Комментарии:
Did you make this animation?
Ответитьnobody needs to see this because these tanks exploded before they got the chance to reload XD
Ответитьjesus christ the comments
ОтветитьUSA tanks are still manual.
ОтветитьТолько у т64 пушка скорострельне чем у т72.
ОтветитьFor psychology:
Maybe the russians design the ammo storage under the turret for a reason so when the tank got shot and explode from the inside, the soldiers operating the tank wouldn't know that they were killed. Means that they will never feel any pain
ah yes, the turret ejection system
ОтветитьPeople are mocking the Russians. And yes all this Ukraine war is terrible. But this design isn't just pure shit, it has its advantages as well. And believe it or not, the west are also coming up with its own auto-loader as well. Many of Nato vehicles already have auto-loader such as self-propelled artilery and infantry fighting vehicles; just not tanks yet. But I believe we'll see soon. I'm actually excited to see American tanks with auto-loader.
ОтветитьThis Russian cutting-edge handy mechanism can double as an ejection seat for the crew in case the tank gets a lethal hit with a Ukrainian scumbag ATGM!
ОтветитьT64/t80 better as it leaves the used casings for later, but sadly both sides are kinda outdated and new tanks need to be created
ОтветитьIt doesn’t matter if you have blow out panels or an carousel auto loader, a lancet drone will send you into space
ОтветитьWhat people don’t know is that T-72s are used in the Ukrainian war and they found the weak spot. The amo
Ответить開罐頭專用炮台
ОтветитьSlow
ОтветитьNow this, this is a masterpiece
ОтветитьWow the Russian federation’s space program is really unique in their rocket designs
ОтветитьGreat, now I know where to shoot
ОтветитьThe comments: "lol, the turret flying" 🤓 ☝
ОтветитьT-90 is the best tank in the world, not because its unkillable, but because its so versatile, easy to produce, reliable and very manoeuvrable while packing a serious punch.
Ответитьyou copied and pasted a video titled Механизмы заряжания танков семейства Т-64 и Т-72 tanks T-64 & T-72 autoloading from Sergo Borisov
ОтветитьUp and down the City Road,
In and out the Eagle,
That's the way the money goes,
Pop! Goes the weasel.
JACK İN THE BOX BOOOOOOOM
ОтветитьOptimus prime
Ответитьthat shell YEET was so sneaky i didnt even notice it after watching it twice
Ответитьif i were in command of the russian bureao of army designs i would have the T-72 and T-90 family have the turret redesigned have a whole turret sectiob entirely dedicated to store shells and the autoloader soo that in case of penetration the survival of crew and tank can be ensured by a blast vent that will result in the turret shell stocking portion get destroyed taking the bruise and leaving minor damage to the crew.
ОтветитьNot realistic, isn't in low earth orbit after taking a hit.
ОтветитьSuch a nice toaster oven design.
ОтветитьSo now to those who have no idea as to why the loader was designed like this, allow me to explain.
The T64 is the progenitor to all of russia's current mbts, the T80 and T72 are literal variants of the t64 (T80 an overall improvement, t72 was nade to be cheaper).
with this in mind the design philosophy of the tank was if it was short enough and armored enough, the tank would be survivable. The whole reason the autoloader is dnagerous is because soviet engineers didnt take too much into consideration what happens after it was penned. and in the end its not necessarily bad thinking since at the time the t64 was designed (around thr 50s) thermal optics and automated aiming wasnt a thing in tanks. So having a short tank uparmored to hell was effective. it wouldnt be till the mid 70s when tanks like the m60a3tts with thermal optics when soviet tank design became outdated
so the ammo is stored bent so it fits? That's pretty funny, also clever
ОтветитьUkraine t-64/80 looking much better than russian t-72/90
ОтветитьWorst tank ever
Ответитьthe older one is just overly complicated
Ответитьcrew go pooow whan the tank go boom
Ответитьbruh what about t 60
ОтветитьAbrams reload is 1 second faster
Ответитьis it just me or does the T-64 system seem like it should be way faster then the T-72, some parts seem slowed down in comparison to how it happens in T-72
ОтветитьWork of art 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
ОтветитьIn the t 72 and t90 when that door opens to throw that pellet from the round
Isnt it bad for war if there are toxic gases nuclear etc etc?
How do they refill the autoloader? Is there a fast option, or they have to put the shells and the charges one-by-one from one of the hatches? I saw a video, where a guy loads the autoloader from the gunners position, but that would be extremly slow.
Ответитьогромное количество тупых комментаторов которые радуются что эти танки хорошо взорвутся..
хорошо взорвутся танки-противники этих танков которые медленнее стреляют и имеют лишнего члена экипажа.
Ah, the 'flying turret' mechanism.
ОтветитьJust for people who like to whine that such autoloader is very dangerous to the crew: if some shell can destroy entire casing of the ammo storage, be sure, in any other tank without autoloader all crew: commander, gunner and loarder will be already dead. So there is almost no difference in surviability of the tanks.
Ответитьt64 best!
ОтветитьThats why russian tanks blow up like black dick when they are hit
ОтветитьSoviet space program
ОтветитьУмники есть?
Про башню?
А у Абрамса факел обогревающий до 10 метров вокруг башни…
В чужом глазу песчинку замечают,а в своем бревно!
Изменено:Что я хочу сказать,у всех танках есть бк и если туда попасть это жопа всему танку(выведение из боя с серьезными повреждениями)
US haters 2 years ago: wow what a brilliant and effective system
US haters now: so that was a fucking lie
they where going to show the t-14, but no one knows how it works not even the russian designers
ОтветитьThis is a cool looking rocket engine design!
ОтветитьThis, ladies and gentlemen, is what kills so many russian tank crew. :D
Ответить