Core i9 9900K vs Core i9 13900K - 4 Years Difference

I came from i9 9900k for one I9 13900k and for play games i dont see any diference. In video I9 9900k was in stock, if you put i9 9900k all core in 5 ghz, you wil get 20% more FPS, no doubt. So, if you have one i9 9900k keep your processor and just be happy. :)

the bottleneck is real. i really need to pair up my 7900xtx with newer cpu+mobo+ddr5 combo. thank you for the comparison tests

The 9900k still a great cpu. Just not for the 4090

Wincing at the temps on that 13900K. Jeez.

Let's be honest 9900k still rock in sports games where u need high fps with somewhat 4070ti. And if you will play on higher resolutions with 4090 the gap would be minimum, 9900k still would be good for several years in terms of gaming and video production. To the time when 9900k would be really outdated ddr5 should significantly drop in price. Still playing on 1080p with 9900k and doing some render sessions paired with 1080ti, extremely smooth and comfortable gameplay. There no actual need at this time to upgrade to something like 13900k/7800x3d if you already have 9900k/5800x(3d).

I wonder why nothing is at 100% useage? What is the bottleneck? Ram speed?

Thank for video and comparation, im still @i7 3770K, pretty antique but still holding up. Recently got 3060ti and started seeing how CPU bottlenecks, 9900K will be a brutal cheap upgrade to me. Cheers mate

9900k now just bottleneck 4090

Still waiting for a CPU that can do 240 fps on everything

So basically... a video showing how a card for people who spend top dollar works on a 4-year old CPU at settings nobody would ever use with a card that expensive. You should have shown 1440p and 4K.
What I got out of this is that my 9900K will probably be just fine at 1440p and 4K with a 7900XTX - at least till the next generation of CPUs.

Why was the 9900k locked at 4.7 Ghz? It can easily be locked at 4.9-5.0Ghz (or 5.2 with good cooling) but unlocking it should let it boost up to 5.0 when needed.

why did you run this test at 1080p with a 4090? meaningless really

Y

Только вот он стоит как I 5 13700k так что смысл от 1151v 2 просто нет

Wonder what the gap would be with the 9900k overclocked to 5.1 ghz.

Thx

Thanks Bro for your efforts.
I was thinking to upgrade i7 6700k to i9 9900k BUT completely unworthy, I do have to buy a new system better than through trash in the trash can

can you du the same with 4080?

How about testing with an rtx 2080 instead of the 4090

Core i9 13900K - PWR 170Watt in Cyberpunk? Core i9 9900K PWR 90Watt

ehh i'll wait a few more years before i upgrade.

What a fun comparison. Thanks.

This video is using 1080p for the comparisons, why? I'm still using an i9-9900k with an MSI 4090 Suprim X at 4k triple monitor setup. Most games are at or above 60 fps 60hz so I'm happy as a clam, I'll upgrade when the Intel 15th gen arrives, that'll put the 9th gen at ~7-8 years old (roughly guessing). Any games that drop below 60 fps, I just run them on a single monitor and the frames jump to around 90+

I'll wait for i9 14900K

The difference is 4-8-12 years into the future. Core i9 13900K (1080p resolution) vs Core i9 17900K (2K resolution) vs Core i9 21900K (4K resolution) Core i9 25900K (8K resolution) VS Core i11 99900K (16K-32K resolution)

I don't understand all this discussion below.. Let me end this right now. If your gaming at 4k like me. A 9900k is just fine because most of the games aren't going to be using the cpu much. If you have a 3090 ti ,4080,4090, its not going to matter, you'll be using the GPU.
If your playing at 1440p, 4090 is overkill and is a waste of money. Hell, the 4080 is probably overkill. And if your gaming at 1080p.. WHY? I guess, of your a kid and you don't have a job or you make very little money, but still.. WHY? Its 2023! Get a 4k monitor.. They are cheap enough now. Your not a professional gamer. Move to 4k!

bit overkill to get an 4090 if your only gonna play 1080P, though I know its the easiest way to show the CPU difference, but it will be smaller in 1440P and even less in 4k

Skipping lga 1700 with my 24/7 10900k sp118 5700MHz 1,38v. Don’t have any problem with it’s performance.

4 years newer and it draws 2x the power. That is progress. Whats next? 400 watt cpus? I9 9900k wins on power for sure. 13900k is a power hog.

I wish you can also compare some even more CPU dependent games like Anno 1800, Mount & Blade 2.

Baba dang the temperature

Next up from Testing Games: gaming in 720p on a RTX 4090. /s
How much did you got from Intel for this ad video?

Bro compare the RTX 4090 i9 9900k and 13900K at 4K and 8k❤

Gosh, look at the temps! No, thank you.

Does anyone still play at 1080p these days? That resolution is gross and low

Think the more frames u get the the i9 13900k going to run much hotter for some reason , I’d lower the frame and the cpu start cooling down lol think the cpu using too more pressure holding that much frame

The difference is great due to FHD gaming resolution. The difference would be musc smaller at 4K or higher resolution. Curre try rocking a 9900K on a z390 GODLIKE, RTX 3090, 4x raid 0 sx 8200 nvme @ (6480x3840)~16:9 ratio.

The ram clock speed is nearly doubled. This is not a fair/direct comparison.

pfff, in 4k plz

13th gen is a pretty nice room heater 😂 I’d like to see it in action with water cooler 💪 also this RAM speed makes a difference

Boss what benchmark tool is this? Im using msi riva tuner but i cant get tdp and percent lows to show

Outside competitive online gaming does it really matter to play any other game beyond 120fps?

The 13900K runs so hot.

Bro what the fuck that performance difference I'd insane

Im upgrading from a 4790k to a 13900k or maybe by the time I have the money the next line will be out and ill be able to get a 14900k... but the performance difference from a 4790k to 13900k must be absolutely mindblowing if this is already like +50-70 fps

Push the i9 to 5ghz if you want it to be fair, this test is bs.

the differential in the GPU % is telling when you look at the CPU specs and FPS afterwards, it really shows how the CPUs are holding back the GPU's full potential in both cases, but especially in the older hardware

Amecia, it’s the macular!

God, I knew it, the 9900K is gimped for high frame rates, I see it all the time, 4090 sitting at like 70% but the frame rate won’t exceed 115 no matter what the resolution is, and that’s just one example

Who runs a 9900K at 4.7 Ghz?