Why Does Light Exist? What is Its Purpose?

Why Does Light Exist? What is Its Purpose?

Arvin Ash

1 год назад

674,995 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@kimsoares3271
@kimsoares3271 - 18.10.2024 00:14

Light has no purpose. Nothing in the universe has any purpose.

Ответить
@kennethstewart2546
@kennethstewart2546 - 18.10.2024 00:23

because GOD said let there be light...... thats why DUUUUHHH

Ответить
@Jay-kk3dv
@Jay-kk3dv - 18.10.2024 12:33

Light itself isn’t even light it is just a packet of energy that easily transfers it’s energy to observers

Ответить
@D.von.N
@D.von.N - 19.10.2024 00:37

For me light is a property of the spacetime, a quantum of energy travelling from the source via a straight line somewhere else, rippling the spacetime like gravitational waves do just on a much smaller scale. It is a byproduct of the spacetime acting like a spacetime. Matter is just clusters of quanta that will eventually cool down or collapse into a black hole, which will also evaporate in zillions years. What happens with the cold dark universe, nobody knows, like nobody knows what was before and what is beyond the observable 'bubble' that keeps expanding. We will most likely never know and that's OK.

Ответить
@solonkazos1379
@solonkazos1379 - 21.10.2024 13:28

God said, "let there be light"
it doesn't look like science is ever going to get to the bottom of light. it's kind of like DNA. we're just not going to get to a complete understanding with it ever.

Ответить
@samuelburleigh1895
@samuelburleigh1895 - 21.10.2024 15:40

Life must be a lot simpler in a dark world.

Ответить
@samuelburleigh1895
@samuelburleigh1895 - 21.10.2024 15:42

I always thought light was a wave of particles.

Ответить
@TheodoreHyczko-t5l
@TheodoreHyczko-t5l - 22.10.2024 02:11

GOD said let their be light

Ответить
@marklawrence17
@marklawrence17 - 22.10.2024 03:17

Noether's theorem. The lagrangians invariance under 1d rotations requires a conserved charge with an associated vector potential field. Similarly 2d rotations imply the weak charge and a matrix potential field. And invariance under 3d rotations imply the color charge and the gluon potential field. Finally you can change this to 4d rotations - boosts - and that implies energy conservation and gravity. Unfortunately Feynman spend an entire year working on this and failed rather spectacularly. See the Feynman lectures on gravitation, by Feynman, morningo and Wagner.

But your talk doesn't even mention Emma noether.

Ответить
@JamesBarry-j7m
@JamesBarry-j7m - 22.10.2024 19:57

I'm seeing a badly decorated room

Ответить
@archlich4489
@archlich4489 - 23.10.2024 02:22

Makes me wonder if there's a kind of "light" we have simply never known.

Ответить
@Marvinmartion
@Marvinmartion - 24.10.2024 02:15

It’s a particle moving in a wave pattern.

Ответить
@MemphiStig
@MemphiStig - 24.10.2024 02:15

A physicist friend and I used to wonder about the beginning of the book of Genesis, not from a religious standpoint, necessarily, but simply from the idea that it sort of parallels the theory of the universe's actual beginning, and it seems to stem from that one crucial moment when God says "let there be light." That this is where everything begins and that it is the most meaningful event of the Beginning, whether attributable to a deity or not, seems a remarkable coincidence of the two paths, which otherwise seem to be in constant opposition.

Ответить
@slowneutron6163
@slowneutron6163 - 24.10.2024 23:31

Purpose implies intent. Function. Light can have FUNCTIONS, not purposes. This is why the intelligent design myth will not go away. FUNCTION, NOT PURPOSE. Get it right.

Ответить
@j.477
@j.477 - 27.10.2024 01:41

,,, ' let th' wise electron take you on a journey ... " ...

Ответить
@anthonyashwood1438
@anthonyashwood1438 - 27.10.2024 10:01

Excuse my ignorance but what is the life span of a photon ?

Ответить
@Leif-yv5ql
@Leif-yv5ql - 27.10.2024 10:36

Why is there air?

Ответить
@gregshirley-jeffersonboule6258
@gregshirley-jeffersonboule6258 - 27.10.2024 18:19

Why does anything exist?

Also, why assume that natural phenomena have a purpose? You don't need the concept of divine intention to explain the phenomenon of light.

Ответить
@safeasrecords
@safeasrecords - 27.10.2024 21:57

Extremeophile life appears to not need light, deep on the ocean floor around fissures and volcanoes they get their energy from the heat that is released from below the earths crust.

Ответить
@stevelindsay3643
@stevelindsay3643 - 29.10.2024 00:12

Electron Flood Theory is the theory that explains it all. Look up Roger Spurr using Electron Flood Theory. Roger first started developing the theory over 50 years ago. His research using Lasers and a venturi captured the two smallest particles known, the "White Light And Dark Light". His experiments were able to speed up and slow down the speed of light opening new doors of discovery.

