Комментарии:
Cannot believe the lady with the huge mic is the Product Marketing Manager for Twinmotion, she needs to be fired. Even I could do a better job than her.
ОтветитьCan Twinmotion make a feature of exe. file for VR?
ОтветитьI must agree with you,my first time use of twin motion was very pleasant its user friendly and simple for beginners.Great job!
ОтветитьWe need a way to pin things down in 3D space in the world outliner.
ОтветитьWhy no Camera? The navigation tools are so clunky
ОтветитьI want dlss options in Twinmotion settings
ОтветитьNO livesync with twinmotion datasmith:(
Ответитьi used both fort a long time, and got a clients like Hariri and Pontarini asking for me, Lumion is better overall , no but. But then the question is D5 or Lumion? .. Also UE5 is a king, without debate
Ответитьwhat about path tracer for mac?!
ОтветитьHope to see twinmotion tutorial videos in your content
ОтветитьAnother thing is how we continue animating in sequence, I can't find what number I stop or to beging in sequence animation
ОтветитьEu gostaria de saber se o path tracer poderá ser usado no Mac? É uma pena que só funcione no windows
ОтветитьAmei essa entrevista!!
ОтветитьVery much liked this video, thanks.
ОтветитьVery Helpful
ОтветитьI love this channel and Twinmotion, but my God, these ladies were so boring. Stopped watching at 10 minutes.
ОтветитьCool gravity 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
ОтветитьIt could be nice to get sponsored objects like cars etc that can be used to fund Twinmotion giving us integrated real-life objects and quicker development due to increased funding.
ОтветитьPhoto-match Photo-match Photo-match
Please
Why Twinmotion over Lumion? Would you really like the cost of visualising software to be ANOTHER limiting factor when it comes to design? The more your overheads cost, the less time you will have for design.
ОтветитьD5
ОтветитьEnscape is beter then this 2 renderers!
Ответитьtwinmotion feels like playing mostwanted 2005.
ОтветитьThank you for such an insightful content, great! My take, both tools are awesome, couldn't agree more with their comments. I'm currently working on TM now integrating it to my work flow from 3DS max. Thank you again!
ОтветитьIt's just awesome
ОтветитьWhy not Thea Render?
ОтветитьD5 Render is really good, both twinmotion and D5 are good, D5 right now have some features which tw doesn't have. Really looking forward you have video about D5 render.
ОтветитьD5 Render is still leading if you have RTX cards
ОтветитьIs Unreal Engine going to become the monopoly of all visualization tools as AR/VR becomes standard?
Ответить69 replies...
ОтветитьA very insightful interview! Nice work, and great to see some valuable discourse that highlights the importance of using the right tool for the job.
ОтветитьPhoto Matching would be a nice feature
ОтветитьTM’s UI is incredible but why oh why is it not possible to add assets back into revit like enscape?? Please tell me I’m wrong
ОтветитьLove banana bread 😁
Ответить❤️❤️❤️
ОтветитьTwinmotion is cost effective and qualitative, time to scrap lumion
ОтветитьLove u
Ответитьrender elements, in my opinion, should not even be a priority to epicgames. There is a LOT to work on in twinmotion, and I wish Epic would focus on the render outputs. Would it not be better to NOT encroach in on another software's capabilities, it is rather like having an unfair competition....
ОтветитьJust take the time and learn unreal. It will be worth it in the long run.
ОтветитьIs it possible ? For twinmotion to use UE5 as engine.
Ответитьno render passes ! unusable for srs pro work
Ответить- render elements
- scattering with offset, negative and positive, from face edges (so you can scatter detail grass on edges only)
- water on path tracing
- decals on path tracing
- simple fur, like Lumion
- edge softening on texture, so we don't have to bevel the geometry
- dirt on edges
The "Marketing" lady sold Lumion first than the product she is supposed to sell. Also, nobody care if she studid Architecture in "Germany". The Tech. lady is the kind of professional anyone wants in their company. She sells the product way more efficiently.
Ответитьcomnts, even though they paid for their versions.
ОтветитьGreat content once again! My question, honestly, would’ve been “why TM and not Unreal 5?”. I really hope UE remains accessible as it is at the moment, regarding software licensing.
I imagine most designers and architects don’t have the time to tinker with a more complex, open platform, but it can be an incredibly valuable tool. Having watched Sam’s recent presentation on UE5 for Archviz, I trust the continued support for years to come.
Especially excited about the upcoming Datasmith improvements!
Valeu, Oliver 👍
Veo una contradicción con lo que dicen y hacen, hablan de qué modelan con ACAD (Archicad ) pero ponen la interfaz dé Revit, algo no encaja.🤔
Ответить❤️
-Render elements of course
-Dynamic snow affected by car and pedestrians paths
-dynamic water
-render videos with music and sounds
-dynamic windows.. Such as the already existing dynamic doors
-🥂
This was a valuable video!
ОтветитьI love Twinmotion! It's way good to use, but please.. bring Render Elements features next time! Thanks.
Ответить