Supersymmetry, explained visually

Supersymmetry, explained visually

ScienceClic English

2 года назад

379,563 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@childrenofbodom33333
@childrenofbodom33333 - 29.01.2024 12:36

Ive never heard an english person pronounce a french word with such perfection (point carré symmetry)

Ответить
@Darksnowwwww
@Darksnowwwww - 19.01.2024 06:49

Amazing amazing video.

Ответить
@mohsenaghdam3136
@mohsenaghdam3136 - 17.01.2024 23:24

In this video every minute I get more confused 😅😂 Nice job 🤘🏽

Ответить
@mohammedalmalky5044
@mohammedalmalky5044 - 17.01.2024 10:46

The simplest and clearest I have ever come across. Thanks!

Ответить
@Mango_Juice581
@Mango_Juice581 - 14.01.2024 00:20

I feel like the change in a superspace plane is experienced as time. Always felt like I was moving forward but not moving

Ответить
@carloseduardodiazjaramillo9848
@carloseduardodiazjaramillo9848 - 11.01.2024 03:05

Supersymmetry is however not existent in current experimental data. One has to break it explicitly to agree with current observations. This leads to an unbelievably high number of free parameters: predictability is lost and any model that uses supersymmetry becomes scientifically useless.

Ответить
@boonraypipatchol7295
@boonraypipatchol7295 - 10.01.2024 16:44

Quantum information, Quantum entanglement,
Are, fundamental, underlying of Reality.
Quantum Mind emerge.. Collection, Pattern of QuInfo and QuEntang.
Quantum Body emerge.. Std.Model emerge, DNA, Protein synthesis.
Mind and Body entanglement.. Consciousness emerge.
Spacetime emerge.. Mass.. Energy.. Wave fn. Decoherence.
Mathematics Emerge.. Intrinsic in the fabric of the emergence.
Holographic principal..information Conservation, Energy conservation.

Ответить
@ShivamVerma-hg2iv
@ShivamVerma-hg2iv - 30.12.2023 08:56

Sir You have talked about supersymmetry correspond to super space.
So we can think of super time what it is if not why?

Ответить
@Xand4yay
@Xand4yay - 27.12.2023 20:36

I’m in love with science and learning about all of them

Ответить
@acuddlypuppie7928
@acuddlypuppie7928 - 25.12.2023 22:52

I like this channel. However, to call string theory "very promising" is just absolutely absurd.

Ответить
@guamitoe-
@guamitoe- - 24.12.2023 15:54

This video makes me think I’m looking in the right direction.

I’ve always asked myself, what if the universe being a frequency in the quantum level is the reason why our math doesn’t work. Because over time, the symmetries of the universe break down; and the fundamentals of physics inevitably change throughout large distances and time.

Idfk, I’m losing my mind here guys

Ответить
@chandlerbing5437
@chandlerbing5437 - 20.12.2023 10:00

Very informative❤

Ответить
@Hansulf
@Hansulf - 13.12.2023 17:36

Why does the superparticles not being detected means they are heavier? Shouldn't it be the other way around? If they have more maws, they carry more energy, right?

Ответить
@user-mm9wr3zd5p
@user-mm9wr3zd5p - 06.12.2023 14:30

The main difference between “describe” and “explain” is that when you describe something, you are giving a general overview of it, while when you explain something, you are providing specific details. In other words, “explain” is more detailed than “describe”.

Ответить
@JoseTomasVergara
@JoseTomasVergara - 21.11.2023 06:01

Thank u so much for this explanation!

Ответить
@Janaely
@Janaely - 20.11.2023 10:18

I wish my brain were able to conquer calculus so I could be a physicist. Lately I’ve been thinking a lot about relationships, and apparently I was thinking about supersymmetry and supergravity, not a science fiction story idea 🙃

Math as a subject/course/field/career is weighted towards people who can easily think in terms of written characters, which makes sense. Like, it’s important for people who like to speak math to do that…but how many people get left out of the theory process because they suck at remembering all those damn trig equivalencies, for example?

Ответить
@parreiraleonardo4189
@parreiraleonardo4189 - 14.11.2023 05:36

About Grassmann numbers, aren’t they nilpotents?? I mean, Tensors (matrices)??

