Комментарии:
What was the point of separate countries when India is still full of millions of Muslims and why did Sikh leadership agree for half of our major Sikh pilgrimages to be desolated and look at the dire state of them in Pakistan now which is our greatest tragedy
ОтветитьIt’s a tragic loss to the Sikh empire due to their own downfall so no point moaning now and there should have been a separate state then and this guy is somewhat wrong stating Sikhism was under Hinduism umbrella when it’s due to Sikhism that Hinduism wasn’t extinct today and have now forgotten it all!
ОтветитьLand of Modern Canada IS Khalistan
ОтветитьAs a Hindu Punjabi, I really want to ask Khalistanis that what would you do to those 40% Hindus are living in Punjab that have been living there for centuries, if let’s assume Punjab becomes a country? Are you planning to take over their land? Are you planning to kill them off? Also, this video fails to address how India Punjab still has almost 40% Hindu Population
ОтветитьAlso there is an interesting character parallel maybe in “Sir Roger Rohaut”(England) and guru Ravidas maybe. If you consider a name change into the “noble” English side as happened quite often when generals or leaders of all kinds villa to retire.
They all hide at that point like witness protection on paper. The Janus thing was big with them and parallels are the norm. They sired England in my belief. Sire/shire they would trade places with far off other nobles when rebellions would occur etc.
I believe the Brahmins were such and every nation has its related version through time. No harm no foul but yeah that seems to be what I’ve come to in my thoughts. Like prima nocti but more like the sheriff and postman in a town ends up daddy in secret… lol but not joking. With love
Do you think Ukraine may represent a modern Sikh state attempt? Not sure In race or whatever but In the hill families etc? Great vid thank you
ОтветитьSoon we will Khalistan zindabad
ОтветитьAfter partion of punjab. There was no indian partitioned. India and pakista came into existence after 1000 independent nations got united togather. Punjab khalsaraj was biggest nation areas wise out of 1000 nations
Ответитьbig mistake by sikh not creating their own homeland
ОтветитьMany people refer to it as a partition of punjab not india
ОтветитьThere are several ethnic groups in India with their own language including Punjab which mostly has Sikhs. Why don’t all of those regions have their own state? You could apply the same logic to them too, right? This is a classic case of another outsider without adequate understanding of the real complexities of the situation coming in and telling us what to do.
ОтветитьHhv
Ответитьwhile sikhs were just 2% they gave a contribution of around 85% for the independence of india
ОтветитьSikh county in india coming soon
Ответитьsikh means penis in turkish 😂
ОтветитьBritishers should have put some negotiations on the table among sikhs at that time. Since Sikhs has overwhelmingly supported Britishers in WW1 &2 Just like jews. They could have offered us a big part of Punjab.
ОтветитьPrior to the British had its own state or country. The british let it be until that eventually conquered it after Maharaja Ranjit Singh.
Sikhs have alot of control in Punjab and live peacefully with it's Hindu and Muslim brothers aswell... Khalistan is for propaganda now, CIA pushes Pakistan to create more issues than needed.
Punjab needs it's basic necessities to survive and live, which are more than met.
Have fun with the propaganda machine.
I think Sindhi also doesn't have a country
ОтветитьIndia in it's politics and it's peoples. All indians are indians only some Hindu,s some, Muslims, some Sikh and christians. Religion and caste politics politician divide and rule policy they cannot unite India giving equal rights to all. No one hates India due to politicians and peoples hate each other's this cause saparations. Look at Pakistan they wanted country saparate they took it and again pushtun, Punjabi, Sindhi,s all others want saparate country. It is the peoples who always want their favour.
ОтветитьKhalistan Zindabaad
ОтветитьYou are way off the rail bro. Man where to even start, many points are not well researched through . Since , Guru Nanak Dev ji , the first Sikh Guru. Never saw themselves as sect of Hinduism . They have been a separate nation from get go.
ОтветитьSikhs & Muslims were not satisfied and both nations are not satisfied so far because this division wasn't made with justice⚖ and ignored intentionally so important things during this division, resultantly, Sikhs are fighting for Khalistan & Muslims are fighting for Kashmir, What ignored in this division? Majority of Sikhs & Muslims, British Government was supporting to the Hindus that time and wanted its interference in this region by this Un-justified division & succeeded, So Christian✝ interference is running in this region by this Un-justified division.This division is showing combination of two clever nations (01) Hindus (02) British🇬🇧 both are our enemies.
ОтветитьThe British betrayed the Sikh during the time of partition
ОтветитьSikh is a religion if Punjabis of India demand country it should be Punjabis of all faith
ОтветитьCanada has lot of free land .
Canada should give their land to ndp.
Sikhism is a sect (Panth) of Sanatan Dharma (Hinduism) and not a separate religion.
ОтветитьThe partition of India was not on the line of religion, there were some fanatic radicals Muslim political leader who want separate homeland for their own interest, even half of the Muslim population not supported that Idea at that time hence we see more Muslim population in India than Pakistan itself.
