Best Kept Secret in Film Photography

Best Kept Secret in Film Photography

indisposable

1 год назад

158,581 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

sonny Monsoon
sonny Monsoon - 08.09.2023 03:27

Aren't the colors supposed to be flat? Since ECN-2 processing makes the image flat so that it can be adjusted in post. Like that's the whole purpose of motion picture film lol. I wonder how your images appeared cinematic and punchy right out of the camera.

Ответить
Tasos T
Tasos T - 27.08.2023 08:43

I have vision 3 with remjet backing, Will it harm the chemistry?

Ответить
David Lide
David Lide - 26.08.2023 20:16

I just bought some for sample shots. I will be sending the film to Germany from the US to develop and be scanned using a 14k scanner.

Ответить
Niklas Claro
Niklas Claro - 20.08.2023 20:37

You can develop it in c-41
(if you remove the remjet layer first.)
But most labs don't do that, so you'll have to develop it at home.

Ответить
Niklas Claro
Niklas Claro - 20.08.2023 20:34

I got a 122m bulk roll of v3 500t for 120€ putting me at about 1,66€ per roll. (0.046€ per image)

Ответить
Marqués de Gruñón
Marqués de Gruñón - 19.08.2023 01:41

ONLY ten dollars. ONLY.

Ответить
Sneaking Elephant
Sneaking Elephant - 18.08.2023 19:06

I see these dope colors but what’s the way to get those colors when scanning. Do you folks mainly use negative lab pro?

Ответить
JOISCARA
JOISCARA - 15.08.2023 13:11

Something’s poking me into thinking you’re having fun with Kodak Gold, but it’s not. I don’t know, it just could be me.

Ответить
jvt.abstract
jvt.abstract - 07.08.2023 07:52

🕊️

Ответить
dflf
dflf - 21.07.2023 07:51

Only $10 a roll but twice as much to process

Ответить
Regis Lemonade
Regis Lemonade - 18.07.2023 01:20

How does real Vision3 compare to CineStill, which is supposedly just Vision3 without the remjet?

Ответить
nouveau
nouveau - 08.07.2023 23:17

so my issue with this is it looks like fujifilm, a cheaper very commercially available film. i don’t doubt is cinema-grade film but the tones remind of fuji too much to use it. i think the way vision works on 16mm is excellent but doesn’t necessarily transfer well to still.

Ответить
Casual
Casual - 28.06.2023 16:40

The colors were all over the place from shot to shot, they’re not consistent in these examples, and they don’t look cinematic at all.

Ответить
Alyse Butterfield
Alyse Butterfield - 22.06.2023 19:43

Where can I get this?!

Ответить
sam
sam - 21.06.2023 06:51

This is a stupid question but what iso do you shoot this at? I’m thinking about transferring the roll into a dummy can of film so I can shoot it in a point and shoot with adx code

Ответить
tolga1cool
tolga1cool - 17.06.2023 20:07

Only 10$ per roll. Fuck right off. A three pack of Kodak gold used to cost 7$ up until 3-4 years ago where I live

Ответить
Emeraldeyes92
Emeraldeyes92 - 13.06.2023 20:22

These guys don't offer a android app

Ответить
Leo G
Leo G - 29.05.2023 10:28

$30 bucks to develop this type plus $25 for c41 is crazy at indisposable 😂😂

Ответить
JP dJ
JP dJ - 21.05.2023 11:46

By the way, do you know a way to reverse engineer an ICC file into a logical profile description? Or mirror it, so it can be applied to a neutral image and thus tweak the image into the original that an ICC profile would normally "want" to make neutral?

Ответить
JP dJ
JP dJ - 21.05.2023 11:44

What about the print film that it should be printed on, before it can be projected as a normal positive image? This negative film has the amber-orangy mask that should suppress noise, but the print film doesn't have that. It can be contact printed from the negative, if 1:1, so without optical losses, and then you have a positive image that may be more easily converted to digital.
As the print film is negative too, you might try that instead of this vision3 film spooled into your stills camera too - for fun, to see what the effect is.

Ответить
Pavel Malý
Pavel Malý - 16.04.2023 02:20

This is such secret everyone is shooting is 😅 it’s 6€ handrolled forma bigger can

Ответить
spieler440
spieler440 - 09.04.2023 22:06

That's pretty much all I shoot now. the way I buy it, it basically cost me 5 dollars a roll.

