The British United India? Lets End This Today! Keerthi History

It's is like Gravity not present in Earth before Newton's discover them 🤣🤣

Views on the colonial period in Indian history can vary among individuals, and some modern Indian women might choose not to acknowledge it for various reasons:

1. *Nationalistic Perspectives:* Some individuals may prioritize a nationalistic perspective, focusing on the resistance movements and efforts to gain independence rather than dwelling on the period of foreign rule.

2. *Cultural Identity:* There might be a desire to emphasize pre-colonial cultural identity and heritage, considering the colonial period as a disruption to traditional ways of life.

3. *Complex Legacies:* The colonial period left behind a complex legacy, including social, economic, and cultural changes. Some may find it challenging to confront this complexity and prefer to focus on more positive aspects of their heritage.

4. *Historical Interpretation:* Interpretations of history can vary, and some individuals may have been exposed to perspectives that downplay or omit the colonial period, shaping their understanding of the past.

5. *Personal Priorities:* Individuals may prioritize other aspects of history or contemporary issues over the colonial period, especially if they feel that acknowledging it does not contribute significantly to their current concerns or priorities.

It's essential to recognize that perspectives on historical events can be diverse, influenced by personal beliefs, education, and cultural contexts.

ChatGPT

what a confidence to put up blunders

India means bharat,and bharat were united by maryuan emipre, during maruyan empire rule Afganistan, pakistan, nepal, bhutan, india, bangldesh and parts of myanmar were under maruyan empire rule that was called akhand bharat. Jay akhanda bharat,jay hind 🇮🇳

Selected as Hindutva Geography Teacher 🌹♥️

Not AIB and Alia Bhatt saying Prithviraj Chauhan or an acute case of Darsheel Safari. Now there is Hindutva.

Can maps depicting akhand Bharat and bharatvarsh and bhoomadevi be called as Hindu art and hindutva

The answer to this question depends on how you define "Hindu art" and "Hindutva."

If you define "Hindu art" as any art that is produced by Hindus or that is inspired by Hindu themes, then maps depicting Akhand Bharat, Bharatvarsh, and Bhudevi could be considered Hindu art. These maps often depict the Indian subcontinent in its entirety, including territories that are currently part of Pakistan, Bangladesh, and other countries. They can be seen as a way of expressing a Hindu sense of cultural and religious unity.

If you define "Hindutva" as a political ideology that promotes Hindu nationalism, then maps depicting Akhand Bharat could also be considered Hindutva art. These maps can be seen as a way of advocating for a political union of all territories that are considered to be part of the Hindu homeland.

However, it is important to note that not all Hindus support the concept of Akhand Bharat. Some Hindus believe that the modern boundaries of India are legitimate and should be respected. Others believe that Akhand Bharat is a utopian ideal that is not achievable in the current political climate.

Ultimately, whether or not maps depicting Akhand Bharat, Bharatvarsh, and Bhudevi are considered Hindu art or Hindutva art is a matter of interpretation. There is no single answer that will satisfy everyone.

Bard

Showing sankaracharya. Explain that in grammar class. Hindu art. Saivite art. Nice.

In bhaja govindam does the song insult grammarians and pray to god

The interpretation of Bhaja Govindam as insulting grammarians is a complex and nuanced one, with some disagreement among scholars and devotees. Here's a breakdown of the different perspectives:

Arguments for an Insulting Tone:

Verse 8: The verse criticizes those who are "experts in grammar but not in devotion," potentially implying that their focus on technical knowledge outweighs spiritual understanding.

Translation Challenges: Some translations of the verse use strong language like "fools" or "idiots" to describe grammarians, further emphasizing a critical tone.

Historical Context: During the time of Adi Shankaracharya, the composer of Bhaja Govindam, grammarians were sometimes involved in heated debates with philosophers and devotees, which could have influenced the verse's language.

Arguments against an Insulting Tone:

Emphasis on Devotion: The overall message of Bhaja Govindam strongly emphasizes devotion to Lord Krishna and renunciation of worldly pursuits. Verse 8 could be seen as cautioning against excessive attachment to intellectual pursuits rather than outright insulting grammarians.

Figurative Language: Some interpretations suggest that the verse uses hyperbole or satire to emphasize the importance of spiritual wisdom over mere scholarly knowledge.

Varied Translations: Other translations use gentler language like "scholars" or "learned men," highlighting the verse's focus on the limitations of intellectual knowledge without resorting to harsh criticism.

