Blue Origin's Plan for a Fully-Reusable New Glenn!

no views in the first 8 minutes!!?? bro fell off

It could be a cool heavy lift reusable rocket but it'll be really hard to catch and beat spacex at this point

New vid

That second stage with extended legs looks like bacteriophages

jarvis was just the r&d, clipper will be the name of the actual reusable vehicle

starshippppppppppp

remember me from livestream?

NG could probably benefit from a gargantuan side mounted second stage (albeit only if the design would be stable). Starship will dominate the industry. Do something like Energia. Launch really really large payloads. (Space Lasers!)

do you think they would try to catch the second stage instead since getting rid of landing gear would decrease the dry mass and increase the payload capacity?

Bro fell off only 350 views after an hour

/s

There is zero way that second stage would survive re-entry unless they plaster the sides with heat tiles like starship. The slightest bit off of the velocity vector (as you mentioned) would cause heating to the tank and most likely obliterate the aluminium fuel tank (for example, look at Shuttle Columbia).

nic3

I LOVE YOU

Stoke Space should sue Blue and say they can't use this design. And SpaceX should sue Blue and say they can't use droneship landings. They absolutely deserve to be on the receiving end after the decade of frivolous lawsuits and protests Blue has mounted.

The Stoke capsule shape is naturally aerodynamically stable, whereas Jarvis isn't... :)
Mind you, we don't know that Jarvis will land with fairings attached, it would be smarter if they drop and collect the fairings like SpaceX F9.

Other issues compared to Stoke:
Jarvis has inward facing 'aerospikeish' engines, less efficient than the Stoke config and I have no idea if they gimble for landing!
Stoke has kept their engines further back up the heatshield away from the bow shock so they don't melt.
The Stoke design has way less parasitic mass in its landing legs because it takes advantage of its naturally stable low center of mass design again.

how many times did you try the landings?

did - did you just propulsively land 2 rocket stages manually without booster guidance??

Piolet made video about blue origin when it is 16th anniversary of spaceX getting to orbit

New Glenn ain’t even flown yet shut up

After many landing failures and rebuilds, BO might have it's first successful landing before 2035!!! Go Blue Origin!!

I used to watch this channel like 2 years ago. Remembered it today and I'm glad to see it's back!

They might have many problems with re-entry of their upper space craft as we seen with spacex,but spacex is almost mastering the re-entry and landing process

Blue Origin, the world's foremost lawfare company of losers.

Let me guess, Blue Origin has no problems with FAA

What's the point of making New Glenn if we have starship?

But ain’t New Shepard an fully reusable rocket?

They can add grid fins and regular fins if they need to. They should be able to also optimize the shape of the tube, or whatever they call it on a rocket, fuselage? At any rate since it's still under development they can make changes as needed. If you got something big like that coming in hot I think there should be some kind of fins, to give it some drag and control surfaces.

I'm a SpaceX fan, but I still want to see Blue Origin and some of the other new American space companies succeed, and even Europe as well, I guess...

If anyone can do this; it is Blue Origin!😊

why not use a tapered rocket with the engines and fuel in the top and a cargo bay at the bottom? More shielding for the payload on ascent, more shielding for the engines on descent.