China's Type 052D Destroyer vs. Taiwan's Entire Surface Navy

China's Type 052D Destroyer vs. Taiwan's Entire Surface Navy

Military Watch Magazine Videos

4 года назад

25,423 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@swirskiSergio
@swirskiSergio - 12.11.2023 16:09

And now after two years as we see all russian Black sea fleet running away to Novorossiysk bases from Ukraine which basically doesn`t have Navy all these videos don`t seem so right...

Ответить
@neilcarter77
@neilcarter77 - 16.09.2023 00:05

Ive seen the grim reapers do this in dcs, much different outcome.

Ответить
@lefraudjames3764
@lefraudjames3764 - 31.05.2023 02:11

Range warfare

Ответить
@chenchu1953
@chenchu1953 - 28.03.2023 11:08

NONSENSE.
1. Hsiung Feng III has much more longer operational range and much faster speed than 140km, mach 2 in your video.
2. I never seen CJ100, DK10 can be launched from 052D
3. YJ18 is a good missile but cannot fly mach 3 in whole cruise except for its sprint range.
4. HHQ16 is not used on 052D but 054A instead
5. I don't find any reason for China declaring a war towards Taiwan, so it would be a criminal invasion if it happened.

Ответить
@lukeallison3713
@lukeallison3713 - 28.02.2023 17:30

Best bet for Taiwan is to have its fleet run away and hopefully not be destroyed. Pretty sure the OHP mark 13 launcher can take sm2 instead of sm 1 and that sm-6 has been studied to go on the mk26 on the kidd class so maybe with that they can defend themselves long enough to survive. The best way for Taiwan to spend new resources is some rapid dragon pallets on aircrafts with lots of anti ship missiles and asymmetric naval tactics with lots of small corvettes. The essm would be a great missile to acquire for new corvettes for medium range air defence with a smaller footprint, maybe also do an Australian style OHP refit with an 8 cell mark 41 for 32 essm

Ответить
@zomgneedaname
@zomgneedaname - 06.08.2022 17:43

This video should be getting 100k views right about now

Ответить
@rubywong8435
@rubywong8435 - 20.05.2022 16:45

I’m

Ответить
@hasanmustufa9667
@hasanmustufa9667 - 12.05.2022 22:48

Comparing taiwan to china in any means is like compare cuba to america there is no comparison you are talking about type 052d now china even have type 055 with even hypersonic missile so its obviously a win win situation for china

Ответить
@DaGoook
@DaGoook - 24.04.2022 13:32

How does the Arleigh Burke Flight III compare to the 052D and 055?

Ответить
@leothelion6075
@leothelion6075 - 23.04.2022 03:45

大陸有宇航員
台灣有同性戀

大陸有核武彈
台灣有茶葉蛋

Ответить
@LAK2049
@LAK2049 - 22.04.2022 16:28

Who would win?
The entire Taiwan navy or
One 052D boi

Ответить
@pizizhangsg1319
@pizizhangsg1319 - 26.03.2022 04:32

No, Taiwan will defeat entire PLA navy with LOVE

Ответить
@hughmungus2760
@hughmungus2760 - 18.03.2022 12:52

the only Possible hope the taiwanese navy has in this scenario is electronic countermeasures which may result in less than 1 kill per missile. forcing the type052 to retreat and rearm.

Ответить
@PHOEBE_LOVELY
@PHOEBE_LOVELY - 05.11.2021 05:38

海红旗 牛逼啊

Ответить
@moalzaben5554
@moalzaben5554 - 12.10.2021 19:33

So Norway’s Naval Strike missile can rival china’s own anti ship missiles and the Norwegian will replace the Harpoon?

Ответить
@jeffstrong4580
@jeffstrong4580 - 22.09.2021 06:52

If S Korea build its own nuclear submarines, it will lock in China's North fleet from leaving which leaves S Korean navy to deal with China's East fleet until their Southern fleet arrive which will be all over by time they get to East sea. Chinese Northern fleet ports are in range of S Korean cruise and tactical missiles and they are within range from S Korean ground based anti ship missiles if they try to pass S Korea. It will give even chance against China's navy without the US navy. S Korean navy has better quality ships and better prepared sailor.

Ответить
@mikel4690
@mikel4690 - 20.09.2021 04:04

LoL there are still boneheads thinking a war will break out there - Taiwan Straight is barely 100-180 KM, and the PLA regular artilleries - we are not even talking about The Second Artillery Missile Force - will saturate the entire beachhead and ports of Taiwan in 24 hours. Trust me - the first shot of the war is the last. The Taiwan politicians are allowed a pre-drawn box from the US and the Mainland in which they can talk up a storm :) That little island is a clearly marked geopolitical pawn and it moves when allowed, freeze in fair when told to stopped.

Ответить
@zomgneedaname
@zomgneedaname - 29.08.2021 05:38

Never realised the difference in missile tech generations means that older DDGs might as well as be gun DD's from WW2...

Ответить
@Alex-zg2xi
@Alex-zg2xi - 18.07.2021 07:03

二营长,你他娘的意大利炮呢?

Ответить
@joosiekawk
@joosiekawk - 15.07.2021 02:30

just 1 single Type 052D destroyer can destroy the entire Taiwanese naval fleet.

Ответить
@yanshuoli69
@yanshuoli69 - 10.07.2021 11:42

As a chinese i gotta say the title alone kinda turns me on

Ответить
@TresLinguas
@TresLinguas - 19.06.2021 05:15

This is literally ridiculous and further proof that virtually unlimited access to information isn’t always a good thing.