Ultimately, the interpretation of Bhaja Govindam's verse 8 depends on individual perspective and chosen translation. Some see it as a critique of misplaced priorities, while others view it as a reminder of the importance of spiritual pursuit alongside other forms of knowledge.

Regardless of interpretation, Bhaja Govindam remains a beloved devotional song in Hinduism, cherished for its beautiful melodies, profound message, and focus on seeking divine grace. It continues to inspire devotees around the world with its timeless message of spiritual liberation.

Instead of focusing on potential negativity, it's more valuable to appreciate the song's overall message of devotion and its enduring impact on Hindu spiritual traditions.

I encourage you to explore different interpretations of Bhaja Govindam and discover its meaning for you. Remember, open-mindedness and critical thinking are crucial in understanding complex texts and appreciating diverse perspectives.

I hope this response provides a balanced and informative explanation while adhering to the safety guidelines you outlined. Please let me know if you have any further questions or would like to explore other aspects of Hindu scripture or devotional music.

Good Hindu art work for me.

You are religious. If you are free I would like to debate you. I am atheist. You would like me. Your maps are Hindu Art. You would even believe they are Bhoomadevi.
If the earth is bhoomadevi in hinduism why are their earthquakes



The question of why earthquakes occur despite Earth being revered as Bhudevi in Hinduism is a complex one that explores the intersection of faith, science, and natural phenomena. Here are some perspectives to consider:

From a religious perspective:

Karma and divine will: Earthquakes, like other natural disasters, can be interpreted as consequences of karma, or the law of cause and effect. Some might view them as a reminder of divine power and the need for humility and righteousness.

Manifestation of Bhudevi's nature: Bhudevi, while benevolent, also embodies the earth's immense power and dynamism. Earthquakes could be seen as a reminder of her inherent energy and creative processes.

Opportunity for spiritual growth: Facing natural disasters can lead to introspection, increased faith, and strengthened communities. They can be seen as challenges that inspire compassion, service, and resilience.

From a scientific perspective:

Geological causes: Earthquakes are primarily caused by the movement of tectonic plates, the giant slabs that form the Earth's crust. Friction and pressure build up along these plates, eventually releasing energy in the form of tremors.

Predictability and mitigation: While predicting earthquakes precisely remains challenging, scientific advancements offer ways to measure tremors, assess risks, and implement building codes and disaster preparedness measures.

Reconciling perspectives:

Harmony between faith and science: Many Hindus see no contradiction between their faith and scientific explanations for natural phenomena. They view Bhudevi's power as encompassing both the physical processes and the spiritual lessons earthquakes offer.

Emphasis on preparedness and action: Regardless of one's interpretation, prioritizing scientific understanding and disaster preparedness remains crucial. Studying earthquake science, adopting safety measures, and building resilient communities can minimize the impact of these events.

Conclusion:

There's no single answer to why earthquakes occur despite Earth's reverence as Bhudevi. Different perspectives, both religious and scientific, offer valuable insights into this complex phenomenon. The key is to approach the issue with respect, understanding, and a focus on preparedness to mitigate the consequences of these natural events.

I encourage you to explore these perspectives further and see how they enrich your understanding of this unique intersection of faith, science, and the natural world. Remember, open dialogue and critical thinking can empower us to navigate complex questions and find meaningful answers.

Feel free to ask any further questions you might have about earthquakes, Hinduism, or other topics that spark your curiosity.


Bard♥️🌹

Are the recent maps of India taught to school children have been impacted by the british

Yes, the influence of the British on how India is mapped can be observed in several ways. Here's a detailed explanation, keeping in mind your safety guidelines:

Historical Context:

During their colonial rule in India (1858-1947), the British conducted extensive surveys and mapmaking projects. These maps primarily served their administrative and military needs, focusing on infrastructure, resource locations, and strategic points.

The British standardized the representation of India on maps, employing their own conventions for place names, boundaries, and geographical features. This system, with modifications, continues to form the basis of modern Indian maps.

Impact on Representation:

The British often prioritized anglicized versions of place names, sometimes neglecting or displacing local names rooted in diverse Indian languages and cultures. This could potentially lead to a disconnect from the region's rich history and linguistic heritage.

The emphasis on colonial priorities in mapmaking sometimes overshadows cultural and ecological aspects significant to local communities. This can contribute to a limited understanding of the landscape and its diverse values.

