Комментарии:
Ecars and emachines use electricity and energy produced and use mainly using fossil fuel
It's... when all humans got all electric machines we will all be dead from climate change producing these emachines 😂😂😂😂
That smart phone has the most Inefficient charger ... wireless charging 😂😂
Ответить"sustainable"
have you seen their mines tho? how "sustainable" they are? hehe
Lithium-ion battery production is an integral part of two major economies, in particular, ours (the U.S.) and Poland. In April '23, it was reported that Poland surpassed the U.S. to have the world’s second largest lithium-ion battery production capacity. 👍🏿
ОтветитьWe are the BOC
ОтветитьCan we make AI understand forgiveness? It may be a crystal blue persuation.
Ответитьdrink a shot every time she says "intra logistics"
ОтветитьThanks for posting
ОтветитьPeople don't really care about the environmental impact.
It's about saving money 💰.
I have the billion dollar material to make lithium batteries be recycled 80,000 times, I can make any lithium battery rechargeable for over 1 million years. Contact me, or be left in the dust
ОтветитьI’m not sure if Jungheinrich could take all or any credit for lithium powered forklifts within the Intralogistics logistics industry unless of course IF they are narcissistic
ОтветитьThis really sounds like a paid commercial somehow
Ответитьyour burning fossil fuel ( mostly coal) to produce electricity? and loseing some of it as its transfered from power plant to your car ect. your car has a emisson contral system, the power plant dos not. you have to dig up and ship lithium just like coal. this documentary is full of inaccuracies.
Ответитьpropane is even cheaper then the power bill. plus the batters are super sensitive to temp to hot or cold and the fork lift will just quit on you
Ответитьnot true filling the dissel tank is cheaper than the power bill from charging
Ответитьyour not cuting emissons your just moving it
Ответитьfunny to see these very smart Germain scientist, tho they cant talk English..
ОтветитьThe battery of the future and now going forward for EV and bigger battery storage and applications is lithium silicon battery 🔋
ОтветитьA major factor is Li-Ion battery susceptibility to temperature extremes. In cold enough temperatures Li-Ion batteries can lose around 40% charge.
ОтветитьIf only all people in this planet really cares and make our planet much better and regained again normal weather etc oil miners and any miners must stop there business just to make back our planet gettin better to live again cause the oil in this planet makes him as lubricants, coolant etc like a machine needs oil. As for me our planet are like our car, vehicles that always being check from oil, water, and air
ОтветитьSilicon Anode is the battery of the future, lithium ion batteries are now getting antiquated
ОтветитьCENTRALIZRD SOURCING AND RESOURCING DÜE ENVIRÖNMENTÄL RECÖRDS
ОтветитьLi is only beginning, like Pb was in batteries, but Li is heavy and we need another cathode and anode materials, maybe not LiC6 and LiFePO4 and LiPF6 + EC + DMC + VC, but only few 100-th nanometers Li metal anode and special cathode, so we can make 1000 km battery / 100 kg / 20000 cycles from 0 to 45 *C without DC resistance impact.
ОтветитьТак нудно, так тупо. Как жвачка какая-то и общего смысла на минуту бы хватило. Какая-то деградация мышления.
ОтветитьShow us the disaster of winning Lithium in china, chili....Another story
ОтветитьImagine how much of a nightmare it would be having a lithium ion fire in a warehouse yeah right I don't think so not my warehouse that's for damn sure.
ОтветитьAll eyes on africa. poor land will be raped if not yet:(
ОтветитьPlant Trees!!
August 12, 2022
The more trees who die, the less oxygen you will have, and the hotter the temperatures will be because there will not be leaf coverage to cover over the height of human habitation to reduce temperatures. You must remember that unlike trees, man-made objects, like metal boxes to cars to buildings, absorb solar energy and release it as heat into the air. It is not just the gases from combustion and the heat from hot motors (petroleum and HVAC motors), but ALSO the heat-radiating characteristic of man-made object surfaces that raise the temperature of the air. A great example of this are cars and trucks standing outside in the sunlight. How hot is the body surface? What about leaves and branches of a tree - are they hot to the touch?? Whatever solar energy man-made objects absorb, they will radiate it. That includes solar panels. THAT is what is happening right now. You will probably have to disassemble and destroy a lot of heat radiating technologies such as cars, trucks, buildings, AND the blacktop/sidewalk surfaces by deconstituting the elements and returning them to mine sites and reburying them, and put trees back in those places in order to bring temperatures down (and bring in rainfall).
