Комментарии:
After 39 patches it's now a good game lol
ОтветитьCoh Carnage is a paid actor by CD Projekt Red... literally... Is what the Starfield stans would say lol. Cyberpunk is so much better in every way. I do agree Starfield has great ship building which is fun and all, but it's apples to oranges. Glad you're enjoying your playthrough of Cyberpunk!
ОтветитьYeah, but the fact that they didn't try to go for 60 FPS on console
ОтветитьTo bad Cohh will blindly defend the games hes in. Hes not wrong here, but his defending CP when it first came out was notable.
ОтветитьCyberpunk has a better aesthetic
but starfield is better at launch
The world and writing of cyberpunk kept me playing through the above average gameplay loop (with aspects of the game being like PS2 level like driving and the police mechanics on release)
The gameplay of starfield is keeping me playing starfield a lot more than its world, the writing so far is pretty good.
SF gameplay is worse than CP overall. They couldn't even bother to make the jet pack hover or boost horizontally.
ОтветитьWhy am I watching this?
ОтветитьSo Starfield is Minecraft with ships?!? 😅
ОтветитьBOTH TRASH
ОтветитьComparing Starfield to Cyberpunk is a night and day comparison but the only difference is Starfield recently came out where Cyberpunk when it came out it was in a bad state but then they just made it amazing. So let's see if our friends at Bethesda can do the same.
ОтветитьEven I’ll say it now, I do love cyberpunk but man night city is one of the greatest city’s in video game history it feels like an actual
Real place, more than gta 5 to me anyway
Kudos for cdpr team to not ditch the game completely but keep working on it relentlessly.
Ответитьgotta love when streamers watch a video. (plays two seconds, pauses, commentates an hour on the two words said, closes video)
ОтветитьWhen cyberpunk was released, everyone mocked it with GTA 5. See how the tables have turned 😂
ОтветитьThe Phantom Liberty's Dogtown is so crazy, anywhere you walk you are in awe. The scenery, the complexity, the vibe is on a movie level, this is by far the best game so far.
Starfield looks like a Fallout 4 mod, with instanced space simulation like 15 years ago. There is no vibe and no life to it, the design is dull and outdated, the story sucks. It's like comparing gold with stones.
Hear me out. Combine them
ОтветитьAsmongold's editors making sure that they get all kinds of malding balding asmongold in there.
ОтветитьWhy when it comes to Starfield instead of "ship building" I do hear "shit building".
ОтветитьSteamCharts on Starfield vs. Cyberpunk is downright pathetic as far as Starfield goes.
Starfield was literally beaten in players by a *patch*. In fact, the hype for the patch alone had Cyberpunk competing with playercounts for Starfield before the patch even released. Post-patch, Cyberpunk mildly beat it, and now that Phantom Liberty is out, Cyberpunk is absolutely dunking it. A DLC for a three year old game is beating a AAA title that was hyped for years from one of those awful developers, like Blizzard, who has an army of simps who would preorder anything even if it was a computer-melting virus.
Starfield is a failure. Bethesda had to brag about the "number of players" by counting every single person who already had Gamepass who installed it once (note: those numbers are completely hidden and thus, it's almost certain that Bethesda literally just lied about it). You'll never get data about how many NEW people it brought to Gamepass which is all that matters. Comparing Steam sales to other games on Gamepass, it's obvious this was not actually the success they want you to believe. I don't trust for a second that 2/3rds of Steam users are also paying for Gamepass, which is what you'd be required to believe is the case to make their playercount numbers not humiliating. Starfield isn't even a month old, the drop in player interest was catastrophic.
It's a terrible game made by a terrible company who I wish to god would just go bankrupt and entirely out of business already.
Learn how to cook a steak
ОтветитьCyberpunk's graphics are surface level though, it's a really dated game when you want to do anything in the world.
ОтветитьNot even mods can save Starfield. Bathesda gameplay and story telling is just so outdated now. I have zero expectations for ES6
ОтветитьIt's not the same because starfield is 50x bigger than cyberpunk
ОтветитьCyberpunk is redeemed
ОтветитьI adore both games. Best RPGs ever made until cyberpunk orion and starfield 2 comes out. Or some other insane open world futuristic sci fi RPG by someone else.
ОтветитьTo be fair Cohh was an NPC in CP77 but SF is an absolute skeleton of a game. If you had to play one obv. get CP77.