Ответить
@JoaoLeote7331
@JoaoLeote7331 - 14.11.2023 02:05

They invented new maths

Ответить
@jelle191
@jelle191 - 10.11.2023 16:21

Your videos explain all sorts of physics in the clearest and most understandable way for me. For this topic specifically I kind of get the feeling that physicists are just adding complexity on top of complexity just to confuse everyone and come across smart cause it is hard to refute. I know they are trying to solve the big bang and dark energy/matter problem. But it just feels so much more likely that a simple miscalculation or interpretation of measurements are the cause of these problems. We must be giving our measurements/models quite some credit if we claim that there must be some we unimaginable kind of physics going on just to make up for a simple factor of ten(?) of mass. In astronomy, it is not uncommon to make mistakes by one order of magnitute.

Ответить
@Letsgoback2thefuture
@Letsgoback2thefuture - 17.10.2023 01:32

Yin and Yang bitches

Ответить
@michael.forkert
@michael.forkert - 07.10.2023 13:40

Why don’t you explain the Super Stupidity of WAR?

Ответить
@WutDaWeather
@WutDaWeather - 07.10.2023 07:11

Your videos are masterpieces! Always exited when you make an upload!!!

Ответить
@user-yh4oc6rr6y
@user-yh4oc6rr6y - 29.09.2023 21:35

I like,I love it! 🎉

Ответить
@Killer_Kovacs
@Killer_Kovacs - 21.09.2023 08:04

Can fermions condensate behind an event horizon?

Ответить
@wartome3196
@wartome3196 - 21.09.2023 00:20

Anyone actually believe this? Just wondering

Ответить
@user-br8mw1ip8f
@user-br8mw1ip8f - 12.09.2023 19:46

So is that superposition

Ответить
@slinks2563
@slinks2563 - 04.09.2023 16:40

Thank you so much for your service. I have watched your videos all weekend in an effort to understand Quantum Electrodynamics, the Electron, Photon etc. You have done such a great job Alessandro. ❤

Ответить
@morgansutherland6091
@morgansutherland6091 - 03.09.2023 02:00

When talking about the other symmetries you show seven but only talk about 6 what is the 7th one

Ответить
@jigglypuff_foryoutube1700
@jigglypuff_foryoutube1700 - 29.08.2023 15:03

God’s creation is so intricate and fascinating!

Ответить
@frootube5662
@frootube5662 - 29.08.2023 11:18

can someone please solve this shit?

Ответить
@flippyjunior1267
@flippyjunior1267 - 26.08.2023 18:23

me cutting a birthday cake
"I've achived supersymmetrie"

Ответить
@OneOfGamers
@OneOfGamers - 24.08.2023 10:47

This video is very gregic

Ответить
@Demogorgon47
@Demogorgon47 - 22.08.2023 18:35

Grassman numbers = my mind blown!!!!!!!!!

Ответить
@alexiadamasceno1255
@alexiadamasceno1255 - 21.08.2023 15:46

what's the hu, B, hd, LL3, LL2, LL1, QL3, QL2, QL1?

Ответить
@markrockliff2742
@markrockliff2742 - 21.08.2023 01:55

If a vibrating string in String Theory has a Super symmetry along its surface with a count of forty components a symmetrical structure could exist in a configuration of an enneagram. The four Bosons would work as a team unit and the remaining thirty six units would work as a team unit. All forty units would work in unison as a number pattern on the same enneagram. It is just a simple number pattern but it honours the laws of three and six and the principle that all processes begin at Zero at Point Nine and end at Nine at Point Nine while operating with a left and right direction upon the enneagram symbol. Not shore how an open strings could operate within such an idea. If you chose to think about this number pattern thirty six has tens column connected to the primary points of 3, 6, and 9 and the units column connected to the secondary point being point 1, 2, 4, 5, 7and 8. The four bosons are working through zero and nine at point nine and points three and six as if as acting like a switching mechanism. It's an abstract lateral thinking model only but if you are looking for mechanical structure it could be worth thinking about.

The Dark energy number.

{.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000138}

Rule one: A number viewed from the hundred's Column must be counted three times as if it has the same count in the ten's Column and the units Column. A number viewed in the tens Column must be counted two times as if it has the same count in the tens Column as if in the units Column. And the units are counted once.

