Scientific Laws REQUIRE a Lawgiver!

Without a creator god in religoun yes but the god you worship you dont even know his name and its IN THE BIBLE....Dont believe?Melchezadek is the only man in the bible witj h no beggining and no end to which he has always been here.a god

And you are wrong...Without the core of Earth and fungus NOTHING would exist here,not god

Think about it for a moment, the Chinese were doing science completely independent of Christianity. Funny that.

How could it be so obvious! Of course laws have to have a lawgiver. Just like how trees have to have a treegiver, and how rocks need a rockgiver.

Oh wait. Your argument falls apart when you move from manmade concepts like laws (legal or recognitions of natural phenomena as in the laws of physics) and onto the real world.

All that chaos does not HAVE to have an intelligent cause just because someone claims as such. While we ultimately do not know, it could be random forces.

Is that a fun answer? That there isnt someone looking out for us, that there is no afterlife, that morality is just a paper tiger? No. But thats the answer we most likely have to live with.

Truth isnt fun, but fun is a manmade concept too. What is true is true, what is real is real.

I am glad I have the pink and purple unicorn to explain why I have the sciences!

Laws are meant to be broken thats why consequences exist.

Natural sciences are grounded in philosophy, not fairy tales.

Demonstrating a fundamental misunderstanding of science. Crazy how the Christians that intentionally reject science don't understand it.

A scientific law is a statement based on repeated experiments or observations that describe or predict a range of natural phenomena. It doesn't require a "lawgiver". That is a lot different than a human produced law as part of the legal system. The equivocation over different definitions of "law" is not very honest

Law requires a Lawgiver! And design requires a Designer. Simple enough but most atheists will reject the notion because they rebel against God.

Great video! It's foolishness to think that nature could create order on its own. God created the laws of nature. Everything that exists had to have a mind behind it. Including what governs all we see. 🙏✝️🕊️

Actually of course, we don't know why the universe behaves the way it behaves. You can just assume it is because of your favorite deity, but that would just be your claim, wouldn't it?
Saying silly things like "laws require a lawgiver" doesn't help if you want to be taken seriously. The laws of science are human inventions, based on our observations and our understanding. Following that up with a baseless barb about Darwinism somehow including a strawman version of the big bang theory just exposes your ignorance or your intellectual dishonesty. Or both.

God is a logical necessity.

I hear lots of claims and arguments from incredulity, but no actual demonstration of truth. Christians like to say words and have them magically be true.

noyce

...If we can't have science without a god, then that science should be able to prove the existence of said god.

Said lawgiver requires a daddy lawgiver 😂.

Furthermore to presuppose the lawgiver would be the one fashioned by the Christian church is a gigantic leap in logic even if we grant said presupposition. Actually the very logic that requires we grant a lawgiver persona to the universe requires we abandon certain notions of Atleast biblical literalism. So…