Mustafa Suleyman: The AI Pioneer Reveals the Future in 'The Coming Wave' | Intelligence Squared

Mustafa Suleyman: The AI Pioneer Reveals the Future in 'The Coming Wave' | Intelligence Squared

Intelligence Squared

10 месяцев назад

196,956 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

Revival Repeat
Revival Repeat - 02.10.2023 01:48

Heading to 666

Ответить
Netanel Aker
Netanel Aker - 01.10.2023 23:34

The man that creates A.I tries to warn as how A.I is scary...

Oh the irony.

Ответить
Knight Oyin
Knight Oyin - 01.10.2023 22:33

Demonizes China? Is he serious? Wow!
He should go live there and find out.

Ответить
ThomasPolega
ThomasPolega - 01.10.2023 22:22

He’s just wrong about China, dangerously naive.

Ответить
Joseph Van Name
Joseph Van Name - 01.10.2023 19:28

Please be quiet about AI. You need to learn about reversible computing.

Ответить
I A
I A - 01.10.2023 11:29

There's no evidence that the elites at the helm of AI are going to democratise the fruits of AI. It's human nature. Ask youraelf this do you really think that the elites and coorperations would be developing a technology like this if their goal was to create universal abundance for everyone? They're driven to createe this by nassive financial incentive, in the 1st place.

Ответить
Aiesha Nichole Oliver
Aiesha Nichole Oliver - 01.10.2023 03:23

My preteen son and I were not talking about this man. We were speaking about Suleiman the Great. He doesn't work in AI! To be stuck in a time warp is to abuse human rights of a black woman and her children to brag about technology. Such misogyny...I am so disgusted by this level of grifting to hurt black women. Do you see what Britian does to blacks. Atheist!? Does he not realize how his own people are profiled and ridiculed. Smh. Disgusting. Money, money. You are a disgrace to Islam and the Arab world.

Ответить
jay hill
jay hill - 01.10.2023 01:24

Jeremy Lanier is critical of ubi. Something obviously needs to happen. But his view is those systems that are created become giant targets of corruption.

Ответить
Laurence Bernadac
Laurence Bernadac - 01.10.2023 00:19

This man is all about productivity and commercial matters ...

Ответить
clavo
clavo - 30.09.2023 23:43

At 68 I'm too damned impatient to wait for the substantive material.

Ответить
Twin Soul Tarot
Twin Soul Tarot - 30.09.2023 21:28

No, AI is not going to kill us; WORSE IT'S GOING TO TAKE ALL OUR JOBS LOL 😆 It really is.

Ответить
nobody u know
nobody u know - 30.09.2023 18:12

Designers have already lost their jobs. Concept artists, matte painters.

Ответить
Manu Bobola
Manu Bobola - 30.09.2023 16:50

Israel is the other state using large scale surveillance apparatus enabled by AI (Aljajeera, Israel's Automated Surveillance of Palestinians). I am not sure about China, because what we hear and read about is polluted by Western propaganda against China.

Ответить
holger jørgensen
holger jørgensen - 30.09.2023 12:40

AI is Doomed, it is Superstition and Illiteracy
to believe that Intelligence can be artificial.
'Intelligence squared', might be result of lack of Intelligence,
but it sounds smart, 'the artificial intelligence revolution',
there is No such thing, it is Low-Intellectual mind-set.

Language without Mathematic, is Not a Language,
and Mathematic without Language, is Not Mathematic.

So, the digital develoment, is about Conscious Programming,
and Programmed Consciousness.

Intelligence is a Eternal Ability, means Logic and Order.
The Perspective-Princip, means All Relations Relation-ship.
Intelligence + Perspective-Princip = Mathematic.

Ответить
Ian Coles
Ian Coles - 30.09.2023 02:56

Why would the rich care.The deman seed is so appealing 😊

Ответить
Andre Marks
Andre Marks - 30.09.2023 00:19

What's the name of this show host?