India is not Hindu country it's totally a secular country, more secular than so called western countries having just handful minorities.
Excellent explanation
ОтветитьThey will have soon.
Long Live Khalistan!
Soon..
ОтветитьSikhs are an integral part of India even before the British came in. They played a crucial role in the Independence and even today they make up a huge percentage of power throughout India. People should understand that when Gurunanak founded Sikhi to fight the oppressions against the Mughal Islamic rulers (these were the times of Bhakti Movement in the Hindu communities), the first people to join Sikhism were the people from the Hindu families. They treated it as a revolution within the Hindu communities in that region to join the Khalsa and fight against the Mughal rulers. Sikhs will always be a part of India, similar to other cultures and states.
Ответить11 th guru is Justin T
ОтветитьThere is no sikh country because there was no demand for it just like there is no hindu country. Pakistan is for muslims but india is for INDIANS, not hindu, not muslim, not sikh but INDIANS. there was no demand for hindu country or a sikh country.
ОтветитьTo really understand this topic, one has to first understand the origins of Sikhisim. First things first - all the Sikh Gurus were born to Hindu parents & it was customary for Hindu families in Punjab to raise their eldest son as a Sikh. During the Mughal era both communities were equally persecuted in Punjab & many Sikh Gurus there laid down their lives in support of their bretheren. Thus, Sikhisim was never really considered as different from Hinduisim, cousins at best. Till today, Hindus & Sikhs have shared families, culture & traditions. The British with their policy of 'divide & rule' pushed the valiant Sikhs to treat themselves as separate from the Hindus. While some Sikhs fell for this ruse, the majority did not. During the Partition of India Hindus & Sikhs fought the marauding Muslims together& were also not differentiated by during attacks by Muslims on their villages in the areas deemed for Pakistan. While a sizeable chunk of Punjab went to Pakistan, Punjabi Hindus & Sikhs from (west) Punjab fled that area and settled in Indian Punjab. The need for a separate Sikh homeland was never felt because both communities share a strong bond & enjoyed & continue to enjoy cordial relations. The topic of this video is thus a misnomer.
ОтветитьThen why hindu didn't get seperate country
Ответитьdont agree with many points. we sikh dont want a seperate country. India is our national and civilization.
ОтветитьThe main cause is baldev singh...that is main reason sikhs have no our country 😢
ОтветитьKhalistan will be carved out of Canada, insha allah.
ОтветитьIf every religion in India wants a separate country, there should have been atleast 10 countries in India.
Sikhs have whole India for themselves and they are highly respected here. Don't create division in our society with your useless videos.
Hindu promise sikhs in 1947 if they give their land to india and break punjab then we give u khalistan but after division clever hindu kkill sikhs and break sikh part of punjab into 3 pieces 1947 punjabis r 75% muslims gurdaspur qasoor division and many more areas r muslimz but sikh n hindu capture these areas forcefully hindu only use shiks and now they capture indian punjab
ОтветитьTime to invade Pakistan, afganistan, Bangladesh, Nepal , Bhutan , Srilanka and It's time for made Akhand Bharat 🚩🚩🚩🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🕉️🕉️🕉️🔱🔱🔱
ОтветитьSikhs brave comunity
ОтветитьWho are the sikhs in our Indian Knowledge -
Baba Nanak Ji🙏, Baba Banda Ji🙏, Maharaja Ranjit Singh, Sher Bhagat Singh, Sher Udham Singh, PM Manmohan Singh and many more....
Who are so called Sikhs persented to us-
Punnu, Nijjar, Bindarawala so on and so forth.
Make Khalistan in Canada.
The state that we know and Love is India.
For that you need to learn indian history since 9th Century, Sikhism started after 1755 CE, you need to understand all those events.
ОтветитьBecause there wasent sikh majority even in sikh empire there was only 9 percent sikh
ОтветитьOne opinion is that Master Tara Singh, the leader of Sikhs in 1940's was from Rawalpindi and due to communal violence between Muslims and Sikhs for decades in his hometown was against the creation of Pakistan. He was instrumental in leading the Sikhs towards joining India. Other Sikh leaders like Maharaja of Pakltiala state from East Punjab, were also inclined to joining India as many were in Congress. Master Tara Singh refused Jinnah's (the Muslim leader behind the creation of Pakistan) prposal to struggle jointly for Pakistan in which Sikhs could have negotiated some sort of their separate rule in Punjab. Had Tara Singh accepted Jinnah's offer, the bloodshed in partition of Punjab could have been avoided.
Ответитьthere will be someday, if sikhs can get india freedom so can for themselves.
ОтветитьActually hindus make a bluff with British saying that Sikhs are there branch. Sikhs like Jews Muslim and Christian beliefs in one God and believe he is not human or have no face.
Ответитьسکھوں کو ازادی دے دو اور کشمیر کو بھی ازادی دے دو اور امن سے رہو
ОтветитьThen why bengal isn’t a country? Once we euled bengal sultanate from dhaka
Ответить