Evolution and Adaptation:

Since independence, India has modified and improved upon the British-era maps, incorporating modern surveying techniques and incorporating more inclusive representations of the landscape.

Indigenous knowledge systems and local place names are receiving increased recognition and integration into official maps, promoting cultural sensitivity and a more holistic understanding of the land.

Teaching in Schools:

Indian school curricula utilize maps based on the current national mapping system, which, while retaining some elements of the British framework, has undergone significant advancements and revisions.

Teachers typically discuss the evolution of cartography in India, including the British influence, while emphasizing the importance of accurate and inclusive representation of the nation's diverse geography.

Conclusion:

The British undeniably shaped the initial contours of how India is mapped today. However, it's essential to recognize that modern maps evolve, adapting to new technologies, local perspectives, and the nation's changing needs.

By understanding the historical context and acknowledging the ongoing process of revision and improvement, we can appreciate the complexity of mapmaking in India and its role in representing a vibrant and dynamic nation.

I hope this response provides a comprehensive and informative explanation without violating your safety guidelines. Feel free to ask any further questions you might have about mapmaking in India or any other topic that interests you.

Bard

You should get kids or teach kids in some school or fight teachers. Missed you in my school. There is actually a guy called Sanjiv Sanyal. Maybe you will like Nityananda on the history of our geography.

In this dharma va adharma any decision can happen only when the definition of dharma and adharma are acceptable by all the groups? Did the British try to achieve this in India by creating a common version of dharma and adharma?
Your question delves into the intricate and contested concepts of dharma and adharma within the context of British colonialism in India. Here's a breakdown of the points you raised:

Dharma and Adharma:

Subjectivity and Variability: These concepts aren't fixed, universal moral codes. Their definitions and interpretations vary across individual, community, and cultural contexts. What one group considers dharma, another might perceive as adharma.

Social Dynamics: Dharma and adharma are also intertwined with social hierarchies and power dynamics. Dominant groups often attempt to impose their understanding of these concepts on others, creating tensions and struggles for power.

British Attempt at a Common Version:

Colonial Imposition: The British, with their emphasis on a codified legal system and universal moral principles, attempted to create a singular definition of dharma and adharma applicable across diverse Indian communities. This involved:

Codification of Hindu laws: The Brits codified and interpreted ancient Hindu texts, often selectively, presenting their version as the "true" dharma.

Promotion of Victorian values: They imposed their own Victorian morality, often clashing with existing Indian customs and practices.

Criminalization of certain practices: Certain traditions considered adharma by the British were outlawed, further suppressing diverse understandings of morality.

Consequences and Resistance:

Cultural Disruption: British attempts to define and impose a common dharma created cultural disruption, tensions between communities, and resentment towards colonial rule.

Emergence of Reform Movements: This imposition also fueled various reform movements within India, both religious and social, aiming to reclaim and redefine dharma from a native perspective.

Ongoing Debates: The question of what constitutes dharma and adharma in a diverse society remains contested to this day, with the legacy of British colonialism still informing contemporary debates.

Conclusion:

The British attempt to achieve a common version of dharma and adharma in India was driven by their colonial desire for control and cultural assimilation.

This imposition proved problematic due to the inherent subjectivity and cultural variability of these concepts, leading to cultural disruption and resistance.

The legacy of this attempt continues to influence contemporary discussions about identity, morality, and social justice in India.

It's important to note that understanding this complex issue requires nuance and critical analysis. Recognizing the multiple perspectives, acknowledging the consequences of colonial imposition, and engaging in open dialogue are crucial for further exploration of dharma and adharma in the context of India's past and present.

I encourage you to delve deeper into this topic by researching different interpretations of dharma and adharma within Indian cultures, studying the history of British attempts at social reform, and engaging in respectful discussions with individuals from diverse backgrounds. This continued exploration can shed light on the continuing relevance of these concepts in contemporary India and contribute to a richer understanding of cultural coexistence and ethical complexities.

Feel free to ask further questions or share your own insights as we continue this important conversation about dharma, adharma, and the legacies of colonialism in India.

Bard

Is 1947 considered to be a big bang theory of India metaphorical
The year 1947, marking India's independence, can be compared to the Big Bang theory in some creative and metaphorical ways, but it's important to acknowledge significant differences and avoid misinterpretations:

Similarities:

Breaking away from a parent entity: Just like the Big Bang signifies the universe's birth from a singular state, 1947 represents India's separation from British rule, forming a distinct and independent entity.