Ответить
Michele Holmes
Michele Holmes - 29.09.2023 19:17

How do you regulate ideas for the good when algorithmicly, any intent can be facilitated on a screen at the tips of your fingers

Ответить
Michael Pickles
Michael Pickles - 29.09.2023 14:15

Even though the host speaker has read the book it seems she doesn't understand AI and hackers. Some kid in a garage really...

As for corporations and governments dominating AI. The track record speaks for itself in their responsibility.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Ответить
Alexis Tinsley Pope
Alexis Tinsley Pope - 29.09.2023 12:57

It is not a revolution, it is a dumbing down, a type of totalitarian vetting and controlling of what knowledge seems to be and how it can be/should be interpreted by those who make the decisions about what should be included in the data banks and their programmers. Information (vetted, interpreted and censored data) when recycled as AI is passed on to an unsuspecting public, and when such information is quoted or used in the real world, the AI technology will come to colonize the minds of all those who use it. AI will actually REDUCE knowledge and opinions, it will turn everyone who depends on its capabilities into limited thinkers who will, over time, as the influence of AI increases, metamorphize into non-thinking individuals, zombies, who, through access to their precious AI will believe themselves educationally and morally superior to those who do not have such access, while the reality of the situation will be the complete opposite.

Ответить
Aminatu Yusuf
Aminatu Yusuf - 29.09.2023 11:43

Nice

Ответить
p s
p s - 29.09.2023 09:32

We did not allow human inteligence.. we did not allow to cure diseases and apply perfect therapies that cure cancer or allowed even simple comerce and forbbid subjets in universities and media. Inteligence has been forbbiden since at leadt 2000 years so, why shoud AI be alliwed and able to apply knowledge if not even the media is alliwed to talk free or entrepeneurs allowed to create innovative buissnes? If HI has been forbbiden threw deadly force, why should who ever rules the world allow AI?

Ответить
Alicia Markoe
Alicia Markoe - 29.09.2023 05:30

Thank you 🦋

Ответить
ABCD
ABCD - 28.09.2023 22:27

A discussion between him and Prof. Yuval Noah Harari would be very helpful to understand both opinions on this issue.

Ответить
Daniel Corona
Daniel Corona - 28.09.2023 18:16

He should of stayed on the help lines counselling people, instead getting involved in the stupidity and madness of you people.

Ответить
Kawtar Essabbah
Kawtar Essabbah - 28.09.2023 17:33

Where's my comment bitchzzz

Ответить
Kawtar Essabbah
Kawtar Essabbah - 28.09.2023 17:30

I think we Can give it a systematic program like religion to minimize the reactive revolution

Ответить
Olugbenga Bamidele
Olugbenga Bamidele - 27.09.2023 22:56

The joy of human lives is work and not pleasure and ease. human work not for money but it gives them purpose and fulfilment. So when AI take that work away and makes man inefficient and almost irrelevant. Then we know there's trouble

Ответить
Olugbenga Bamidele
Olugbenga Bamidele - 27.09.2023 22:51

High on the positive low on the negatives, in thousands of programers will loose there jobs to AI, software developers, website designers, artists, teachers, writers even common farmers will find it difficult to compete with AI. I can say AI poses imminent threat to human race and civilization

Ответить
אדוארד בר
אדוארד בר - 27.09.2023 22:20

A I is from satan 😂

Ответить
ShutIn Alley
ShutIn Alley - 27.09.2023 22:19

Can't wait for these technologies to revolutionize our travel. We need to bring the world to people. A stagnant population is like stagnant water. It gets icky. Our job is to maintain the variety of life this planet can produce.

Ответить
João de Carvalho
João de Carvalho - 27.09.2023 19:09

Dude, it doesn't matter what the Chinese want. The only thing that matters there is what Xi Jinping wants, and at this point I don't think he's thinking straight. When you are the most powerful man in the world, your view of things changes.

