What Is Wrong With The Army’s New Rifle?

What Is Wrong With The Army’s New Rifle?

Tactical Tales

1 месяц назад

1,175,679 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@no_name_nate
@no_name_nate - 06.05.2025 23:18

if it aint broke don't fix it

Ответить
@Xubodaaa
@Xubodaaa - 07.05.2025 00:31

A MASSIVE OVER FEEDING ISSUE

Ответить
@Dungeon_fitness
@Dungeon_fitness - 07.05.2025 02:11

Well it is made by sig Sauer so theres that lol

Ответить
@CaIadai
@CaIadai - 07.05.2025 05:28

Genuine american quality - in other words , over priced and shit.

Ответить
@its_Not_Logic
@its_Not_Logic - 07.05.2025 05:35

If its working don’t fix it

Ответить
@DukecjOne
@DukecjOne - 07.05.2025 18:33

They started making 25rd mags

Ответить
@quarry1030
@quarry1030 - 07.05.2025 19:56

The army should get those stabilized camera guide skeletons to help support the weight of stuff, especially with those rigs being so light and able to carry so much.

Might even lead into standard issue leg exo's, lol.

Ответить
@michaelmarkle5133
@michaelmarkle5133 - 07.05.2025 21:03

20 round magazine. Less ammo carried.

Ответить
@kallmejay3662
@kallmejay3662 - 08.05.2025 09:55

Soldiers constantly complained about the M4 in Afghanistan and Iraq.😂😂😂 I think you’re full of shit!

Ответить
@robert-joshuamcfaddin7041
@robert-joshuamcfaddin7041 - 08.05.2025 14:33

Yeah... It's a cool weapon, but it has some serious design flaws. I rather my military be taken care of.

Ответить
@Mccalldkxkeikjf
@Mccalldkxkeikjf - 08.05.2025 15:17

Pls sybau

Ответить
@NGADFighterJet
@NGADFighterJet - 08.05.2025 22:15

It takes testing bro

Ответить
@shmellyoulater
@shmellyoulater - 09.05.2025 03:09

Sig wants to make explosives but doesnt know how to make grenades, so they just make their firearms.

Ответить
@Theb388lade
@Theb388lade - 09.05.2025 04:03

My ass sitting here with the M27 the weighs damn near 17 pounds with all the crap on it id love somwthing only 2 poounds heavier then the M4

Ответить
@philm0graphy
@philm0graphy - 09.05.2025 11:18

That literal aimbot optic is gonna make it worth it

Ответить
@GabeMiller-pc8nu
@GabeMiller-pc8nu - 09.05.2025 19:35

The xm7 shoots 227 tho

Ответить
@LincolnMcRae-n8x
@LincolnMcRae-n8x - 10.05.2025 03:01

What i think is units should have normal infantry using the m4 carbine and a few using the xm7 as kind of a "heavy" soldier to handle Armour/enemies hiding behind a wall/barricade

Ответить
@robertparrott2172
@robertparrott2172 - 10.05.2025 06:49

US Army pvt. here please stop lying to ppl

Ответить
@matt-i7e
@matt-i7e - 10.05.2025 17:07

from what i’ve heard the only real complaint people have about the rifle is that it’s heavy as fuck

Ответить
@HypeGator
@HypeGator - 10.05.2025 19:48

Didn't they roll back a complete adoption? I thought it would be used more as a designated marksman rifle?

Ответить
@thekeeper5588
@thekeeper5588 - 11.05.2025 03:38

I don’t like the new Sig.

Ответить
@jonchase7752
@jonchase7752 - 11.05.2025 08:58

The only issue I have is we’re busting out all this money for this stuff it should be flawless ready to go

Ответить
@skillgaming4373
@skillgaming4373 - 11.05.2025 18:52

just history repeating itself

Ответить
@destiny49
@destiny49 - 11.05.2025 23:59

I mean, the gun is still Very very new so of course its gonna have errors, it'd be untrustworthy if it Didint

Ответить
@JohnAlmond-p9h
@JohnAlmond-p9h - 12.05.2025 21:10

The Army should of just use like an AR-10 or something because the Army has a s*** ton of 308

Ответить
@joshuaszeto
@joshuaszeto - 13.05.2025 07:47

I still think the military made a huge mistake not adoption the plastic cased ammo. That ammo was more effiicient, lighter and ballistically identical. Whats even better is that it can easily be backwards compatible with all pre-existing guns already in use. Sure you can't reuse the spent casings but i highly doubt anyone in a warzone is picking up casings and reloading them later. But they will notice the extra mag they can carry because of the reduced ammo weight.