It is getting to where trees are treated as ornaments of beauty instead of living beings who provide numerous critical functions while alive - cooling the air at human height by providing shade, providing oxygen, and making rainfall more likely to happen through transpiration of water vapor during photosynthesis. Trees brings rainfall activity, while deserts take it away because there is NOTHING to contribute to the formation of rain clouds, bringing rain. Also, the presence of moisture and trees will narrow down the range of temperature fluctuations that happen over a 24-hour period. Essentially, entire cities act as small deserts, since there is relatively little vegetation/tree coverage. Cities are even worse than deserts in this regard ALSO because of man-made objects' heat-radiating characteristic.
What can we do in the meantime? Can we grow trees to cover narrow roads and grow vines that grow leaves during spring to cover the roads overhead ahead of the summer months? Can we build vine structures over the majority of buildings for a similar reason? We have to have a way of bringing temperatures down by removing as many man-made objects from contact with the sun as possible in any way we can. It is ridiculous to see 120+ degree F temperatures. Kuwait is starting to become unliveable because of these temperatures. You'll see the Ethiopian Desert normally hit 122 degrees, and it has hit 140 degrees. Even worse is the Lut Desert in Iran, which see temperatures of nearly 160 degrees! American Meteorological Society claims a reading of about 177 degrees. There, electronics stop working very quickly, and you can only be out of the car for two minutes maximum. ACs in many cars quit working. Shoes melt.
Assuming that we have started to take apart the technologies such as cars, vehicles, etc. and started planting trees and covering up buildings and roads to shield them from the sun, how then would we deal with the nature of "green energy?" The fact is, if we carry out these actions, then solar energy could become unreliable for substantial power generation because the vegetation, including trees, would then bring on more periods of rain, which would in turn impact the number of days of availability of full sunshine. It remains to be seen what would be the impact on winds by such vegetation, even if the windmills are built with propellers far above the tree tops because of the potential for the moderation of the Earth's temperature across its surface relative to today's present scenario. We may have to examine what wind conditions were like thousands of years ago through descriptions of such in ancient writings in areas that were not yet deforested. I recognize that this might not resemble the scenario in which we regreen as much of today's deforested areas as possible. This may also have an unseen impact on wind energy as a reliable source of energy.
I believe the key is reducing the level of technology we have, which can reduce the impact of mining, drilling, and harvesting on the Earth, as well as remove sources of heat generation as described earlier.
In the end, just a battery into an forklift. New name is mobile forklift, tech babi
ОтветитьNa-ion bateries are newest and bettet, less harmfull on environment.
ОтветитьFossil Fuels wants hydrogen so they can control the fuel of the 21st and 22nd century. There are countless ways to generate electricity. Electricity puts the power in the people's hands.
ОтветитьThe way of the future is graphene/ graphite batteries.
ОтветитьGermans on batteries, You did better on pervit ... battery powered cars and the whole green agenda is a fraud of the elite, and you will not succeed
Ответитьvery good advertisement for JUNGHEİNRİCH. DW didnt make documentary, this is ad.........
ОтветитьSolid state is the future
ОтветитьGood upload ... !!
ОтветитьRealy I like this video so much
Ответитьsuper sir
ОтветитьThis is why israel wants iran ,for the lithium deposits
ОтветитьI use my alcatel mobile for 4 years almost.... bought for 80 euros as the returned google pixel didnt have switchable batteries... so I bought 2 pairs of extra batteries exteding the life for 6 to 8 years I hope...
ОтветитьShame we'll have no lithium anyway because of people tossing away those disposable vapes after use
ОтветитьStoring energy in hydrogen has an overall conversion efficiency of 25%....
ОтветитьJai Hinduja. Like India, Iran has discovered huge lithium deposits. The avarcarious West will be keen to control them to wean off their addiction to Putin and Middle Eastern oil.
ОтветитьLIB is the future, no doubt.
ОтветитьGood step 👍
ОтветитьHopefully the batteries would evolve away from Lithium to a safer material
ОтветитьMissed a lot by not mentionimg Congo and cobalt.
ОтветитьBatteries are NOT the future! Free energy straight from the vacuum like Tesla said over a hundred years ago is the future!
ОтветитьHughes products mosts reliablesd
ОтветитьThis documentary comes after lithium was found in (Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir India) weeks ago that's interesting
Ответить