telugu language sir