Ответитьeven at launch with how bad the game ran, cyberpunk still looked 1million times better than starfield and had more heartfelt quest lines throughout and a even better story
ОтветитьI love both. Problems with Starfield 1 local map 2 storage boxes don't share. Problems with cyberpunk 1 Save files are not separated by character.
ОтветитьNeon does the cyberpunk look pretty good but starfield is not in the same leauge as cyberpunk2077 and thats okay both games are fun imho
ОтветитьComparing to Neon to Night City is wild
Neon is one block compared to whole City
Also other than Neon Core, it’s just empty
It took cyber punk 3 years to get to where it is. Why am I the only person who remembers how dogshit cyberpunk was at release. The game was completely unplayable for like 90% of people.
ОтветитьSure Cyberpunk is ok now after several updates. 😂
ОтветитьHe was basically in the game, of course he'd praise it.
ОтветитьCyberpunk 2077, I remember its launch, how bad it ran on some systems.
And now, look at that, just...something to behold. A real beautiful looking dystopia.
I didnt even play Starfield and i wasnt really hyped for it anyway. They better should make a new Fallout and Elder Scrolls soon, THEN i am hyped.
ОтветитьStarfield art direction is good, there are exceptional micro details, but Night City design is simply outstanding.
Cyberpunk doesn't have realistic looking procedural planets tho.
starfield convinced me never to buy another bethesda game again
ОтветитьCohhCarnage is a moron. oh how people forget how bad Cyberpunk 2077 was on release and it was definitly worse than starfield on release on a true comparison. Would I want bethesda to move to a unreal engine? no..yes the creation engine has major flaws but it is a haven for modders which is why starfield will be better.
ОтветитьI play both games, but Starfield is the king of RPGs so far, for many reasons:
-The amazing graphics, the detail in objects and geommetry are on a higher level, and the photorealistic looking planets, a real eye candy. (not all, but most).
-You feel the cities truly alive when walking around, the world interacts with you on many levels: the announcements, the people, the computers, the technology, the robots. You can establish conversation with hundres of NPCS. (short or long).
-The unpredictable events of the world, makes it addictive to keep exploring. (CP2077 city still feels fake, except for the new enhanced police)
-The constant feeling of discovery is also addictive as well.
-The huge amount freedom of choosing what to do next gives you superior immersion. (space combat, exploration, conversations, everything has RPG elements)
-NPCS make the game VERY immersive, they interact with you, they interact with other npcs, and eventually you will find yourself interacting with a bigger group.
-Your companions feel more alive than ever, being aware of what you do, what you say, and what decisions you make.
-there are many different factions, some good, some evil, and they also react given your decisions.
-the wars between factions.
....and those are only to name a few, but enough to make Starfield, undeniably the best RPG experience. by far.
Reply
With any luck , starfail will be playable in a couple years once the modders fix the bugs, crashes and poorly optimized code.
ОтветитьYeah ship building was cool the first 2 to 3 hours but most the Habs are useless on the ship and their utility is copied like no reason to get a 3x1 living quarters when it actually had the same thing as a 2x1 all in one but the 3x1 does not have research or nav table, IT HAS THE SAME CREW SLOTS they literally have 2 beds in the living quarters taken up by sentient blankets Bethesda (I love them but) Good God they were lazy and some people don't see it like really dig into it, I don't see anyone talking about them exiting atmosphere at e3 deep dive they flew from ground through clouds then into space but we somehow got a load screen simulator really baffles me no one's giving them heat all the dungeons or caves are pretty much the same and they could've let you stow in the starboard ship and bring some stuff to your next play through but NOOOOOPE they take everything besides skills so there no real incentive to build outpost and your very limited to what guns you can put on the ship I like starfield but it's painstakingly clear Bethesda was legit lazy af
ОтветитьCyberpunk has better cyberpunk cities.
Starfield has better space and ship building.
Weird
Cyberpunk, 2k ultra ray tracing 60 fps..
Starfail.. fsr does nothing, changing settings does nothing, glitches, bugs, crashes, booooooooorinngg.
The most exciting part of starfail is the constant worries about system crashes.
2.0 with path tracing and ray reconstruction looks so fucking good. I just cruise around the city and rake screenshots.
ОтветитьAnd you've changed your opinion on starfield... again
ОтветитьCyber punk polished up after years ago. Starfield real development happened 1 year ago and was way less bug ridden than cyberpunk. They just have to polish it more like cyberpunk.
And starfield story and content is immense. And the side quest stories are not copy pastas. They are mostly good or decent.
Starfield is amazing. and im problably gona play till Elder scrolls 6, and cyberpunk is a mess.
Ответить