Scientific Evidences for Creation | Dr. Frank Sherwin D.Sc. (Hon)

moonaticks xD love this guy.

Thanks

Since the earth’s magnetic field is decreasing, is it possible that in the past mutations were fewer due to the higher protective ability?

Praise Yahweh forever

I hope u will have chapters of ICR here in the philippines

Good video. Especially for beginners and laymen. Understandable, educational, to the point.

Let's share these far and wide.

Trillions upon trillions of organizational connecting points in living things. A few billion years of evolution, even if possible, which it is not, could never be even slightly enough time to perfectly organize the myriads of physical components, with their trillions upon trillions of organizational connecting points.

Thank you ICR

Mi aprezas ĉi tiun edukan enhavon. per ĉi tio mi povas plibonigi mian anusan murmuran sperton laŭ la plena mezuro de tio, kia dio intencis ĝin.

Awesome presentation!

There's no such thing as "evidences", O Christians! Stop wrecking our language!! 😠😠😠

Oxford Dictionary of English

evidence /ˈɛvɪd(ə)ns /
▸ noun [mass noun] the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid: the study finds little evidence of overt discrimination. ▪ Law information drawn from personal testimony, a document, or a material object, used to establish facts in a legal investigation or admissible as testimony in a law court: without evidence, they can't bring a charge.

▪ signs or indications of something: there was no obvious evidence of a break-in.

▸ verb [with object] be or show evidence of: the quality of the bracelet, as evidenced by the workmanship, is exceptional.

– PHRASES call someone in evidence Law
summon someone as a witness. give evidence Law
give information and answer questions formally and in person in a law court or at an inquiry: the person concerned may refuse to give evidence. in evidence
noticeable; conspicuous: his dramatic flair is still very much in evidence. turn King's evidence (also turn Queen's evidence) Law, British
(of a criminal) give information in court against one's partners in order to receive a less severe punishment: in exchange for not being prosecuted he agreed to turn Queen's evidence. turn state's evidence Law, US
(of a criminal) give information in court against one's partners in order to receive a less severe punishment.
– ORIGIN Middle English: via Old French from Latin evidentia, from evident- ‘obvious to the eye or mind’ (see evident).

Where is the evidence?

ICR loves science,,,...😮 on the authority of bible....and now science is based on faith....amazing

----- and the universe is 6000 yesrs old....after human started farming....ICR is a fraud

The scientific proof of "creation" is the Double Slit Experiment, and what it proves is that Creation is NOW, in real time. The wave never collapses. We perceive the wave to be in a location, and that becomes a timeline. The randomness is fixed at that point... meaning NOW.

You are arguing from the point of "too many coincidental implausible events and circumstances can only mean there must be a creator that made all this"
Well, there are trillions of galaxies in the observable universe each with trillions of starts and each star with several planets each. The rules of physics are simple. It is only by the astronomically huge numbers of particles interacting with each other that creates infinitely huge number of possibilities to exist that such planet as Earth could almost be a certainty.

Think of the simple model "Life" program with only 3 rules that determines if a cell (or pixel) is alive or dead. From this simple rules comes a myriad of possibilities and complex behavior. Our universe have different particles that acts way more complicated than the Life program. And the universe is a lot more massive, expansive than the Life program. Even without an intelligent designer, it is not hard to imagine that Life could spontaneously begin.

The important word is imagine. Not science. Abiogenesis is unrepeatable by science so far. Chemistry pretty much negates it happening. The act of creation is written down history backed by God incarnate.

Why is it that god would create the bombardier beetle's defense mechanism like that, or really the defense or offense of any creature, before the Fall necessitated the use of said defenses? Like, why did he make bees and scorpions sting and put serrated teeth in sharks' mouths before the Fall?

A REVIEW: REALIZING REALITIES...

REVIVALS...RIOTS...
RAPTURE[MAYBE, SEPTEMBER]...RUINS...
REIGN OF ANTICHRIST...
REIGN OF CHRIST...
RIGHTING OF WRONGS...
REJOICE: NEW HEAVEN & EARTH !!

AMEN--PURPOSE OF LIFE: LIVE BY FAITH......

Delusional creationist. Pathetic really. The bible is a book of fairytales and myths. Disgusting that you are allowed to preach lies and misinformation.

Why are you deliberately lying to Christians? why would you do it? You are obviously not a Christian or you would be worried for your immortal soul.

It would be helpful if you stopped trying to debunk science and get on with proving your claims.

Planets are mentioned in the origin account?

An entertaining and easy-to-understand story for young adults to inspire faith in support of Genesis creation and the evolution debate is in the book Axis of Beginning. A quote from the book Axis of Beginning: “To say that God needed millions or billions of years acknowledges a form of evolution and deception. God warns about adding or taking away from His Word. And adding even one more hour to six days of creation leads to a form of evolution and deception. IS IT WRITTEN: “In the beginning, God.” However . . . ?”

Technically, ticks are arachnids so if they were found on the moon they should be called lunarachnids 😅

Great video! Time to replace the mythology of natural selection with the truth of divine selection.

Science is the study of the physical and the natural.
Creationism is the study of the metaphysical and the supernatural.

So, evidence for the physical and the natural supported by the metaphysical and the supernatural, or put another way, retrospective evidentialism.
The spiritual permit to apply omnipotence to everything and anything through abundant faith..alone.

😂luna-ticks

**I am, you are, everything is the only evidence of creation.**

Lunatics would be arachnids, not insects😊

Thank you!

So enjoy Dr. Sherwin's presentations.

Great 👍 job Frank! Please produce more videos of the impossibilities of evolution. My grandkids need it! Amen
Amazing denial of the evidence.

If you are gonna have a Q&A or Comments, MIC the Questioners or Commenters.... LOVE the video!!

Herbert Spencer, a 19th century English philosopher, sociologist, and biologist had 5 systems of natural phenomena: time, force, space, matter, and motion.

Genesis 1:1; in the beginning(time), God(force), created(motion), the heavens(space), and the earth(matter).

You’re one verse in the Bible and all of that is layed out😂

**this is an exercize in futility, just look around everything you see is evidence including yourself, any doubt?**

I'd like to share evidence that has been overlooked in my video 'Begining of understanding '
Consistent with science and Scripture

It would be nice if you would repeat the question or give the microphone to the audience member.

The earth is not 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
Sunrise to sunset
Sunset to next sunset
Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).