Ответить
Chen William
Chen William - 27.09.2023 13:14

Machine Learning is not AI,
please modify
'Are we...... to AI revolution'
instead of
'Are we...... to' Machine Learning' revolution 😊

Ответить
Kim Mathewson
Kim Mathewson - 27.09.2023 11:38

From : james h. mathewson sr.

Woe unto them that decree 📜 unrighteous decrees, and write ✍️ grievousness which they have prescribed.
To turn aside the needy from Justice, and take away what is right from the poor of ✨GODS✨ people !! that widows may be their pray (victims) and so they may rob the fatherless !!! What will y'all do in your day of punishment !!!!!!! And the desolation that will soon come upon you from afar ... to whom shall ye flee for help ... where do you leave your glory ? Y'all will bow down under the prisoner, and fall under the slain.
For with all this the
🕊️✨LORD GODS✨🕊️
🔥🔥ANGER🔥🔥
🔥🔥🔥
is not turned away but
stretched 🫵😤☝️out still
in
🔥🔥JUDGEMENT🔥🔥
🔥🔥🔥

Ответить
Antonio Ramirez
Antonio Ramirez - 27.09.2023 11:18

Ai wont make humans more inteligent, infact will make us more dumb.

Ответить
Antonio Ramirez
Antonio Ramirez - 27.09.2023 11:14

Exactly the same promises and false expectetions with each tecnical revolutions thruout history , and yet this world and modern societies are upside down in all aspects of life.

Ответить
AI OPENKNOWLEDGES
AI OPENKNOWLEDGES - 27.09.2023 09:25

Hey guys! I really liked this video and I thought I should share my own channel with you all. I made videos about "AI OPENKNOWLEDGES". If you are interested, please watch this video of mine, “ ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTH CARE ”. It will give you the most positive motivation to conquer the peak. I think you will like it! After you watch this video, let me know what you think!!!

Ответить
La Mel
La Mel - 27.09.2023 08:31

People are worried about the potential loss of the means for a decent life style rather than the loss of labour hours. We’d love to work only a small fraction of the hours we’ve been working up to now for the same income.

Ответить
Tarchearkhè
Tarchearkhè - 27.09.2023 06:51

I made the same pitch 7 years ago . Différence ? Now it seems really possible to do , close to thé Sci-Fi, all of this thanks to Generative AI.

Ответить
Patrick Karnwie
Patrick Karnwie - 27.09.2023 04:49

No one can control ai better than i am.

Ответить
Barry Rimmer
Barry Rimmer - 26.09.2023 23:28

The United Kingdom has already liberated 'those who choose' from the obligation to work. 😉We call it 'Social Security', and it is indeed a redistribution via taxation. What's new?

Ответить
Jayson P
Jayson P - 26.09.2023 23:23

I'm actively building autonomous AI that can basically do any job and there are thousands of people like me so don't trust executives when they say jobs will disappear in years. Within a year most jobs will start disappearing.

Ответить
Jered كرم
Jered كرم - 26.09.2023 22:57

Will apple 🍎 soon buy the pie 🥧? And name it apple pie ?

Ответить
Tom Armstrong
Tom Armstrong - 26.09.2023 20:28

Like all significant technological advances that have streamlined industrial and commercial activities, the benefits have asymmetrically benefitted various sections of society. In plain language, the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer. I do not see that situation changing much in the immediate future here or in any other country. A situation which spells trouble.

Ответить
Charles Brown
Charles Brown - 26.09.2023 18:30

Civilization may have progressed enough to conquer the second law of thermodynamics. Civilization needs to strive for this goal with synergistic interdisciplinary teams.The outcome would be perpetually changeable never gained or lost energy.

Conservation of energy says nothing about energy distribution. With this principe only, the heat in a pair of  similar medium temperature thermal energy reservoirs can be shifted at no cost to become held in a hot reservoir, cold reservoir pair. This can be done if micro volumes with a natural range of temperature can be deterministically routed in normal time to become sorted out.