Rule two: Any number/ numbers on the other side of the decimal point is are treated differently. They are simply added to create a sum tally number.

Apply rule one and rule two:

-273.15 Absolute Zero.
-274.15 One degree below.
-275.15 Two degrees below.
-276.15 Three degree below.

2 = 6 Zero's, 7 = 14 Zeros, 3 = 3 Zero's, (decimal point) 1 + 5 = 6. -273.15 (6 + 14 + 3 + 6 = 29) Twenty nine zeros.
2 = 6 Zero's, 7 = 14 Zeros, 4 = 4 Zero's, (decimal point) 1 + 5 = 6. -273.15 (6 + 14 + 4 + 6 = 30) Thirty zeros.
2 = 6 Zero's, 7 = 14 Zeros, 5 = 5 Zero's, (decimal point) 1 + 5 = 6. -273.15 (6 + 14 + 5 + 6 = 31) Thirty one zeros.
2 = 6 Zero's, 7 = 14 Zeros, 6 = 6 Zero's, (decimal point) 1 + 5 = 6. -273.15 (6 + 14 + 6 + 6 = 32) Thirty two zeros.

29 + 30 + 31 + 32 = 122

Fifty-four elemental parts are said to make up the standard model of particle physics. Yes, there is a 54 within the number pattern on the left-hand side of the decimal point. 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 54.

Rule two: Any number/ numbers on the other side of the decimal point is are treated differently. They are simply added to create a sum tally number.

1 + 5 = 6

1 + 5 = 6

1 + 5 = 6

1 + 5 = 6

6 + 6 + 6 + 6 = 24

How many quantum fields are there? The answer is 24.

The quarks and leptons are fermions, which is why they have antimatter counterparts, and the W boson comes in two equal-and-opposite varieties (positively and negatively charged), but all told, there are 24 unique, fundamental excitations of quantum fields possible.

1 +1 +1 1+1 +1 decimal point 1 + 5
1 +1 +1 1+1 +1 decimal point 1 + 5
1 +1 +1 1+1 +1 decimal point 1 + 5
1 +1 +1 1+1 +1 decimal point 1 + 5
.......... 24 ................................... 24

1 + 5 = 6 also reminds me of Edward Witten's M-theory.

Hunting For Clues.

If we think of 95% of the universe as being Dark / invisible and 5% as being ordinary matter, how can we begin to search for clues as to the possible mechanical structure underpinning the prepose the nature of the Dark unseen component of the universe. I will have a go at making some progress. Ordinary matter is 1/20th of the universe so 19/20ths is Dark, energy or dark energy and dark matter. Latter in the post I will mention 19 Boundaries of Creation the Ordinary is made of atoms and 19 Boundaries is linked to the Periodic Table of Elements. All matter is made of subatomic particles and it is said that each component has an antimatter opacite. So a number vale of 38 is part of the hunt. I can see seven ways to construct 38 within my number pattern so the Helix and the triangle in the first image below will be of interest when thinking of how the mind of man fits into the model. 19+1= 20. 19 Dark energy side and 19 Ordinary matter side. 19 associated with the Unseen dark universe and 19 associated with the machinery of ordinary matter the atoms that the human body that host the mind of man.

All counting unit values on a Cartesian plane have a base value of one and a power value of one both the base and the power belong to the zero, zero is host. so when we count the 138 we count 1= 0 , 3 = three zeros, 8= eight zeros. So 122 zeros and a 138 = 124 zeros. When I mention the 121 zeros and thirteen zeros the last zero I think of as belonging to the centre of the thirteen point Cartesian plane. The twelve from 1 + 3 + 8 = twelve zeros the twelve points on the X,Y,Z planes that surround the central zero.

We have the Dark energy number. 122 decimal places and a 138.

{.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000138}

So what about an idea like Dark energy has a construct made of weird structures weird structures of different sizes of dimensions performing a mechanical role providing a structural latus.

Where to start?

How about we start with the author Russell A. Smith and his Book Gurdjieff: COSMIC SECRETS.