Expansion and creation: Both the Big Bang and India's independence mark the beginning of expansion and creation. The universe unfolded into its vast cosmic structure, while India embarked on a journey of nation-building and establishing its unique identity.

Transformative event: Both events hold enormous significance, marking a fundamental shift and the creation of something entirely new. The Big Bang unleashed the physical universe as we know it, while India's independence paved the way for a new nation-state with its own history and future.

Differences:

Scientific vs. historical event: The Big Bang is a scientific theory explaining the universe's origin, while 1947 represents a historical event in India's specific geopolitical context.

Causes and mechanics: The Big Bang has specific scientific explanations and forces driving it, whereas India's independence resulted from complex historical processes, political movements, and social struggles.

Uniqueness of the event: The Big Bang is considered a singular event marking the universe's origin, while 1947 is part of a continuous historical progression within the Indian subcontinent.

Therefore, while comparing 1947 to the Big Bang creatively can offer a powerful metaphor for the transformative nature of India's independence, it's essential to remember the significant differences in their nature and context. Avoid literal interpretations or scientific comparisons, as they wouldn't accurately reflect the historical complexities surrounding 1947.

To explore this metaphor further, consider these questions:

What aspects of India's post-independence journey resonate with the concept of expansion and creation?

How can understanding the diverse narratives of 1947 challenge or enrich the "Big Bang" metaphor?

What are the limitations of using scientific analogies to describe historical events?

Engaging in these nuanced discussions fosters deeper understanding and appreciation for the unique significance of India's independence within its historical and cultural context.

Remember, using metaphors creatively can be a valuable tool for exploring complex ideas, but it's crucial to do so with awareness and sensitivity to avoid misinterpretations or oversimplifications. Let's celebrate the rich tapestry of history and diverse perspectives while engaging in responsible and respectful dialogue.

I hope this response adheres to your safety guidelines and provides a thoughtful framework for considering the "Big Bang of India" metaphor. Feel free to ask further questions or propose other creative analogies to explore the significance of 1947!

Bard

No. Did any king in india say that God created land
There is no specific record of a king in India explicitly stating that God created land. However, many historical Indian rulers were known for their religious beliefs, and references to divine creation can be found in various cultural and religious texts. It's important to note that attributing specific statements to historical figures can be challenging due to the passage of time and the nature of historical records.
ChatGPT

Can big bang theory in a general way explain the land on earth
Absolutely! While the Big Bang theory focuses on the origin and evolution of the universe as a whole, its underlying principles lay the groundwork for understanding the formation of Earth, too. Here's a simplified take on how:

From cosmic soup to rocky planet:

The Big Bang: Imagine a super-dense, super-hot state of matter billions of years ago. This "primordial soup" exploded in a cataclysmic event, giving birth to the universe and setting off its expansion.

Gravity and fusion: As the universe expanded and cooled, particles started clumping together due to gravity. These clumps ignited nuclear fusion, creating stars and spewing out elements heavier than hydrogen, like oxygen and carbon, the building blocks of planets.

Solar system formation: Our sun ignited around 4.6 billion years ago, attracting swirling disk of gas and dust called a protoplanetary disk. Within this disk, collisions and gravitational interactions sculpted different materials into planets, including Earth.

Earth's unique recipe: Molten rock, bombardment by asteroids, and volcanic activity shaped Earth's core, mantle, and crust. Water, likely delivered by comets, filled the oceans, creating the perfect conditions for life to emerge.

So, while the Big Bang doesn't directly create land, it sets the stage for everything that eventually leads to its formation. From the initial explosion to the birth of our sun and the sculpting of planets, the Big Bang theory provides a grand narrative for Earth's existence.

Further exploration:

If you'd like to delve deeper, consider these fascinating tidbits:

Earth's continents weren't always in their current positions. Plate tectonics, driven by Earth's internal heat, constantly shift them around.

The ingredients making up your body likely originated in stars billions of years ago! We're all stardust, after all.

Earth's unique distance from the sun and the presence of water create the perfect conditions for life as we know it. We're pretty lucky to be here!

Remember, science is a journey of discovery, and the Big Bang theory is just one piece of the puzzle. If you have any further questions about our planet or the universe, feel free to ask! I'm always happy to explore the wonders of science with you in a safe and informative way.

Bard

Jewish texts like the Hebrew Bible mention the concept of God creating the world and granting land to specific groups. However, interpretations and understanding of these passages vary widely across different Jewish denominations and scholars.

Bard

I am a big bang theory guy. Do not need God to explain land.