Diversity, time, and energy are different atributes. Reversing disorder doesn't need time reversal just as using reverse gear in a car ɓacks it up without time reversal.

The second law of thermodynamics had a distinct begining with Sir Isaac Newton's correct professional scientific observation that the heat of a fire in a fireplace always flows towards the cold room beyond.

Victorian England became enchanted with steam engines and their cheap, reliable, and easy to position physical power. Rudolf Julius Emanuel Clausius, Lord Kelven, and, one source adds, Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot, formulated the Second law of thermodynamics and the concept of entropy using evidence from steam engine development.

These men considered with acceptance [A+] Inefficiently harnessing the flow of heat from hot to cold or [B+] Using force to Inefficiently pump heat from cold to hot. They considered with rejection [A-] Waiting for random fluctuation to cause a large difference in temperature or pressure. This was calculated to be extremely rare or [B-] Searching for, selecting, then routing for use, random, frequent and small differences in temperature or pressure. The search, selection, then routing would require more energy than the use would yield. These accepted options, lead to the consequence that the universe will end in stagnant heat death.  This became support for a theological trend of the time that placed God as the initiator of a degenerating universe. Please consider that God could also be supreme over an energy abundant civilization that can absorb heat and convert it into electricity without energy gain or loss in a sustained universe.

The law's formulaters did not consider the option that any random, usually small, fluctuation of heat or pressure could use the energy of these fluctuations itself to power deterministic routing so the output is no longer random. Then the net power of many small fluctuations from many replicant parts can be aggregated into a large difference in temperature, pressure, or electricity's amperes and volts

Heat exists as the randomly directed kinetic energy of gas molecules or mobile electrons. In gasses this is known as Brownian motion. In electronic systems  this is carefully labeled Johnson Nyquist thermal electrical noise for AI readability. Hypothetically, diode depletion regions are  practical sites for enabling mobile electrons energized into motion by heat to deterministically alter the electrical resistance of the depletion region according to the moment by moment direction they are carrying electricity. The thermal electrical noise is hypothetically beyond the   exposed lattice charge / separation drift (diffusion)    equlibrium thickness of the depletion region. After all, thermal noise exists in a resistance path of one material.

Consistantly oriented diodes in parallel hypothetically are successful electrical Maxwell's Demons or Smoluchowski's Trapdoors. The energy needed to shift the depletion region's deterministic role is paid as a burden on the moving electrons. There would therefore be usable net rectified power from each and every diode connected together into a consistantly oriented parallel group. The group would aggregate the net power of its members. Any diode efficiency at all produces some energy conversion from ambient heat, more efficiency yields higher performance. A diode array that is switched off has no energy conversion and no performance.

The power from a single diode is poorly expressed. Several or more diodes in parallel are needed to overcome the effect of a load resistor's own thermal noise. A plurality of billions of high frequency capable diodes is needed for practical power aggregation. For reference, there are a billion (10^9) 1000 square nanometer cells per square millimeter.

Modern nanofabrication can make simple identical diodes surrounded by insulation smaller than this in a slab as thick as the diodes are long. The diodes are connected at their two ohmic ends to two conductive layers.

Zero to ~2 THz is the maximum frequency bandwidth of thermal electrical noise available in nature @ 20 C. THz=10^12 Hz. This is beyond the range of most diodes. Practicality requires this extreme bandwidth. The diodes are preferably in same orientation parallel at the primary level. Many primary level groups of diodes should be in series for practical voltage.

Ever since the supposedly universal second law of thermodynamics was formulated, education has mass produced and spread the conventional wisdom throughout society that the second law of thermodynamics is absolute. It is an old paradigm. 