Lets go to page: 109

DO
TI
LA DO
..... TI .....
SO ..... .....
..... LA DO
FA ..... ..... DO
..... ..... TI .....
MI SO ..... TI
..... ..... LA .....
RE ..... ..... ..... .....
..... FA ..... LA ..... DO
..... ..... ..... ..... TI .....
..... MI SO ..... ..... TI .7. .8. .9.10 .11.12. .13. .14. .15.16.17 .18 .19.
DO ..... ..... SO ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... LA ..... DO
TI RE ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... TI .....
..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... ..... DO
..... ..... MI ..... SO ...... ...... TI .....
LA DO ..... MI ..... SO ..... ..... TI
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... DO
..... TI RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... LA ..... ..... DO
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... TI .....
SO ..... ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... LA ...... ..... DO
..... ..... ..... ..... MI ..... SO ..... ..... ..... TI .....
..... LA DO ..... ..... MI ..... SO ..... ..... ..... TI
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... DO
FA ..... ..... DO ..... ..... ..... ..... SO ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... TI ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ...... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... DO
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... TI .....
MI SO ..... TI ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... DO
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... MI ..... ..... SO ..... ..... ..... TI .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... DO
..... ..... LA ..... DO ..... ..... MI ...... ...... SO ..... ..... ..... TI .....
RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... ..... DO
..... FA ..... LA ..... DO ..... ..... MI ..... ..... SO ..... ..... ..... TI .....
..... ..... ..... ..... TI ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... ..... DO
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... TI .....
..... MI SO ..... ..... TI ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... ..... DO
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... MI ..... SO ..... ..... ..... ..... .... TI .....
DO ..... ..... SO ..... ..... ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ...... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....


That do you note?

If you count all the DO RE MI FA SO LA TI

The count is 121 one short of 122 the one hundred and twenty two count of zeros in the dark energy number. What remains is one zero and a one three eight. If we continue our lateral think process we can think of the 0 1 3 8 as thirteen zeros and now we can view two patterns of zeros a thirteen pattern and and a pattern of 121 zeros.

My thinking is. Because we live in a three dimensional world the thirteen maybe linked to a Cartesian plane with an X ,Y, Z three dimensional lattice. This thirteen point model with a zero at the centre and two points each side of the zero in the X plain and Y plane and the Z plane evenly spaced apart could be thought of as like a latus like a quantum mechanical lates.

Another possibility is the 1, 3, 8 component of the thirteen zeros that adds to twelve maybe the Higgs field. The vacuum expectation value of the Higgs field is not 246 GeV it is slightly less but if that slightly less was added because it was something needed then 246 GeV then the following lateral thinking process could sum, 2 + 4 + 6 = 12 twelve zeros. A complete sumading to 13 zeros.

It could not be that simple or could it be that simple?

Ответить
@adambrennan6876
@adambrennan6876 - 18.08.2023 17:48

Excellent description of supersymmetry

Ответить
@syedali676
@syedali676 - 16.08.2023 22:13

Allah tells us in the Quran that everything is created in pairs over 14 hundred years ago. Chapter 51 verses 47 to 49. ALLAH HU AKBAR ( THE God is the GREATEST)

Ответить
@Pr0phet_Taker_official
@Pr0phet_Taker_official - 07.08.2023 00:04

Albrect Entrati has entered the chat

Ответить
@chevasit
@chevasit - 31.07.2023 02:12

Great 👍👍👍

Ответить
@davidkemp3154
@davidkemp3154 - 30.07.2023 20:10

Wouldn't shadow symmetry or mirror symmetry fit term of supersymmetry & gu better?

Ответить
@veixquadron
@veixquadron - 30.07.2023 08:02

symmetry = identity

Ответить
@Deepakyadav-vp8xx
@Deepakyadav-vp8xx - 27.07.2023 10:46

Define super space

Ответить
@dariovaccaro9401
@dariovaccaro9401 - 04.07.2023 14:21

Great video! Easy to follow, intuitive but not trivial. Compliments!

Ответить
@ZeUberflip
@ZeUberflip - 30.06.2023 17:23

HIGGSINO BABY

Ответить
@nikosgazikas
@nikosgazikas - 11.06.2023 00:24

Grassmann numbers then need to be geometry not number.

Ответить
@SaifEddinMej
@SaifEddinMej - 03.06.2023 09:05

And We set the scales of justice for the Day of Resurrection, so no soul will be wronged in anything

Ответить