Комментарии:
I did some research and the chances of an atomic bomb from the 1940’s (newer weapons have a fail safe that prevents this) causing an unintended chain reaction enough to destroy the whole planet is much lower than 1 in 3 million. And while it is still possible for it to have a reaction like this, it would likely only lead to an explosion 2 times more powerful. I believe it is 1 in 3 million chance for just a single other atom to react and so for the entire planet to explode the chances would be much lower.
ОтветитьDon't tell North Korea
ОтветитьThe bomb that need to destroy the world is an Anti-matter bomb from futuristic 2300, because Anti-matter is opposite of matter, means, when Anti-matter make contact with matters, it can destroy matter especially if you made an bomb that use Anti-matter energy.
ОтветитьWait cant you just create a black hole to wipe out earth
ОтветитьAnd everyone watching is a physco
Ответитьbro did not answer the question
ОтветитьTell me what is it😮
ОтветитьThe biggest bomb in history is currently still the tsar bomba, no one beat that thing, and I don't know what is the strongest modern nuke is
ОтветитьIt's safe...until its not
ОтветитьNuclear power is the way.
Ответить1961
shows one world trade
people in 69420 AD:
Antimatter Bombs
China continuing to build nukes is not quite as terrifying as if someone else was at least. They’ve always stuck to a strict no first fire policy. They don’t even have nukes deployed anywhere. They have to manually attach the warheads if they want to launch and we’d see them doing that
ОтветитьMore safier than coal. Brilliant.
ОтветитьWe are not in a parallel universe and also I knew it would be the bomb Oppenheimer made 😂😂
ОтветитьBro really believed that oke newsletter which said a 1 in 3000000 per bomb, this is untrue as it would be impossible as long as there isnt enough heat in a certain area compared to the heat being passed down to other areas, and that would be impossible for any bomb we have build so far
ОтветитьNeutron bomb
ОтветитьNo, you misunderstood the one in three million chance of setting the earth on fire. It was a one in three million chance that they were wrong about conditions that supported nuclear chain reactions of certain elements in the atmosphere.
ОтветитьWait there is a pit of fire somewhere in Europe and it has been burning sense the 70s could that be part of the chain
ОтветитьBoab
Ответитьa teaspoon of neutronium
ОтветитьThe tsar bomba was actually downgraded from the original plan
ОтветитьHahaha.... it's my shit AHHH
Ответитьa needle
ОтветитьTechnically the smallest nuke necessary won't be a nuke. It will be a nuclear power plant and just let it be already 100x bigger than the Chernobyl one that went off back in the 80's and there you go
ОтветитьBTD6 HAD TSAR BOMBA IN IT!
ОтветитьA dads fart
ОтветитьOne the nuclear winter from modern day bombs will completely cover the skymeaning no sun and no food. 😅
Ответить820 times safer than coal "chernobyl is that right"
ОтветитьI dont want to blow up the fucking world on fire
ОтветитьWhy? Whyyyyyyyyyy?
ОтветитьThe US recently: aight time to get back to my long lost explosive hoby
Ответитьbrother less than 20 years later? its 2023
ОтветитьYou can kill all complex life on earth with 600 pounds of cobalt and a 10 megaton weapon.
Ответитьworld - agrees nukes are bad
also world - still mass produces them juuuuust in case...
Nuclear energy may be safer but the garbage isnt and we have to store it for thousands of years
Ответитьnighad
ОтветитьIt wasn't a one in three chance, it was more like a 1 in 0.00000003 chance
ОтветитьThanks for talking for sixy seconds and not even answering your own question
ОтветитьThis guy is the reason they hid the dislike button
ОтветитьIt isnt even 1/3 milion chance it was a litle 0.000278% to lit the world on fire
ОтветитьMy brain when he said "set the world in fire" I don't want to set the world on fire Fallout music
Ответитьnope the 1 in a million probability is false. it was 0. read the unclassified paper.
ОтветитьMe
ОтветитьChernobyl: You see me here right now and there At the day tine, Day Time!
ОтветитьI like the part where he talked about the strongest nuclear today
ОтветитьThat one and three chances was miscalculated the chances were basically impossible
ОтветитьBro is absolutely on to nothing
ОтветитьThey thought it would might ignite the air, it did not because it is impossible
Ответить