Debunking Jon Stewart's Attack On The 2nd Amendment During Viral Debate With Republican Senator

So jon, if the second amendment is canceled, how long do you think the rest of our given rights will last as we know our government is so trusted!

I believe that those who are against guns are people who have never been robbed, assaulted or have called 911 while someone was trying to break into their home.
(911 response time average is 10 to 18 minutes...., think about that)

This is such an unbelievably black and white issue and it kills me that people don't understand it. If the government are the only people with guns, you live in an authoritarian state. Just because they aren't actively abusing their power right now doesn't mean they can't change their mind in 1 second.

I lost all respect for John Stewart after this

If a person is legally able to vote, that person must be able to own and carry arms. Both must have knowledge to do so.

Well regulated is the government. The goverment must be well regulated. The people are free to throw the elected out.

Yeah, it’s actually pretty impressive of how much of a pseudo intellectual this guy is. The evil thing about him is I believe that he knows what he’s doing is completely skewed, that’s why he chooses to debate people like this. He wouldn’t have a debate with Ben Shapiro in 1 million years, and if he did, his smug days of smelling his own farts would be over.

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍🇺🇸
Thank you for being such a loud voice for the 2nd amendment. You do it so well. Please don't stop.🇺🇸

Look at Australia how successful gun regulation works. Founding fathers called for a citizens to bear arms for those in a militia only and immediately had laws regulated guns that didn’t allow African Americans or native Americans to have guns, those who committed certain crimes the inability to bear arms, and scatterguns and extra long hunting rifles.

On top of that, the ability to “bear arms” was ONLY meant to be used in a military/militia capacity not in self-defense.

The 2nd amendment is the only right that people always take the text literally and don’t allow for interpretation, something goes against the essence of the founding fathers. I do not agree with the banning of all weapons, but there is absolutely no need for weapons like the AR to be circulated in the public and up until the 2000’s it was taboo to even be brought to a gun show. It’s a shame that this has become so politicized that as a nation we would rather live in some hypothetical world of “what if’s” and being so scared of the future that we are not doing all we can do in the present to save our loved ones.

Jon needs to be a comedian he's not good at that but it doesn't hurt people

Jon Stewart is like wet toast.....

all that guy did was try to put words in the 2A defenders mouth my goodness this wasn't a conversation it was a one sided argument

why does this guy keep saying we do not do background checks. What state does not require a background check?

“This second amendment we are talking about” - John Stuart

Stewart is against illegal immigrant registration but for registration of firearms owned by non-criminal citizens. What a statist lackey.

Funny man speak! I listen!

Why don't you debate against Jon Stewart? You're a smart guy. He's a smart guy. You should do it.

Why would anyone take seriously anything Stewart says about the 2nd? He has no idea what he is talking about, as usual.

Let’s use an youth (HS) age bullying as an analogy. The argument could be made to ban sports because their is a correlation between athlete and bully, albeit small. So, some ball star picks on a kid. Should we ban sports? Or is the flaw in the bully’s character? Banning sports would displace how many kids who are not bullies? And add to the obesity rates and mental health issues. Similarly banning guns is a pointless endeavor that in my humble opinion would do more harm than good as evidenced in the problematic cuties that are highly regulated. I have a FAFO demeanor. I am armed and when deescalation is not an option and the lives of those I care about are on the line, then you can bet I relish my 2A rights.

Jon Stewart needs to leave America, the sooner the better. . There are plenty of countries he would love. We could even pool some money for his one way ticket !

Jon should stick with comedy and maybe
singing🎶 or 🙉🙊🙈 Thanks Colin

He's ineffective at debate against Stewart

Colion you are the man! We appreciate all that you do for all of us 2A people out here. I wish John Stewart would have u on. Thanks again sir!!

In response to more guns = more safety he says "when? 400m guns and gun deaths are going up" yet that argument can be used against gun control. If gun control works to keep us safe, when? The US currently has more gun regulations than ever before, yet by his own words, gun deaths are still going up.

Jon is very disrespectful, he doesn’t let the senator speak. BTW, the ammosexual t-shirt is awesome.

F john he is all over the map. A true hypocrite.

it pisses me off that NO ONE is Answering Jon Hitler Stewart with the police at the House........if the police are at the House for a Domestic (as a former reserve police officer) there is a good chance that this is NOT the 1st time they have been here for a domestic, and it is a federal crime for someone convicted of a domestic to have a firearm ALREADY !!! and if the police are at your house and FEAR your Guns, they usually have a REASON because you are NOT A LAW ABIDING PERSON !!!

Just found your channel today and have watched several of your videos. Thank you for your channel. Finally someone who gets it! Gun control does not help the law abiding people it only hurts them. I have said for decades now that criminals do not care about a freaking piece of paper yet there are still too many who don't get it. I'm really glad to see someone well spoken who actually knows their stuff. Keep up the good work Colin!

That comes from someone who has a regulated amount of intelligence!