Ответить
@jn5930
@jn5930 - 16.05.2021 16:50

To be precise, Taiwan is not actually called Taiwan. You can call it Republic of China (ROC). The so-called China is actually called People’s Republic of China (PROC).

Ответить
@neutralino1905
@neutralino1905 - 04.05.2021 15:05

Cool. Glad to see how far China’s military has come since the 20th century. Hopefully it won't need to be used.

Ответить
@balomamedeki2044
@balomamedeki2044 - 04.05.2021 08:35

China wants to take over the fucking world cant people see that?

Ответить
@gyzq
@gyzq - 07.04.2021 10:22

Seriously? A single 052D destroyer wipes out whole ROC fleet? Even a mainlander could hardly believe it. Apparently, ROC air force doesn't exist in your universe.

Ответить
@loudandclear2518
@loudandclear2518 - 30.03.2021 09:44

Dream on, War won't happen. Too many relatives and friends on both sides.

Ответить
@lofisstealin4012
@lofisstealin4012 - 12.03.2021 16:45

Ok

Ответить
@taichen2881
@taichen2881 - 16.02.2021 00:12

Taiwan's warships are decades old. It is doubtful any of them can still function in battle. Kidd class for example dates back to the 70s and hasn't been upgraded a single time.

Ответить
@vanisshen4467
@vanisshen4467 - 14.02.2021 06:59

PLA Rocket Force: I accept defeat if any single one of the Taiwanese ships make it out of port.

Ответить
@brianchangyrs
@brianchangyrs - 05.02.2021 05:21

China has nearly 30 of these now and counting. Not adding 055

Ответить
@eymeeraosaka2954
@eymeeraosaka2954 - 02.02.2021 06:58

Good analysis...A realistic assessment.

Ответить
@happyface96
@happyface96 - 01.02.2021 06:15

Too confident on PLAN' over-the-horizon capabilities.

Ответить
@jorgenoriega3954
@jorgenoriega3954 - 28.01.2021 01:57

O sea que esta poronga china es mas o menos un crucero imperial o una mini estrella de la muerte

Ответить
@theliansin6516
@theliansin6516 - 14.01.2021 04:32

Chinese will not attack Chinese😁

Ответить
@leohedrick1624
@leohedrick1624 - 27.12.2020 13:04

Do 055

Ответить
@thedamnedatheist
@thedamnedatheist - 25.10.2020 07:21

But the Type 52 & it's missiles are all made in China, so poor quality & most won't work properly. Here comes the 50cent army.

Ответить
@junjiepan2824
@junjiepan2824 - 16.10.2020 15:19

Very good video!

Ответить
@albertmax9662
@albertmax9662 - 10.10.2020 00:43

Think LRASM.... the type 52D cannot defend against what it cannot see.

Ответить
@robertlee5214
@robertlee5214 - 02.10.2020 07:12

can missiles from 052D tell the diffrence between a warship and a large fishing vessel? I am very concerned about surrounding fishman's life. Fishman's Life Matters !!!

Ответить
@tnt600
@tnt600 - 25.09.2020 10:59

I can only mention that the US doesn’t mind Chinese blowing Chinese blood, this game should stop and people with brains need to think about donating their son’s and daughter’s blood for something that can be worked out.

Ответить
@Hinduslovecowpiss
@Hinduslovecowpiss - 14.09.2020 19:47

Better than binkovs battlegrounds

Ответить
@daveincv
@daveincv - 12.09.2020 06:11

LOL..you were never in any navy.....you just can't WikipediA..your way though life..

Ответить
@ravenmusic6392
@ravenmusic6392 - 11.09.2020 19:12

The Type052's don't carry the YJ-100 missile, which has an 800km range, not 1000. Almost all the missile ranges are false. The YJ-18 for one has the land attack specs written down, the ASM Variant has a 180 km range, and only 40km at Mach 3, it does not have the ability to control speed like the Recent Russian ones do.

Taiwan's SM-2 missiles are not obsolete, they were modernized along with the SM-1MR by NCSIST.

The ship doesn't even have enough missiles to sink Taiwan's navy. This is especially the case with their large missile boat fleet, the fleet totals some 50 craft. Even your own numbers cite 24ASM's, in the 052D's armament (which isn't likely as usually ships trade off some missiles for older ones given the low numbers of new systems).

China's navy is much better equipped, but one ship would be dealt with quite quickly with similar range of the current ASM's and Taiwan's numbers. Numbers and tracking is key to a naval war, and one ship cannot track 50 surface targets at once and sink them in a coordinated manor.

Ответить
@erickwo5995
@erickwo5995 - 09.09.2020 07:06

No war would be like this. It's just imaginary.

Ответить
@totifernandez9532
@totifernandez9532 - 07.09.2020 17:58

You do not have to use your destroyers. Just a bunch of ASMs will clear the water of rebellious province ships.

Ответить
@yu-jd5jg
@yu-jd5jg - 04.09.2020 01:53

The US will encourage, and then sacrifice, Taiwan to enter a conflict with China for political gains. China will not be that stupid to fall into the US Divide and Conquer trap. If there must be a military conflict over Taiwan, China will take on the US around, not in, Taiwan island. Without the US support, those Taiwan Separatists and the DPP will collapse automatically

Ответить
@basshoppero5297
@basshoppero5297 - 04.09.2020 01:10

呆弯烂剥剜

Ответить
@aadilahmad9539
@aadilahmad9539 - 02.09.2020 16:10

Pak China Relation Forever.. Great China Lots of Respect and Love from your "iron Brother" pakistan

Ответить
@talutali7379
@talutali7379 - 20.08.2020 18:39

Bro u forgot the 5th line of air defense, the 7 barrel CIWS gun for range of upto 3 km

Ответить