The Buran: The Soviet Union's Suspiciously Familiar-Looking Space Shuttle

The Buran: The Soviet Union's Suspiciously Familiar-Looking Space Shuttle

Megaprojects

2 года назад

403,426 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

Acuraman68
Acuraman68 - 26.09.2023 05:18

Whelp! Why buy a Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing when the superior engineering of the Lada Vesta is there for the taking. 🍿

Ответить
Gilles Jacques
Gilles Jacques - 24.09.2023 23:09

It's sad to see what happened to the craft after, should have been put in a safe place, so at least it could have been remembered as what could have been.

Ответить
CinemaDemocratica
CinemaDemocratica - 15.09.2023 05:04

The US Space Shuttle program was never classified. One later NASA administrator said, in an interview, "If they had written to us and asked for the plans, we would have sent them everything."

Ответить
Gordon Bradley
Gordon Bradley - 04.09.2023 00:20

The Buran could tae off and land entirely automatically !
And it did !

Ответить
Gothicgirl
Gothicgirl - 25.08.2023 02:10

That Marie antoinette cake thing is a lie

Ответить
Bill Seidel
Bill Seidel - 21.08.2023 03:14

Well, I couldn't build one, so respect to anyone that can.. 😅😅

Ответить
シュリニバス・スワミ
シュリニバス・スワミ - 12.08.2023 18:51

ये टकला रशिया से इतना जलता हैं.

Ответить
Noke
Noke - 12.08.2023 03:52

Everything they have is a copy of western things except, for some reason, the cars. Those buckets they design/build themselves.

Ответить
bisembert
bisembert - 08.08.2023 05:28

The Buran shuttle was light years better than the Yank shuttle, the yanks attempted to copy the Buran.

Ответить
Pazhampori
Pazhampori - 12.07.2023 05:15

Ha ha still the stupid commies lost

Ответить
Thomas Hooks
Thomas Hooks - 01.06.2023 16:41

Every time I watch one of these cold war era videos I can't help but wonder what the US and the Soviets could have achieved if they had been able to work together. But then, again I guess the competition was the key.

Ответить
Thomas Hooks
Thomas Hooks - 01.06.2023 16:39

Ev

Ответить
Frederik Hein
Frederik Hein - 31.05.2023 17:17

The Buran most definitely was not a rip-off. Whilst its outer appearance is very similar to to that of the Spaceshuttle for reasons addressed in the video (spying and aerodynamics), the interior and especially the propulsion system was a lot different. As partially explained in the video, the Spaceshuttle had its main engines used for the ascend to orbit on itself and just carried a huge external fuel tank, as well as boosters to aid on lift-off, under its belly. Buran however was strapped to the side of an independent rocket that in fact could also carry other payloads. Buran only had smaller orbital maneuvering engines for changing orbit and de-orbiting for return to earth. In this sense it’s more similar to the x 37. It should also not be forgotten that in fact the US copied earlier sovjet space plane designs that would later evolve into the Spaceshuttle and resembled the Dreamchaser spacecraft currently being developed by SNC.

Ответить
Ken Smith
Ken Smith - 29.05.2023 03:01

Buran also has the "the second mouse gets the cheese" advantage. The USSR got to see the errors the US made.

Ответить
Jeff Sartain
Jeff Sartain - 23.05.2023 23:00

Too bad that Russia could not have placed it into a museum for preservation and historical purposes.

Ответить
m341ehw
m341ehw - 23.05.2023 02:41

I'm very... very late to the party.... Rip off not..... yet stolen! well at least the stats!

Ответить
Naduron0
Naduron0 - 22.05.2023 18:04

you have never heard of project Star Wars that USA plans to weaponize space above earth with weapons that aims for USSR.. -.-

Ответить
Philip Williams
Philip Williams - 21.05.2023 21:32

na...it was in fact a NASA ripoff. there is no denying it. sure they made tweaks to it, but they got it from spying, as you said.

Ответить
Michael Coffee
Michael Coffee - 18.05.2023 22:29

Of course it's a copy.
They only had to create what they couldn't copy.

Ответить
Otto Normalverbrauch
Otto Normalverbrauch - 18.05.2023 10:08

20 metres shorter?! More like 90 cm.

Ответить
onetimer44
onetimer44 - 18.05.2023 02:07

Your dimension are WAY OFF. Length and wingspan between the Buran and the shuttle are less than a meter. as well the weight. It was 53 tons.

Ответить
Greg M.
Greg M. - 17.05.2023 23:00

From what I understand, The soviets got caught with their hands in the cookie jar and we started feeding them false information.

Ответить
Manny Tang
Manny Tang - 17.05.2023 05:35

Did the CCCP used ChatGPT back then the build the Buran?

Ответить
30 And Hating It
30 And Hating It - 16.05.2023 04:43

Ford: Steals plans for the Silverado
Ford: “Introducing the new Golderado!”
Chevy: Bro, seriously? Copy cat much?
Ford: “No copy, there’s more cupholders.”

Can we stop acting like the Soviets didn’t essentially do exactly this with the shuttle? I mean they did the exact same thing when they straight up made copies of the B-29 a few decades prior.