Ответить
David Shi
David Shi - 07.04.2023 05:39

How much is the development for ecn2!

Ответить
Akhyar Rayhka
Akhyar Rayhka - 25.03.2023 13:23

if you use kodak vision on a normal film camera or repackaged it into a canister. feel free to unalive yourself

Ответить
THICCUMRABBIT
THICCUMRABBIT - 28.01.2023 00:56

You shall be hearing from me soon

Ответить
Alex Vozniuc
Alex Vozniuc - 18.01.2023 21:33

Create the problem and sell the solution. 👏🏼💵

Ответить
4chooo 改
4chooo 改 - 08.01.2023 16:01

In Indonesia, currently KV3 stocks basically are the backbone of the community lol. The price to performance ratio is just out of this world, even beating Portra if developed and scanned correctly. The latitude is also pretty insane

Ответить
sonyviva308
sonyviva308 - 07.01.2023 05:44

Where I'm from, in Malaysia, we have a lab called Darkroom8 and they do ecn-2 processing and it is really cheap which is MYR 20 per roll processing and one roll costs around 23-30 MYR. Its actually cheaper than regular C41 films

Ответить
michael macias
michael macias - 06.01.2023 11:22

Best kept secret…. For you.

Ответить
Bum Badabim Bap
Bum Badabim Bap - 05.01.2023 23:27

Good luck finding a lab near you that does ECN-2 developing 🤦🏼‍♂️

Ответить
Scipio Hispania
Scipio Hispania - 25.12.2022 19:32

Make the Tri-X, Panasonic X, Verichrome B/W, Kodachrome!

Ответить
Sacred Provenance
Sacred Provenance - 20.12.2022 13:53

Where I’m at and the membership my local film store provides
I can get Kodak vision 3 film at $11 (CAD) per roll
I highly recommend this film stock over anything atm as even now, what was considered budget film stocks are now pricey ie; Kodak Gold, Ultramax, and Color plus. Don’t get me started on portra. I cry looking at those prices.

Vision3 yields better results than Cinestill imo, but that all boils down to how you set the exposure of the film.

Ответить
David Brown
David Brown - 30.11.2022 08:07

You could also buy a whole "can" and spool it yourself. Way cheaper than 10/roll in the long run

Ответить
David Brown
David Brown - 30.11.2022 08:06

ECN-2 is a big pain for home developing. It looks great but you basically have to lab it and it's already expensive.
500T is what the majority of Teminator 2 was shot on and is by far my favorite

Ответить
Terry Noel
Terry Noel - 25.11.2022 18:41

What film camera is that? Do you have a recommendation?

Ответить
Your Bro Ellio
Your Bro Ellio - 25.11.2022 04:21

What camera are you using here?

Ответить
Anthony Firmin
Anthony Firmin - 16.11.2022 01:43

Need to try this ❤

Ответить
Captainzilla418
Captainzilla418 - 14.11.2022 18:53

I saw a camera with 650 film

Ответить
global.001
global.001 - 10.11.2022 18:37

Only costs $10 a roll. Only. Lol. How many exposures? Doesn’t look that different to Kodak.

Ответить
pew pew
pew pew - 24.10.2022 08:44

god I really want a film camera

Ответить
dan flick
dan flick - 21.10.2022 04:20

Love that song

Ответить
Dylan Truesdale
Dylan Truesdale - 20.10.2022 05:31

Right on! Definitely going to get a roll

Ответить
Just A Pair of Legs
Just A Pair of Legs - 14.10.2022 23:33

I used 500d With this roll and it for some reason had light leaks on some photos and other it didnt

Ответить
Gabe Kanae
Gabe Kanae - 29.09.2022 12:14

Shhhhh

Ответить
Modern Vintage
Modern Vintage - 21.09.2022 19:49

Nice Pentax

Ответить
Klaus Moritz Peitzsch
Klaus Moritz Peitzsch - 10.09.2022 22:34

Well, $10 a roll is expensive!

Ответить
Poco M4probelly
Poco M4probelly - 08.09.2022 05:20

What IE you shoot this film?

Ответить