Комментарии:
That leaves the huge difference that the m1 has to emulate the x86 code and is almost as fast. try to run Apple code on the X86 .. 🤣-joke.
overall, the m1 will be superior to the current generation (notebook segment). we waited half a year until a lot was optimized. In addition, with most notebooks the battery life and the fan noise are the trouble. perfect for a notebook
I had so many issues with my brand new Dell XPS 15 9500 that I would prefer the MacBook Pro 13 (unless you need 32GB RAM, which you can find on the XPS 13 only)
Ответитьman just make video on davinci resolve render test. take some 4k clips and render on both of these.. there we will know the difference.. these ultrabooks arent for gaming...
ОтветитьWhat is the price of the dell?
ОтветитьIf this comparison was done against an AMD chipset, then it would beat the Mac for sure. Also, kind of unbelievable that Fortnite runs better on the Mac than on the Dell considering the Epic v Apple suit.
ОтветитьGetting a MacBook Pro is overkill, at this stage. A $999 Macbook Air would give the same results. They use the same/similar SOC.
ОтветитьDell. MacBooks are so overrated imo
ОтветитьYou can game on mac's?
ОтветитьAs a macbook 2017 user I can only admit that the XPS is that one windows laptop I turn my head to... it’s sleek, well designed and has nice materials
Ответить37fps vs 29fps are both unplayable frames rates. Certainly not 6x the performance.
The quality setting for Fortnight were set for auto. Would that cause the games to perform differently than setting the quality settings manually?
What is the actual battery performance when gaming? Does it actually matter? I’ve never games for hours away from a power outlets anyway.
Ita emulated on the mac
ОтветитьUseless Sombra....
ОтветитьWhy do you have shadow quality 'turned OFF' + level of detail at 'Lowest' in XPS 13, meanwhile shadow quality at 'Low' + level of detail at 'Low' in Apple M1 in SoTTR...?? That is not an equal comparison.
ОтветитьWho cares about bezels,
Just give the best screen, battery, performance.
Let's be honest vast majority of consumers don't buy these for gaming, this video just feel biased I mean I didn't see things which people who are buying these really care about like where's battery comparison, speaker comparison, trackpad, video editing, Temperature or even the keyboard....but no just gaming it's what everyone wants to see smh
Like it or not these M1 chips are revolutionary which is a good thing for consumers, competition is healthy I just don't understand why people just wanna see these fail
Always wanted to see a comparison like this. Thank you.
ОтветитьAlways choosing Dell, say No to Macbook
ОтветитьDo you know what you're doing? Anyway, I don't know what you're doing.
1. No Geekbench running score testing
2. No Final cut pro(4K->1080P) time testing
3. No temperature testing after step 2(above)
4. No Game running compare(Frame rate)
5. No Battery life testing after playing 4K/1080P video 1 hour
6. No battery from 100%->0% testing( video+music+ Internet, etc.)
7. no special software compare testing(Adobe/XCode/Matlab/AutoCAD,etc.)
8. No Front camera compare testing
9. No weights compare testing
10. no price compare
How does battery life compare?
Ответитьnot equal settings on tomb raider, didn't compare cpu performance, didn't compare battery life, goes on to assume XPS is running these games under some optimization, even if that's the case its not the same as emulating x86 on a new chip, and says he likes the stated 14-16 hour battery life on XPS...Macbook is stated at 20 hours and it delivers the efficiency, check out Dave2D if you don't believe me. And the most important thing of all PRICE. Let me hear you say the price when you say its a comparison video. Biased just like Linus
ОтветитьHonestly. It's a clear win for macbook for most people. Significantly cheaper. I can't even buy the dell xps 13 for under $2000 where I'm from, because they don't even sell the cheapest model. Mac, I can easily buy for $1000. Convenient.
ОтветитьCrazy these games work on these little laptops
ОтветитьWhat about run docker containers, with docker-compose or docker swarm on macbook m1?
ОтветитьShadow of Tomb Raider
Lowest settings
Dell: level of detail - lowest, shadow quality - off, 37 fps
Mac: level of detail - low, shadow quality - low, 29 fps
BTW shadow quality significantly affects the frame rate.
Normal settings
Dell: Pure hair - low
Mac: Pure hair - normal
BTW pure hair significantly affects the frame rate.
So how about fair comparison with the same settings?
Well I really like dell but it's so much expensive
ОтветитьThanks for the review comparison, just what I was looking for. For my requirements the Dell XPS 13 would be my choice. Primarily due to its Windows/Intel base on the Dell XPS 13. For my requirements I have to consider application compatibility, drivers, accessories such as external GPU. However if I was in the Apple eco system the new M1 MacBook Pro 13 would be a very tempting upgrade.
ОтветитьMac laptop not meant for games! What the hell is this?”
ОтветитьIf only Mac came out with a new look for their MacBook line up then it’s a win for me
ОтветитьThere's no link for the wallpaper in description.. 😭
ОтветитьWhy does it look like it was paid by intel?
Skipped real battery usage (under normal load MacBook pro will stay alive for 4 more hours), apps, benchmarks.
Testing only not optimized games. (Emulation is eating 30% of performance).
It sounds like last intel conference when Intel said it's 2 times better than AMD.
It WAS 2 times better... For 7 seconds because of battery saving mode in AMD CPU lmao.
One suggestion: compare some softwares that already have Apple Silicon support, like Chrome.
ОтветитьWhy comparing mac for gaming in first place? Mac never meant for gaming as windows does right? Better compare blender render test, Premier pro cc, after effects, etc also don’t forget to mention durability of both machines in terms of their work. Windows machine slowing down vs MacBook slowing down in long term usage?
ОтветитьKeep in mind most of these tests are unoptimized for Apple silicon and are running through translation of Rosetta 2
ОтветитьThat Dell is a minimum of $1000.00 more than the M1 MacBook Pro....extrapolate the price/performance curve and consider which is the better value..... re-sell them in 3 years and I bet you'll get much more from the current MBP ..... the Dell will be a door stop....x86-based units will have little to no re-sale value......admit it
Ответитьi want tiger lake 13" macbook pro
Ответитьhe looks like meek mill
ОтветитьThe M1 16 gb get more quality graphic and no lagging more the 8gb for the games or they same ?
Ответитьcan't wait for the 16 or 32 core Macs w their 5nm silicon. Will be a beast
ОтветитьDon't mind but this is the most pointless video for m1 MacBook on yt rn
Ответитьwow.......................
ОтветитьApple promises 20 hrs* battery life for macbook pro13 m1
ОтветитьIs this the intel evo?
ОтветитьXps does not get even close to 14 freaking hours.
ОтветитьWhat specs were in the xps you tested this with, i would like to know the performance of the 32gig ram one
ОтветитьGreat Video sir.
ОтветитьAre you financially incentivised by Intel? Yes or no? Please be honest.
ОтветитьApple is running this stuff in a emulator environment on top of the native os because these apps are not optimized for m1 chips and it’s still running
ОтветитьSoo 1300 for 5 less frames or 2300$ for 5 more. WORTHHH LMAO this a joke
ОтветитьALL OF THESE GAMES ARE UNDER EMULATION
Ответить