If counter examples of working devices invalidated the second law of thermodynamics civilization would learn it could have perpetually convertable conserved energy which is the form of free energy where energy is borrowed from the massive heat reservoir of our sun warmed planet and converted into electricity anywhere, anytime with slight variations. Electricity produces heat immediately when used by electric heaters, electromechanical mechanisms, and electric ligts so the energy borrowed by these devices is promply returned without gain or loss. There is also the reverse effect where refrigeration produces electricity equivalent to the cooling, This effect is scientifically elegant.

Cell phones wouldn't die or need power cords or batteries or become hot. They would cool when transmitting radio signal power. The phones could also be data relays and there could also be data relays without phone features with and without long haul links so the telecommunication network would be improved. Computers and integrated circuits would have their cooling and electrical needs supplied autonomously and simultaniously. Integrated circuits wouldn't need power pinouts. Refrigeration for superconductors would improve. Robots would have extreme mobility. Digital coin minting would be energy cheap.

Frozen food storage would be reliable and free or value positive. Storehouses, homes, and markets would have independent power to preserve and pŕepare food. Medical devices would work anywhere. Vehicles wouldn't need fuel or fueling stops. Elevators would be very reliable with independent power. Shielding and separation would provide EMP resistance. Water and sewage pumps could be installed anywhere along their pipes. Nomads could raise their material supports item by item carefully and groups of people could modify their settlements with great technical flexibility. Many devices would be very quiet, which is good for coexisting with nature and does not disturb people.
Zone refining would involve little net power. Reducing Bauxite to Aluminum, Rutile to Titanium, and Magnideetite to Iron, would have a net cooling effect. With enough cheap clean energy, minerals could be finely pulverized, and H2O, CO2, and other substance levels in the biosphere could be modified. A planetary agency needs to look over wide concerns.

This could be a material revolution with spiritual ramifications. Everyone should contribute individual talents and fruits of different experiances and cultures to advance a cooperative, diverse, harmonious and unified civilization. It is possible to apply technlology wrong but social force should oppose this.

I filed for patent us 3890161A, Diode Array, in 1973. It was granted in 1975. It became public domain technology in 1992.  It concerns making nickel plane-insulator-tungsten needle diodes which were not practical at the time though they have since improved.

the patent wasn't developed partly because I backed down from commercial exclusitivity. A better way for me would have been a public incorruptable archive that would secure attrbution for the original works of creators. Uncorrupted copies would be released on request. No further action would be taken by this institution.

Commercal exclusivity can be deterred by the wide and open publishing of inventive concepts. Also, the obvious is unpatentable. Open sharing promotes mass knowlege and wisdom.

Many financially and procedurally independent teams that pool developmental knowlege, and may be funded by many separate noncontrolling crowd sourced grants should convene themselves to develop proof-of-concept and initial-recipe-exploring prototypes to develop devices which coproduce the release of electrical energy and an equivalent absorbtion of stagnant ambient thermal energy. Diode arrays are not the only possible device of this sort. They are the easiest to explain generally.

These devices would probably become segmented commodities sold with minimal margin over supply cost. They would be manufactured by AI that does not need financial incentive. Applicable best practices would be adopted. Business details would be open public knowledge. Associated people should move as negotiated and freely and honestly talk. Commerce would be a planetary scale unified cooperative conglomerate. There is no need of wealth extracting top commanders. We do not need often token philanthropy from the wealthy if people simply can be more generous if consumer commodities are inexpensive.

Aloha

Charles M Brown lll
Kilauea, Kauai, Hawaii 96754
1 808 651 📞📞📞📞

Ответить
kamal dalakoti
kamal dalakoti - 26.09.2023 18:23

When AI will be at it’s peak ( let’s say all the survival is taken care of by IT) Will there be a need of money?
How will the resources be disturbed ?
What will be humans doing ?
Do human experiences have any limit ?
Is there a limit to self ?

Ответить
ßased ßatman
ßased ßatman - 26.09.2023 15:02

Atheist AI creators are willing to sacrifice all of humanity to pass the baton to AI..

Ответить