Комментарии:
Aren't the colors supposed to be flat? Since ECN-2 processing makes the image flat so that it can be adjusted in post. Like that's the whole purpose of motion picture film lol. I wonder how your images appeared cinematic and punchy right out of the camera.
ОтветитьI have vision 3 with remjet backing, Will it harm the chemistry?
ОтветитьI just bought some for sample shots. I will be sending the film to Germany from the US to develop and be scanned using a 14k scanner.
ОтветитьYou can develop it in c-41
(if you remove the remjet layer first.)
But most labs don't do that, so you'll have to develop it at home.
I got a 122m bulk roll of v3 500t for 120€ putting me at about 1,66€ per roll. (0.046€ per image)
ОтветитьONLY ten dollars. ONLY.
ОтветитьI see these dope colors but what’s the way to get those colors when scanning. Do you folks mainly use negative lab pro?
ОтветитьSomething’s poking me into thinking you’re having fun with Kodak Gold, but it’s not. I don’t know, it just could be me.
Ответить🕊️
ОтветитьOnly $10 a roll but twice as much to process
ОтветитьHow does real Vision3 compare to CineStill, which is supposedly just Vision3 without the remjet?
Ответитьso my issue with this is it looks like fujifilm, a cheaper very commercially available film. i don’t doubt is cinema-grade film but the tones remind of fuji too much to use it. i think the way vision works on 16mm is excellent but doesn’t necessarily transfer well to still.
ОтветитьThe colors were all over the place from shot to shot, they’re not consistent in these examples, and they don’t look cinematic at all.
ОтветитьWhere can I get this?!
ОтветитьThis is a stupid question but what iso do you shoot this at? I’m thinking about transferring the roll into a dummy can of film so I can shoot it in a point and shoot with adx code
ОтветитьOnly 10$ per roll. Fuck right off. A three pack of Kodak gold used to cost 7$ up until 3-4 years ago where I live
ОтветитьThese guys don't offer a android app
Ответить$30 bucks to develop this type plus $25 for c41 is crazy at indisposable 😂😂
ОтветитьBy the way, do you know a way to reverse engineer an ICC file into a logical profile description? Or mirror it, so it can be applied to a neutral image and thus tweak the image into the original that an ICC profile would normally "want" to make neutral?
ОтветитьWhat about the print film that it should be printed on, before it can be projected as a normal positive image? This negative film has the amber-orangy mask that should suppress noise, but the print film doesn't have that. It can be contact printed from the negative, if 1:1, so without optical losses, and then you have a positive image that may be more easily converted to digital.
As the print film is negative too, you might try that instead of this vision3 film spooled into your stills camera too - for fun, to see what the effect is.
This is such secret everyone is shooting is 😅 it’s 6€ handrolled forma bigger can
ОтветитьThat's pretty much all I shoot now. the way I buy it, it basically cost me 5 dollars a roll.
ОтветитьHow much is the development for ecn2!
Ответитьif you use kodak vision on a normal film camera or repackaged it into a canister. feel free to unalive yourself
ОтветитьYou shall be hearing from me soon
ОтветитьCreate the problem and sell the solution. 👏🏼💵
ОтветитьIn Indonesia, currently KV3 stocks basically are the backbone of the community lol. The price to performance ratio is just out of this world, even beating Portra if developed and scanned correctly. The latitude is also pretty insane
ОтветитьWhere I'm from, in Malaysia, we have a lab called Darkroom8 and they do ecn-2 processing and it is really cheap which is MYR 20 per roll processing and one roll costs around 23-30 MYR. Its actually cheaper than regular C41 films
ОтветитьBest kept secret…. For you.
ОтветитьGood luck finding a lab near you that does ECN-2 developing 🤦🏼♂️
ОтветитьMake the Tri-X, Panasonic X, Verichrome B/W, Kodachrome!
ОтветитьWhere I’m at and the membership my local film store provides
I can get Kodak vision 3 film at $11 (CAD) per roll
I highly recommend this film stock over anything atm as even now, what was considered budget film stocks are now pricey ie; Kodak Gold, Ultramax, and Color plus. Don’t get me started on portra. I cry looking at those prices.
Vision3 yields better results than Cinestill imo, but that all boils down to how you set the exposure of the film.
You could also buy a whole "can" and spool it yourself. Way cheaper than 10/roll in the long run
ОтветитьECN-2 is a big pain for home developing. It looks great but you basically have to lab it and it's already expensive.
500T is what the majority of Teminator 2 was shot on and is by far my favorite
What film camera is that? Do you have a recommendation?
ОтветитьWhat camera are you using here?
ОтветитьNeed to try this ❤
ОтветитьI saw a camera with 650 film
ОтветитьOnly costs $10 a roll. Only. Lol. How many exposures? Doesn’t look that different to Kodak.
Ответитьgod I really want a film camera
ОтветитьLove that song
ОтветитьRight on! Definitely going to get a roll
ОтветитьI used 500d With this roll and it for some reason had light leaks on some photos and other it didnt
ОтветитьShhhhh
ОтветитьNice Pentax
ОтветитьWell, $10 a roll is expensive!
ОтветитьWhat IE you shoot this film?
Ответить