Ответить
@Modrost7274
@Modrost7274 - 13.05.2025 12:46

Another big problem with the XM7, is that the troops that have the XM7 are using rounds that are less powerful for practice, because the actual round is expensive. So that means that when they are using the full power round in combat, its going to shoot higher, further, and faster. I couldnt imagine having to experience that. I couldn't imagine underestimating the round and having it shoot way over an enemy in combat. Completely fucks up any doctrine. The weapon was an absolute horrible idea. The main problem i have with the gun, is that we have no stockpile of the ammunition, there is none of it, unlike the 5.56 cartridge. They should have went with 300 blackout rather than this fag round that we nothing have of.

Ответить
@Yes_im.a-lordpeacock
@Yes_im.a-lordpeacock - 13.05.2025 19:01

Maybe it's gonna kill soldiers because its a gun?

Ответить
@longpath_8965
@longpath_8965 - 14.05.2025 00:21

at this point just use the M16

Ответить
@phasedout598
@phasedout598 - 14.05.2025 02:26

How the fuck is it 2 pounds heavier I bet you I could make on lighter than the damn m4 standard

Ответить
@AUTISTIC_CRACKHEAD
@AUTISTIC_CRACKHEAD - 15.05.2025 04:38

I love your vids hope you da best

Ответить
@turcitox
@turcitox - 15.05.2025 07:53

Waiting for the XM7A1

Ответить
@brandonhenderson7020
@brandonhenderson7020 - 15.05.2025 08:07

80,000 psi is the same as a 50 cal crazy

Ответить
@AIDS-abo
@AIDS-abo - 15.05.2025 13:52

🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡🚡

Ответить
@Purge_Punk_Hyena_1999
@Purge_Punk_Hyena_1999 - 15.05.2025 14:58

Then can we bring back the MX8 project again, I'm getting sick and tired of M4s and M16s that been using for 50 years!

Ответить
@02lilsteve28
@02lilsteve28 - 15.05.2025 19:29

its biggest draw back it'll always have is its low round count going from 210 to 140 is huge

Ответить
@IntrusiveOfficial
@IntrusiveOfficial - 15.05.2025 21:44

Damn that's crazy 🚡

Ответить
@communist_elmo
@communist_elmo - 16.05.2025 01:35

One thing I don't understand is. Why are they trying to make a new rifle instead of just using the scar?

Ответить
@imfine0_0
@imfine0_0 - 16.05.2025 15:47

DONT CHANGE SOMETHING THATS NOT BROKEN !

Ответить
@Theyluvmoney223
@Theyluvmoney223 - 16.05.2025 23:17

Bros out here spreading propaganda against the us army to make us look bad this shit dose not happen bro. Dude lying to yall lol

Ответить
@CARSSS77
@CARSSS77 - 17.05.2025 00:21

Thats why its still the XM7 and not the M7 yet

Ответить
@Greks-Tegeleb
@Greks-Tegeleb - 20.05.2025 18:55

estonia mentioned

Ответить
@thegreattanker1566
@thegreattanker1566 - 24.05.2025 01:16

I'm in the army this is not true

Ответить
@solvietsandwich6110
@solvietsandwich6110 - 24.05.2025 01:30

Bro they said the Xm7 is actually really good and it’s a bit heavier than the M4 but it’s not really a big deal. This video makes the flaws way bigger than it actually is

Ответить
@damirk3
@damirk3 - 27.05.2025 16:16

The "MUH PRIVATE MILITARY COMPLEX IS BEST" failes yet again💪. You never make defence of your country profit driven, never

Ответить
@seanwhere
@seanwhere - 27.05.2025 21:58

no gun is perfect, look at how the m16 started.

Ответить
@Sergeant-Charlie-Bravo
@Sergeant-Charlie-Bravo - 29.05.2025 06:55

Like any new weapon platform, it takes time to adjust the firearm in many variants. Even the M16, which was the early, less developed version of the M4, had many different problems, including many malfunctions and deforming.

Ответить
@501stmedia
@501stmedia - 01.06.2025 19:15

It’s also insanely inaccurate. From what I’ve seen/heard a standard M4 has around a 2 moa and the new XM7 is 4-8 moa. Sheer unreliability.

Ответить
@Laary_Lemon
@Laary_Lemon - 01.06.2025 19:34

Always remember, your weapon was made by the lowest bidder

Ответить
@TEZZNO_126
@TEZZNO_126 - 04.06.2025 20:47

It’s cause it’s from sig

Ответить