I have a gun debate in class next week, what are some things I can say along with some good rebuttals against gun control?

I absolutely hate John Stewart way to “debate”.

I would love to see Jon Stewart debate someone like Colion. Oh wait... he would never do that because he knows Colion would hand him his ass on a platter. Easily!

Oklahoma =Freedom

Well Colion's arguments are cherry picked and weak at best. #1 going back and debating what "well regulated" meant is irrelevant for a few reasons, history is not on the side of the new 2A, everyone gets a gun idea. "For over 200 years after the adoption of the Second Amendment, it was uniformly understood as not placing any limit on either federal or state authority to enact gun control legislation," Retired Justice Stevens. The US during those 200 years of precedent regulated guns and who has access to them, beginning at the state level from southern states if you can believe it. It's not until the last few decades did right wing judges push to change precedent, once court ruling in 2028.
Another reality, the 2A is not set in stone, the constitution was meant to be a document to evolve as society and the times evolve. The 2A can be changed or revoked through the constitutional process but no one is even talking about that. The conversation is about responsible gun ownership and keeping guns out of those hands who shouldn't have them but people like Colion corrupt the conversation of responsible gun ownership. Private purchases, gun shows, online purchases, all can be done without background checks and some backgrounds differ. Thanks to Trump since 2016 people with Mental illness can now get a firearm legally where before they couldn’t.
Colion’s camp and his mentality is in the minority, 80% of responsible gun owners want more regulation, law enforcement want more regulation and the amount of gun deaths and mass shootings in the US demand it. We aren’t in fear of the government taking our guns and we don’t really care as gun owners if it takes a little more effort to purchase a gun they point and click off the internet.

Ukraine had gun ban. They in war for awhile now. Now the dummy's are telling citizens they gonna give back. The 2nd amendment was so citizens can protect themselves from this type of bull s. And in case of an invasion from another country like what happened years ago. Thats why countries won't come invade us. Cause everybody got guns. Ukraine ban guns no one had guns. Easy invasion. Besides is guns are outlawed only outlaws will have will have guns.

It’s not that they’ve “removed” background checks, it’s that they’ve prevented people from making them more extensive. Psyche evals, red flag laws, have both been prevented and those are the policies that catch potential bad guys

In terms of the well regulated portion of the 2nd Amendment, it does mean properly trained and disciplined. Constitutional carry does not provide for that. So "Noir" be sure to promote that aspect of responsible gun ownership first and foremost. Then you'll have less pushback from the Jon Stewarts of the world. Obviously registration should be a non starter, but the gun community real should be & can be more responsible. Just do it.

Your argument shows your double standards. You claim good people are being denied guns, yes but if theae good people pass a backround and have taken gun saftey courses they have no problem getting that gim when they do it legally right?? So is this same princible you claim should be imposed at the border you all say they can come to our counrty as long as they donit legally.

More specifically, in this case it meant “uniformly equipped”. “Regulated” in this case like a voltage regulator that keeps the voltage uniform, or the “same”.

Yet we're the only country that has mass shooting problem. After one mass shooting in Australia they turned in their guns. You can still have them but you have to apply. And they don't have a crime problem or a 2nd mass shooting. Just because you can list other ways people die doesn't mean you shouldn't stop other causes. P.S gun owner and pro background, red flag, and magazine limits. P.S dickey amendment made it illegal for federal funds to research gun crimes. Sen Dickey now publicly regretted it

"It means you don't have an individual right to own firearms."

Guess what? Lots of individuals own firearms. Next.

I understand what Stewart is coming from but the constitution is clearly stated what the second Amendment. He's still wrong

look what happens to countrys who are not allowed to have firearms. ukraine ? brazil? israel ? all of those countrys had some of the most brutal killings you could ever go through. all becuse none of them were armed like america. there are more guns than people in america and 90% of those shootings are from criminals who arent allowed to have a gun but still get 1 off the streets wich were stolen from law abiding people.

Tell Jon his security can no longer be armed.

Colin seems like a nice guy. But after listening to the entire video, I think he's wrong about just about everything he criticized Jon Stewart on.

Registration leeds to confiscation!

Lets ban unfunny comedians,stewart

If anything, freedom of speech is the most powerful thing one can have. cause somewhere someone is listening to this idiot talk. And they can be expired to go out and do something. Why get your hands dirty? You can send somebody else in your place.

Well Jon Stewart well-regulated militia has nothing to do with the government regulating anyting it has to do with the militia regulating itself and making sure it's well regulated has nothing to do with State sticking their nose in or the government sticking their nose in because the government or the states have no power to stick their nose into the Second Amendment amendment was made by we the people just like the rest of the Constitution was so therefore I say the whole democratic government including the rhinos be brought up on charges for going against every aspect of the Constitution

2nd Amendment myth: Guns will prevent tyranny. Yea, what modern democracy did that happen in. Rambo fairy tale.