Ответить
@DolphLundgrensDolphinDungeon
@DolphLundgrensDolphinDungeon - 30.10.2024 06:10

Umm. To see. Photosynthesis. Lots or things. Did you have trouble thinking of a new video idea? Here's your dislike. Try another video idea. Why is there light, seriously?

Ответить
@PrashantNanda
@PrashantNanda - 30.10.2024 06:11

energy pass from all frequancy(colors) togather makes vibration in strings and makes lights

Ответить
@paulmillbank3617
@paulmillbank3617 - 30.10.2024 11:04

What is lights purpose? I would say it has no purpose, it exists and life evolved to ask a silly question like does light have a purpose?

Ответить
@davidrobinson7684
@davidrobinson7684 - 30.10.2024 19:42

Why does light have to have a "purpose"? Who's purpose?

Ответить
@patrickmacpherson1499
@patrickmacpherson1499 - 31.10.2024 02:14

I think a better question is why does anything exist? Why is existence in any form even possible?

Ответить
@calderwood-qg7vh
@calderwood-qg7vh - 31.10.2024 17:09

THERE IS NO REASON FOR LIGHT TO EXIST, IT JUST EXISTS.

Ответить
@bradjones5107
@bradjones5107 - 31.10.2024 22:59

This is so easy to answer!!!!
Light is the pixelation of the AI Simulation.
The Double Slit Experiment proves that.
Light is a wave until it needs to be a solid. Nothing is there but a concept until it's observed.
The smallest theorized substance is energy that pops in and out of existence. Pixels. Pare that with a program that governs physics and parameters for life forms and you have the simulation.

Ответить
@snbforever
@snbforever - 01.11.2024 06:53

To see things.
DUH!

Ответить
@musicsubicandcebu1774
@musicsubicandcebu1774 - 01.11.2024 21:28

Why is only 0.0035% of it visible to the human eye? These are frequencies, only numbers. Why do they masquerade as colours? Woke electromagnetism?

Ответить
@rsinghofficial_
@rsinghofficial_ - 01.11.2024 22:00

Universe is more weird than we can imagine 😮

Ответить
@DerekS-g2z
@DerekS-g2z - 02.11.2024 01:19

I always liked "wavicle" to explain the duality.

Ответить
@Atrocitus-k2j
@Atrocitus-k2j - 02.11.2024 02:41

A photon walks into a hotel. The bellhop says, “excuse me sir, may I take your luggage?”

The photon says nothing because it must travel at the speed of light, so its speed through the time dimension is zero, and it could not possibly perceive the sound waves produced by the bellhop…

Ответить
@LAUS-DEO-HAWAII
@LAUS-DEO-HAWAII - 02.11.2024 07:29

FORGET THIS GUY. READ YOUR BIBLES, IT WILL TELL YOU LIGHTS PURPOSES.

Ответить
@nodozhit
@nodozhit - 02.11.2024 08:33

I think that light can be better explained by studying nebulae from formation to stabilization to expiration. We should do away with the big bang theory and move to big pools theory. Big poolings of gaseous elements, like primordial hydrogen atoms, attracted and activated by the fundamental forces on our plane of existence created pools of nebulae which started a series of chain reactions that ultimately created more elements and more things to react to.
I propose that every large thing within our solar system is a byproduct of our sun ejecting matter over time, especially during its early formation, its conception or pooling period, before it was birthed into the dwarf star it is today.
I propose that over time, our sun will eject another substantial sized body of matter that would baffle all astrophysicists of today who remain stuck on Einstein's groundbreaking theory of relativity and speed of light equation which might only be applicable to our solar system or Milky Way galaxy.
The black hole theories also needs to be revised because the light we don't see at the center is more a result of the matter at the event horizon revolving at super tremendous speeds creating somewhat of an impenetrable firewall and an optical illusion from afar.
(If we were able to stand on any large object revolving a black hole, then we will only be subjected to the gravity of that particular object. It will be a normal day there because of relativity).
Light doesn't bend and space doesn't warp. We are just able to see large objects behind other objects that are a relative distance a part.
Light only radiates from its sources and illuminates its source. If all light particles were equal then we all will be blinded from being constantly bombarded by light from all over this universe- all of the time.
The only universal time is now. Space-time is just a measurement like a clock and a kilometer.
The objects we see in the cosmos now are actually there now- but if we traveled the distance from here to there, then it won't be there by the time we make it to that spot because everything is always in motion and always evolving over the infinite moments of now here.
Light radiation just happens to be the lightest and weakest particle of energy being emitted from matter, whether it comes from gases, liquids, solids, or plasma, or maybe even some kind of metaphysical phase of matter which comprises all forms of matter into an inconceivable object that exists only at subatomic intervals.
But everything that exists, except for the universe, radiates whether you see it or not because the universe natural static state is absolute 0 on our plane of existence.
The thing is there may be more planes of existence in the vastness of our universe. But we are forever confined to our plane within our known universe in our galactic cluster in our galaxy in solar system on our planet.
Maybe a better understanding of Jupiter's composition of gaseous bands and bars on different planes can explain the likelihood of universal planes of existence.

