Комментарии:
Well done, I felt her presentation. But this motion is not centered on the benefits and features of social media platforms.
The focal point is social media corrupts or does not corrupts human interaction.
Then I asked what's human interaction in this context?
It's basically seeking to address how we rely more on these platforms for seeking help or solving problems instead of one on one engagement with experts and experienced persons.
Moreover, how social media has overpowered the other forms of communication, like normal phone calls, face-to-face discussion etc.
That intimate relationship is dying out, The respect and tolerance for each other views on these platforms is becoming something else.
The misuses and peddling information falsely is another factor talking about human interaction or engagement
Let me guess, all your stocks is in media. Biased
ОтветитьShe did actually argue that most of dating people meet up through social media in the U.S. Wow, great argument. I would have loved to ask her, if she has an idea how many people break up in the U.S. or divorce since that statistic came out. I think it spiked quite a lot as well, and that would surely be because of social media.
She would recommend moderation. Well I am sorry, but moderation is quite impossible, just as is impossible to enforce the law entirely to all subjects with full effectivity.
I am just curious . The young judge gave a piece of paper to the speaker . What does it mean? Does he give him or her remind letter to stop ?
Is there anyone who can answer?
The most adamant defendor of social media yet the most anxious speaker yet.
ОтветитьNotice how she calls common people "the public"
ОтветитьIs my attention span that short? 😭😭😭 when she sips the water suddenly I’m out of it and can’t listen, also her speech really sounded like a student googling a presentation for an assignment just to not fail her class. Maybe this argument would look better on paper or a book, but I couldn’t really listen to it in action
ОтветитьIf she did really insta, snap and chat that her whole argument would have been over.
Her taking a sip of water after that statement disconnected her from the audience. It was all done for me
Social Media, in its entirety, is a magnifying-glass platform, which can also be used for trade. 👼🏽💯
ОтветитьThat's easy for this stupid bitch to say. I'll be ready to laugh when social media destroys her life lmao fuck you.
ОтветитьThank you Oxford union for conducting this amazing debate 😍🙏
ОтветитьLets have a debate on this on a live call. i need at least 6 sign ups.
ОтветитьThey do corrupt interactions, because all platforms do shadowbanning and censorship
ОтветитьIt is mind blowing ancient images ever captured in histody of space. Cluster of hundred of galaxies of early universe.
We are in age of new astronomy. It opened new window to our universe. It is just beginnin.
Thanks JWST and thanks for NASA, ESA and CSA.
social media give voice to the voiceless; it makes our from customer become producer.
ОтветитьBus resh out side stand people
ОтветитьCan't corrupt what is already corrupt. People like this are the worst, fake intellectuals, sophists.
ОтветитьSmall gowda language samjna no
ОтветитьAbout classical dance performence
ОтветитьJack symends go toe to toe she is great
ОтветитьBhi girgya no it my come my back come no
ОтветитьMy sex goit who are talk no you sex goit who are my talk 2 who are talk no family goit allow what talk ok
ОтветитьMy you husband wife relationship
ОтветитьWere supposed to trust a Tinder employee to give us an honest and unbiased view of the dangers of social media?....sure.
ОтветитьSocial media itself expands consciousness, but the way it’s used is what makes it inherently toxic. Maybe prior to using social media, we should be educated to the positive impacts it could have in the aforementioned points mentioned in the debate as a means to overcome the negative ones?
ОтветитьSocial media is a universal megaphone. It's neither good nor bad, but will amplify everything present in society.
Its tools, however, are lacking in order to allow for civilized debate. Twitter, for instance, lacks structure and rules for that. It's just an open mic.
She is a droid made at Oxford.
They have programed her, and put her on the Snowflake Setting.
🇮🇳
ОтветитьThis is me in every university event ! Panicked af !
ОтветитьI think she is the most one i agree with,To be honest
Ответитьcan I just ask (off topic here) what's the dress code? Why are some of these women dressed like they're going to a prom? Just curious. The men seem to have a handle on dress code. Just asking, not trying to sound rude just curious if this is the norm.
ОтветитьWatched all 6 videos still didn't knew who Won🤦♂️ ! Tell us the vote count in the last videos .
ОтветитьShe’s an angel
ОтветитьRemember the nuclear bomb, the biological weapons, the guns themselves, they were all innovation.
Innovation isn´t a god, therefore it isn´t perfect, and the way she´s defending that innovation can only be good is very dangerous and opens ways to new kinds of evil and corruption to enter humans lifes and minds.
I´m not against social media in any means, but I´m sure based on knowledge and by living certain situations that social media and even the internet is holding us back in some areas.
I finish by saying that we humans are limited, therefore being in touch with something limitless or perceived has limitless is no good for us, becomes to much.
Um, did a guy secretly sneak in a camera to a secret all white high society?? lmao. I mean, ...
ОтветитьHer eyes are amazing!
ОтветитьHer argument of "us being afraid of technological evolution" was absolutely irrelevant to the focus of the debate "Social media does not corrupt Human interactions".......It seems that people are more focused on the positives and negatives of social media, than they are on outlining and categorizing human interaction. Just because this speaker can't live without social media, doesn't mean it is good.......It surprises me that she is a doctor......
ОтветитьDr Jess, how many times do you spend on SNS? What's worth it? You got nothing but just an online digital piece of transistors. SNS absorbs human's time and resources, leads to the TOTAL WASTE. Only commercial use of SNS worth it, like somebody advertise some products on SNS for example.
ОтветитьDr. Carbino made some very compelling arguments. Especially love how she pointed out how some people are always against technological advancement.
ОтветитьPlease put your hands down. It looks as if you are trying, and failing, to interpret for the hard of hearing.
ОтветитьSocial media did expand rather than constrict social interaction
ОтветитьThis was a very good argument that actually addressed the core topic: corruption and the nature of human interactions. I'd like to see her and Jack Symonds go toe-to-toe, she was great.
ОтветитьSocial media without some ethic regulation does destroy human .
ОтветитьI thought she was well-prepared and reasonably articulate. I can't agree with her view, but having lived in a superficial Los Angeles, I think she did very well considering where she came from. Thank you for debating a consequential topic.
Ответитьsocial Media could.
Ответитьsocial Media could.
ОтветитьShe sounds like her voice is computer-generated.
Ответить