Ответить
G. L.
G. L. - 16.05.2023 04:18

Could you please post a giant sign behind the camera reminding you to SLOW THE FREAK DOWN!

Ответить
Scott Field
Scott Field - 16.05.2023 03:49

The first US space shuttle was the Enterprise. The Columbia was to replace the Challenger

Ответить
DarkStar2077
DarkStar2077 - 16.05.2023 00:53

The US copied them
It was photographed 3 years before and a shipment of the engine was intercepted and stripped down by the US

Didn’t watch the video but if he tells you different then he is a liar or a poor researcher

Ответить
Chris F
Chris F - 16.05.2023 00:40

R&D = research and duplicate

Ответить
P Harger
P Harger - 15.05.2023 17:10

One of the things that make it so interesting to watch for example Scott Manley's work, is that he doesn't do the childish jokes, or have the incessant mocking tone, that this guy does... or base his shows off of an hour or so of web browsing and checking wikipedia...

Scott gives a lot of detailed information, does a lot of research, and gives everything a balanced analysis... Highly recommend we all go watch him instead :)

Ответить
Michael Proctor
Michael Proctor - 14.05.2023 06:21

Actually the shuttle plans were not classified and easy for them to find. The Buran was a version 2 craft. They had the benefit of hindsight while developing the craft. The Energia was also not designed to carry their shuttle, it was adapted and was a better design than the shuttle launch system.

Ответить
Terry C
Terry C - 13.05.2023 13:44

The Buran wasn't any different than most Soviet era tech. Stolen, backward engineered proprietary technology that was simplified for less maintenance. The Russians had a lot of strengths but imagination wasn't one of them.

Ответить
Armorer 94
Armorer 94 - 13.05.2023 11:02

Okay, it's a semi-ripoff.

Ответить
Wendy sanders
Wendy sanders - 12.05.2023 10:37

The only time I've heard of the Buran is in the novel “Back to the Moon”, written by Homer Hickam (yes, the same man from the movie “October Sky”, where he’s portrayed by Jake Gyllenhaal). In the novel, after the shuttle pilot is accidentally killed, another NASA astronaut hitches a ride in a Russian Soyuz, accompanied by a cosmonaut who was trained to pilot the Buran. The cosmonaut ends up landing the shuttle at the end of the story.

Ответить
Biden Sucks
Biden Sucks - 12.05.2023 09:05

The biggest difference between the shuttle and Buran is that the shuttle actually flew.

Ответить
Dominick Mastri
Dominick Mastri - 12.05.2023 05:12

shut up

Ответить
Steven Clark
Steven Clark - 10.05.2023 23:32

No disrespect to American designers, but.. it's not like the shuttle was that 'unique' of a design. I mean... most planes look pretty similar.. buses, cars, etc. Then of course there is the Wheel.. lol. The Russians beat us into space; lets not presume they couldn't come up with a 'shuttle design' on their own

Ответить
help8help
help8help - 10.05.2023 16:45

What a loving tribute to the long lost Soviet Union. It was so good the Democrats are currently trying to duplicate its utopian perfection right here in the US.
/sarcasm
Evil always finds a way

Ответить
jimmymcgoochie
jimmymcgoochie - 10.05.2023 14:56

Buran had a lot going for it: jet engines for atmospheric flight, much better orbital engines than the Shuttle and in a better position, the Energia rocket could launch on its own with payloads on the side rather than Buran and there was even talk of making the four boosters recoverable by deploying big wings and flying them to a runway.
Unfortunately it has no real purpose and a few key disadvantages compared to the Shuttle too: the Shuttle brought the expensive booster engines back with it whereas Energia was expended each time it launched, the Shuttle’s disposable bits were much cheaper to make than Energia and the huge expense of making Buran with all its advanced features probably played a not inconsequential role in the ultimate collapse of the USSR.

Ответить
Marcin
Marcin - 09.05.2023 20:05

It's a copy! Like many soviet planes ☹️ red army, red disease 🤮

Ответить
Samuel Rivera
Samuel Rivera - 09.05.2023 19:56

Well, let's hear what type of soviet propaganda you spew. You apologist for commies. Ha ha ha ha ha.

Ответить
Hilu Piano Service
Hilu Piano Service - 09.05.2023 06:01

The jet engines were used so that pilots could take off like a regular aircraft for landing tests. Initially, the pilots flew all the way to wheelstop, but near the end of the tests, the pilots only brought the plane to altitude and the computers landed it hands off.

Ответить
A.Sweden
A.Sweden - 08.05.2023 16:05

I think they copied the aerodynamics to save time and effort, but this was not a 1 to 1 copy. The rocket engines/propellant were totally different too.

Ответить
KrysB
KrysB - 08.05.2023 15:44

I remember watching the first space shuttle launch.
I was in the 5th grade when Columbia blew up.

Ответить
will i amnot
will i amnot - 07.05.2023 14:09

No it’s not a copy. It’s coincidental. 😂😂😅😂🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣😂🤣😂😂😂😂🤣🤣😂😂😎

Ответить
Rogue_One
Rogue_One - 07.05.2023 08:32

The Soviet Union collapsed? You better look again, with a dictator in power for about 20 years that kills anyone who runs against him, id call that communism.

Ответить