Комментарии:
was that cgi of the soft crash into the ocean? The success of this flight was coms during burn up?
ОтветитьI think spacex need to look into the possibility of using the heat shield tiles on the launch mount to help it survive lauches
ОтветитьIn the plasma's pink glare, steel burning in air, gave proof through the flight, that the fin was still there.
ОтветитьOnce they get even one starship back, even if it is so badly damaged (and obsolete) that it will never fly again, they'll learn a lot about the engines and the spacecraft to seriously speed up innovation.
ОтветитьI wonder how those pressure waves will affect the cargo inside the rocket
ОтветитьI can use sub centimeter guidance on my RC airplanes with off the shelf products. I'm shure horizontal guidance isn't an issue for Space X. the issue is calibration and software and that just takes time and data.
ОтветитьAerodynamic modeling has come a long way. They don't necessary need to redesign the fins, or the hinges. They just need to redesign the airflow around them.
ОтветитьWhat a stupid comment Frazer, (why are they trying so FAST).
Because Elon wants to get humans off planet EARTH before the WEF Global white developed people all get anailated.
One would think that a good gust of wind would throw everything off as far as aligning with the chopsticks.
ОтветитьI'd like to know if the current starship's payload capacity is equal to the Shuttle's 30 tons. That is Elon Musk's deadliest secret.
ОтветитьE.T. did a fly by. Had to shut down them cameras.
ОтветитьWhy not launch a rocket half the size just for refueling..
ОтветитьOk so what exactly are you commentators saying?
The way you guys edited this video, it left me scratching my head.
Was Biden confused or not?
And what has that got to do with Trump?
How about you just showing the complete video without putting a spin on it. Sheesh!
So?
ОтветитьWhere did my comment go?
ОтветитьOK, I really need someone to explain to me this:
How can all of this be 'AMAZING' when SpaceX has literally failed in every project or contract they got, not achieving any of the milestones, being in a baby toddler state of the things?, Remember all of this was about going to the Moon and colonize Mars (in fudging 2024), and when the main project for a manned mission spacecraft has never achieved any success, when the cost of all of this equals the Apollo project, but Apollo project was able, in this scale and time of the project, to put several men in space and even orbit our satellite. SpaceX has not even capable of finishing ONE UNMANNED MISSION succesfuly.
Well, it was a rethoric question. The answer is that this is a scam, a trillionaire big scam.
Amazing they still doubt Elon , every ship has made great strides more then the last , and you think he years away from perfection , your nuts , he newest guy building these and 10 x farther then rest of competition , some people are meant to sit and watch and complain in life and others are go getters , with no such thing as can’t
ОтветитьHey, NASA! Do America a favor and cut all funds to anything Musk.
Ответитьwhat is the goal after LEO ?
ОтветитьDesign to 3 links frontal s prallelas. ❤Smoke _
ОтветитьThat reentry was like a Tom Cruise action movie. Amazing.
ОтветитьCan't be just build his hyperloop to Mars?
ОтветитьHey, Fraser - good to know that you and Justin Trudeau and Vladimir Putin are on the same page.
ОтветитьSo, we've gone from skate board to tricycle to bicycle. WAKE me when we have
WARP DRIVE !
The Dear Moon crowd cancelling is no big issue. Engineering is way harder than art.
ОтветитьThe plasma at 48 minutes looks like aspitting image of the Mutara Nebula from ST: Wrath of Khan
Ответитьyeah.. if one engine malfunctions (not catastrophically) out of 35, it's not nearly as important as it is if you only have 5...
Ответитьwhy does everyone cut the vid as soon as it starts to topple?
ОтветитьHow many engines and ships have been destroyed at this point? Weren't they supposed to have orbited the moon by now?
Ответитьthe rush, Mr. Slowsky, is that our species is still vulnerable to a planet scale disaster... once we are living self sufficiently on multiple bodies, we will be harder to exterminate.
Ответить"... they could lose a bunch" *
* For certain values of "a bunch".
Starship sank after landing?
ОтветитьThings hard to believe for a NASA fan. Welcome to the 21st.
ОтветитьI wonder if titanium hinges/flaps would be positive ?
ОтветитьHello little birdie
ОтветитьI'm wondering if an ablative composite structure would perform better than a hot staging ring.
Ответитьstill amazing ,,, this will never get old
Ответитьdid spaceX recovery the booster or starship? why isnt there anything about post splashdown?
ОтветитьNeat Star Ship test # 4 Loanch amazing stuff how uppper parts level Beechonn level any ecovery of Star Ship #29 study 📖 📓 strong and tuff space frame stainless can future if pasible beecon future eecovery idea set reflout ship fly 🇺🇸
ОтветитьThank you - learnt a lot.
ОтветитьStage ring needs its own recovery parachute another ton won’t make any difference to the overall stack.
ОтветитьHave you guys been given directive to ignore the fact that accumulating ufo’s in the footage was the reason?
ОтветитьMy 3 Best blue eyed commentaters Great job guys! Go SpaceX Go Elon Go Tesla.
Ответитьthe vapour cloud just before the landing burn is so sick
ОтветитьGreat video!
ОтветитьNearly 27000 kph down to the 300s kph BEFORE engine relight. Amazing! I wish there was discussion of this.
Ответить