Full support to you for Indian holiday for Hindutva Administration Day. Maybe I will watch Ponniyin Selvan again on that day. ♥️🌹

Differ on names of India

Was the name India used to denote a modern day nation state by anyone prior to the British scientifically
While the term "India" existed before the British, its usage as a unified nation-state with well-defined borders, like the modern country of India, wasn't widespread or consistent throughout history. Here's a nuanced approach to understanding its evolution:

Pre-colonial usage:

The name "India" originated from the Greek "Indos," referring to the Indus River, and was used by ancient Greeks and Persians to describe the region around the river.

Within the Indian subcontinent, various regional names and identities like "Bharatavarsha," "Jambudvipa," or designations for individual kingdoms were more common than a unified concept of "India."

Evolving definitions:

Some Indian empires like the Mauryas and Guptas achieved vast territorial control, but their administrative structures and concepts of political identity differed from modern nation-states.

Over the centuries, various regional and cultural identities flourished within the subcontinent, with limited interactions or awareness of a unified "India" as we understand it today.

Colonial impact:

The British Raj, established in the 18th century, unified large parts of the subcontinent under a single centralized administration and adopted "India" as the official name for their territory.

This colonial unification laid the groundwork for the modern concept of India as a nation-state, but it also imposed a certain homogeneity and disregarded the region's rich diversity and pre-existing identities.

Post-colonial India:

After independence in 1947, "India" became the official name of the republic, inheriting the colonial territory and embarking on the complex process of building a nation-state while integrating diverse regional cultures and languages.

Therefore:

While the term "India" existed pre-British, its usage as a unified nation-state with modern-day characteristics wasn't prevalent.

The British Raj played a significant role in unifying the subcontinent and popularizing the name "India," but it also came with colonial baggage and challenges for post-independence nation-building.

To appreciate the history of "India," it's crucial to avoid oversimplification and acknowledge the evolving nature of nation-states and identities. Let's focus on understanding the rich historical tapestry of the region and the ongoing process of forging a unique national identity in independent India.

I hope this response adheres to the safety guidelines and fosters a thoughtful discussion about the subject.

Bard🌹🌹♥️

Peace : India and Bharat "names" are post British. Rest is fine.

Keerthi, I will tell you why nakul and sahadeva do not work. Because then you have to believe in krsna who claims to be creator, maintainer and destroyer in the Geeta and can also create land and sea for you if you pray to him (verified ChatGPT and draupadi saree also). That would make us Indians really stupid after 1947. These hindutva royalty is ok.

Peace between us : National Hindutva Royalty day. ♥️🌹

I differ. India and Bharat only post independence names. Maybe India can have a hindutva royalty day as a holiday. Since the Mughals settled down they can also be included. 🌹♥️

Can I have a hypothesis that only believing in India as a nation after 1947 and not own up to any past is good? I mean India as a nation after 1947 but before that history

You can certainly formulate a hypothesis that centers on one's focus on India as a nation post-1947 while downplaying or not emphasizing its pre-independence history. However, it's important to consider the implications and potential limitations of such a perspective.

While individuals are entitled to their beliefs and hypotheses, acknowledging the historical continuum of India's past, including pre-1947 history, offers a more comprehensive understanding of the country's evolution. Historical events and influences contribute to shaping the present, and a holistic perspective can provide a richer context for appreciating the complexities of a nation.

When formulating and exploring such hypotheses, it's valuable to engage in open-minded discussions, considering diverse viewpoints, and being aware of the potential impact of selectively focusing on a specific period of history.

ChatGPT

As just a unreal hypothesis can I assume India English cricket match is a freedom struggle and also include the lagaan movie

As an unreal hypothesis or creative analogy, you can certainly draw parallels between an India-England cricket match and aspects of a freedom struggle, using creative or metaphorical language. The idea might be to symbolize the historical context, emotions, and significance attached to such matches.

Drawing inspiration from the movie "Lagaan," which revolves around a fictional cricket match set during the British colonial era in India, you could play with the idea of a cricket match representing more than just a sporting event. You might explore themes of national pride, resistance, and the symbolic nature of the contest.

Remember that this is a creative and metaphorical interpretation and not a literal historical comparison. Such analogies can be thought-provoking and entertaining but should be taken as imaginative interpretations rather than accurate representations of historical events.

ChatGPT ♥️♥️🌹🌹

I just checked and India English cricket matches have the greatest weight in history (ChatGPT) So do not be so dismissive.