Ответить
@highwayred480
@highwayred480 - 02.11.2024 10:02

Photons are carried by current 😅

Ответить
@TubeOnRichard
@TubeOnRichard - 02.11.2024 17:03

Yes anything that can't be explained is a "quantum" or a "dark". Light can't be quantum because nothing quantum can be expressed in reality

Ответить
@JeffHogge-ht4xg
@JeffHogge-ht4xg - 03.11.2024 01:57

Holy Virge your smart daddy! Your so much easier to understand than Matt Badness guy! Keep GROOVIN' me!

Ответить
@AnilKumar-xl2te
@AnilKumar-xl2te - 03.11.2024 10:24

Purpose of light is to destroy your sleep!

Ответить
@theimaginationguru6679
@theimaginationguru6679 - 04.11.2024 03:23

“Let there be Light” - Genesis 1:3. What if this book was actually talking science in fictional allegory?

Ответить
@jontalbot1
@jontalbot1 - 04.11.2024 12:19

This is not really something for a general audience. There is simply too much abstract information presented too quickly to enable the lay person to follow

Ответить
@skinthekat0530
@skinthekat0530 - 04.11.2024 17:04

light is an experience - why does Eukaryotic life respond to certain wavelengths of the EM spectrum?

Ответить
@dirtbird7415
@dirtbird7415 - 05.11.2024 06:06

Light exists for one reason.
So we men dont pee on the toilet seat in the middle of the night.
THAT is its primary function.

Ответить
@dirtbird7415
@dirtbird7415 - 05.11.2024 06:13

Isnt the beginning kinda circular logic ?
It goes " your not really seeing the object your seeing the light bouncing off the object "
So the light is bouncing off the object , so I am seeing the object.
And if nothing was there I would see ??

Ответить
@paulfuller9352
@paulfuller9352 - 05.11.2024 13:36

To enlighten one?

Ответить
@philosophyofvalue8506
@philosophyofvalue8506 - 06.11.2024 06:18

It is a mistake to ask about the 'purpose' of light, which should be replaced by 'what does it do'?

Ответить
@DD-pz3kf
@DD-pz3kf - 07.11.2024 06:59

I asked these same questions to my psychiatrist. He punched me in the face😮

Ответить
@57shredder
@57shredder - 07.11.2024 12:34

I always thought it was so I could find the bathroom at night.

Ответить
@mykrahmaan3408
@mykrahmaan3408 - 09.11.2024 12:20

This obsession of all hitherto searchers for knowledge with one single sense perception, SIGHT (hence also one single method of measurement: LENGTH. Note: the other two fundamental units, TIME and MASS, also involve "length" measurements for their quantitative specification), blinds scientists from the FACT that we have five more senses (including BREATHING as the 6th. COMMON sense, common to all 3 types of entities on the suface of the earth: PLANTS, ANIMALS and HUMANS), through which all living beings interact with the environment every second of every single day.

Nature (or GOD or whatever other name one prefers to call the Cruel Creator and Sustainer of the universe) can't be so stupid to have provided the beings 6 senses, if 5 of them can be derived as functions of just one.

Hence, Einstein's assumption as to the velocity of light as the ultimate POSSIBLE velocity of any fundamental particle, as well as current astronomy based only on optical measurements, would prove to be totally unsuitable for describing LIFE function, as the 5 types of particles influencing other senses could (SHOULD, rather ~ with almost 100% certainty) very well be capable of moving with velocities considerably (trillions of times) faster than light.

There is also the possibility of 5 more "Suns" existing at exactly 1AU away from the Center of The Earth transmitting particles that influence the other 5 senses of beings, to which obviously no nonliving instument (designed to receive PHOTONS only) could ever be sensitive.

Kepler's failed attempt to link the five regular (Platonic) solids to the planetary orbits could very well indicate that they are linkable to the releaser entity of the 6 types of sense particles (hence, indicating existence of another regular solid, MEGAHEDRON, yet to be discovered) = The Suns (fixed in space) at the 5 other rectilinear locations around the earth, as the current Visible Sun.

All apparent motions in the sky can well be (real and/or illusiory) events due to these interactions that sustain life on this earth.

Remember, none of the current formulae in physics AND astronomy (considered the 2 most fundamental of all sciences) serves any purpose in even PREDICTING accurately any EVIL on this earth, let alone PREVENTING such, which SHOULD, in practice, be the sole purpose cum criterion of proof of all knowledge.

EVIL, thereby, is defined exhaustively as DISASTERS (earthquakes, volcanos, floods, droughts, storms, accidents), PREDATION (human and animal), DISEASES (including all birth defects, all weapons manufacture, all violence) and DEATH.

Ответить