Комментарии:
yolo
ОтветитьWhy can you not place your own words/ideas (maybe even slightly tweaked) into a witness(s) mouth? Sounds like those certain examinations are riddled with leading questions. Then again, I'm an under-grad pre-law major. If anyone can help with this question it'd be great! Nice video btw, Mr.EmoryLaw
ОтветитьSo in a criminal defense trial.
You would paint the picture of the Complainant in an assault case the bad guy by showing his intent (Menes Rhea) to Trespass, intimidate and provoke?
Then show the defendant as one who was taking action to prevent bodily harm?
Thanks
Excellent.
Ответитьand the truth does not matter,
ОтветитьThank you. It answered some questions I had. BG
ОтветитьThanks.
ОтветитьRidiculous I have been trying to get into court for over an hour
ОтветитьYou. Are. Wonderful!
ОтветитьThank u
ОтветитьGreat info. However, 1st person is "I". "She" is 3rd person. Maybe the presenter meant present tense?
ОтветитьThanks for educating us
ОтветитьI salute you , thank you🙏
ОтветитьThank you ❤️
ОтветитьThanks 😊
Ответитьthank you i have learn a lot about closing and opening statement in court cases
ОтветитьLaw or equity ? Which venue is it ? Have all received full disclosure, and oaths on the record first ? Oh; consumer goods ?
ОтветитьThis guy is presenting techniques which can be used by either side. The problem is, if the prosecution uses these techniques, then they're testifying. That is illegal, it violates the defendants due process, and violates many of his civil rights.
He makes a couple of good points. But overall, you can disregard the rest. Anytime a prosecutor attempts to give an opening statement, he is considered to be testifying.