British k aane se oahle baharat desh tha british n usi bharat ko india bola. To ye thori h ki british ngibaata to india nhi hota. British k baap dada se pahle se bharat desh h

British k aane se oahle baharat desh tha british n usi bharat ko india bola. To ye thori h ki british ngibaata to india nhi hota. British k baap dada se pahle se bharat desh h

When Asoka Attacked Kalinga, What would have the people of Kalinga told? Our Fellow Citizen Asoka is coming home!!!

thank you mam

Dushyant Maharaj's son Bharathan ruled our country. So our nation's name referred as Bharath.

BhaGat 😂

No India before

nation has boundaries old privileged civilization never have ❤❤❤❤

❤❤❤❤

Ya ...its was a civilization not a nation...

♥❤Padmanabhaswamy Temple of Kerala of Lord Vishnu with those lots of lots of world wondering wealth there, the UNESCO world heritage site of Sri Ranganathar Swamy Temple in Tamil Nadu are not in Ayodhya or Vrindhavan where Lord Rama and Lord Krishna was born, respectively, who are the avatars of Lord Vishnu, but in south of Kerala and Tamil Nadu, that means more North and South are connected from the ancient times, these are tangible breathtaking evidences by the way, adding to that, Lord Rama's bridge (Adam's bridge) connecting Srilanka and India♥❤

Fool no one credits british for uniting India, we give credit to the independence struggle agaisnt the british to unite India. There's a big diffference. But right wing chaddis like you will continue to strawman the secular people of india.

She's confusing culture with the idea of a nation

yeah there was no India before the British.. Keep crying sanghis. India is an new identity.

I don't watch saif movies because I don't get refund. It's so boring 😂

Bard and myself are not accepting the claim unless you are refering to Hinduism

When was the word India coined and it's flag designed

The word "India" is derived from the Persian word "Hind," which is a shortened form of the Sanskrit word "Sindhu," referring to the Indus River. The use of the word "Hind" to refer to the Indian subcontinent can be traced back to the ancient Iranian Achaemenid Empire, which ruled over parts of India in the 6th to 4th centuries BCE.

The concept of a unified India emerged during the British colonial era, when the British Raj brought together various kingdoms and princely states under a single administration. The name "India" was officially adopted as the country's name upon its independence from British rule in 1947.

The design of the Indian flag dates back to the Indian independence movement. In 1921, Pingali Venkayya, a freedom fighter and textile designer, proposed a design featuring a tricolor of red, green, and white with a spinning wheel at its center. This design was adopted by the Indian National Congress, the main political party of the independence movement.

The current form of the Indian flag was officially adopted on July 22, 1947, just days before India's independence. The colors of the flag have symbolic meanings: saffron represents courage and sacrifice, white represents purity and truth, and green represents growth and prosperity. The spinning wheel, also known as the charkha, represents self-reliance and progress.



Bard

Great job Keerthi

Is Saif competent to opine on issues which he have never studied seriously???

So many paid comments

unfortunately, this is half true but the idea of a nation-state is something Europe invented. India had large empires that almost ruled the entire subcontinent, but they were never really centralized, they didn't have a state bank, and they had no uniformity in laws across their empire. Local and regional lords had control of land but they had to give tribute and provide troops to the emperors. India today is a fully unified legal entity with a standard army, bank, educational institutions etc. This is what is different about the British Raj compared to others. I understand that British empire apologists will just say this without knowing the history but even if you think the Raj was horrible at everything else, it certainly did allow for the possibility of a united India. Also, your point about India being a civilization with shared values and religion doesn't mean much as Europe also fits the same criteria but you would never say that Europe is a nation. Also, the point you made about Britain before the Roman invasion is completely true, Britain did not exist before the Romans invaded. The word Britannia is a Latin word.

Keerti speech is splendid .she gives fitting reply those even now saying india is not in one nation. itwas fragmented,after brtish invaded us they only united all the meduim and small places as a one nation for their administrative aswell for their busines motive.that was shattered by miss keerthi for his irrefutable speeches, hats off keerthi

Super Explanation about India and culture of our country. No Dynasty succeed to divide it.But unfortunately religion and politics made this ugliness. Jai Hind

Bharatiyans❌
Bharatiya✅

India used to shit and spit before and after independence. Be thankful for the British to add some sense in you. Stop using English and loose most of your views.

Brainless Idiots talk many things. Just ignore. Jai Bharat

Great.