Комментарии:
Loved it sir 🥰
ОтветитьThanks
ОтветитьGreat video, thank you.
Ответитьnice explanation.Thank you
Ответитьsuperb. thanks.
ОтветитьHELPFUL
Ответитьto link those .o (objects) files into an executable you can do : gcc -o executable_name obj1.o obj2.o ...
ОтветитьSuper explanation,this tutorial is easily understand to beginners
ОтветитьThis is possibly the best tutorial for a beginner to understand the GCC process. Other tutorials are too complex, but this one is easy to grasp. Do this tutorial first and then move on to others. We all have to learn to crawl before we can walk.
ОтветитьSaved my life
ОтветитьV nicely explained, can u do it for cmd in windows?
Ответитьthank you for explanation. I'm from Brazil
Ответитьnice buh please make the next more clear and visible thank u
ОтветитьHi,
Thanks for such an awesome explanation.
I have a query: As you mentioned after assembly stage, the code is now converted into machine level instructions corresponding to user written code. However some functions like 'printfl()' are still present in form of labels. These labels are resolved/linked in the last stage ie linking stage.
My question is: How does this happen? How does linker knows the path/address/definition of printf()? Is there a way I can see printf() definition on my system?
Good explanation
ОтветитьI understood you well. Thanks for this video. I have been struggling with IDE's now for about two months. I've used Geany, Code::Blocks, and my latest is Eclipse CDT. I spend more time troubleshooting and configuring my IDEs than I do fixing syntax errors in my code. Very frustrating. At least you have provided me a tool to break the process down and detect where my IDE is falling short.
Ответитьwell done my friend
ОтветитьVery nice explanation..Thanks
ОтветитьDoumo arigatou Howto-san!
ОтветитьThank you! That was a really nicely explained tutorial.
Ответитьexplained nicely but i am confused what are the sources of those codes i.e gcc -E frome where i can learn more about it means of which programing language command these are
ОтветитьIt's impossible to understand anything due to your horrible pronounciation.
Ответить