Homepage - An Open Source, Self Hosted Informational Dashboard and Bookmarks Organizer.

Homepage - An Open Source, Self Hosted Informational Dashboard and Bookmarks Organizer.

Awesome Open Source

10 месяцев назад

34,832 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@moetocafe
@moetocafe - 30.10.2023 23:17

Very nice. Thank you for the video.

Ответить
@Jody-nf2bz
@Jody-nf2bz - 12.10.2023 07:18

This video would be truly "Awesome" if it wasn't Blurry, Microscopic, and Unreadable! Thanks.

Ответить
@TheBeardedLibertarian
@TheBeardedLibertarian - 25.09.2023 19:35

Never found anything that can compete with dashy’s configuration, the only thing she hasn’t automated is widgets….

Ответить
@haydenc2742
@haydenc2742 - 18.09.2023 15:43

To do a cache refresh just hit cntl-f5...

Ответить
@SteveDICAY
@SteveDICAY - 17.09.2023 17:11

Is there a way to have user access on homepage ? I use Fenrus, so you have to log in to access the page. But Homepage looks nicer.
Imagine someone falls on homepage. He can get the links to all my sites, nextcloud, websites backends....

Ответить
@mohamedsulaimaansheriff9787
@mohamedsulaimaansheriff9787 - 17.09.2023 16:11

Is there any open source tool for Hospital Management

Ответить
@hostserve
@hostserve - 15.09.2023 13:48

Great tutorial, really impressed with your content, Thank you😅

Ответить
@geroldmanders9742
@geroldmanders9742 - 14.09.2023 06:21

Not a rant against containers, conceptually containers are a great idea. However, when Docker fails, it is not a question of if, and your container does not start back up anymore, the tools in Portainer start reporting some vague error why the container doesn't start anymore, you have just found out the hard way how arcane Docker really is.

I maintain a Wiki. It has over 18 years worth of data in it. Found a replacement for it, because the old version was convoluted to work with and requiring a vast knowledge of wiki syntax source. So I found an alternative, named: BlueSpice. And they offer a much nicer looking and very much improved workflow to enter/maintain content in a wiki. But they only offer it as a Docker version. Unfortunately, there was no way to easily migrate from one to the other, so I spent a week to manually migrate. Then a power failure happens. And that Docker container did not come back up again. Portainer just reported an error code that 3 very different ways of solving it. All 3 methods fail.

But data should not be in the Docker container itself. I fully agree, It was stored in a separate Docker container. That should keep it safe right? Not the case, that data container started, but all content in it was completely messed up. Awesome. An UPS then? That power failure? it made the UPS go up in flames. Literally. Actually had to use a fire extinguisher.

Wasted more time by trying very arcane Docker commands via the terminal, all to no avail. Suggestions made by ChatGPT and Bard resulted in nothing workable either. At this point I am quite disappointed in what Docker considers good coding practices for their container solutions and I got fed up. So I went looking again for any wiki software that is absolutely not locked in by Docker. xWiki to the rescue. It is not as "nimble" as the BlueSpice Wiki. But it sure does make up in configurability, a very good search engine and even better web-based editor that works really easy. So much more navigation options. I find it an absolute delight to work with. It can even import Word/Excel and PowerPoint presentations directly,.

There is now almost 6 times more data, images, archives in the new xWiki instance after another week of manually migrating the old wiki into xWiki. So my stance now is that anything non-essential, sure, Docker won't be a problem. For anything serious, back to VMs which, when the excrement really hits that rotating thing, do allow me to rip out usable content out of their remnant husks.

Backups you say? Again, couldn't agree more. The only one that worked, was the one I made just after setting up the Bluespice Docker containers. Just starting with ProxMox. the LXC container system system you can use with ProxMox sure seems a lot more robust, from what I have been reading about it. Again, containers as a concept are a great idea, but I sure do not understand why Docker gets as much "love" from the internet community as it currently does. In my, apparently not so humble, opinion Docker certainly isn't deserving of it.

Rant done.

Ответить
@xdandroidx
@xdandroidx - 14.09.2023 01:15

Thank you for what you do - I really appreciate your videos.

Ответить
@MK68i
@MK68i - 13.09.2023 14:50

Thank you, I love it. If only they will enable progressive web app for this dashboard

Ответить
@SB-qm5wg
@SB-qm5wg - 13.09.2023 06:05

This is pretty cool. TY For the review

Ответить
@darthkielbasa
@darthkielbasa - 13.09.2023 03:29

I’d really like to give Homepage an honest shot but I’ve grown comfortably lazy and prefer gui editors.

Another excellent production, sir.

Ответить
@DJDashzn
@DJDashzn - 13.09.2023 00:46

Hi guys Brian always talks about giving to the developers and I agree with him however, I believe that we should start with him first.

The content he makes is top class and we should all contribute something here.

Brian has personally assisted me with all my stupid questions no matter how many times I ask.

So I challenge those who can for 10 bucks each. I have done mine and Brian can confirm when he gets it.

Come guys let’s show Brian how much we appreciate the content
Dash here Brian from South Africa

Ответить
@_ytuser
@_ytuser - 12.09.2023 23:28

tysm for sharing.

Ответить
@stephenanthony5923
@stephenanthony5923 - 12.09.2023 22:55

AOS, thank you for always bringing top quality FOSS reviews and tutorials to the public. Will donate soon

Ответить
@stevenwinderlich2891
@stevenwinderlich2891 - 12.09.2023 20:27

Im still pissed about all the privacy invasions and whatnot in todays world but also ud have to lock urself away from half of the modern world if youd want privacy and often theres no way around big tech as well ugh......

Ответить
@cyberjohn44
@cyberjohn44 - 12.09.2023 18:41

Great Video. Very interesting and will take a look at Homepage.

Ответить
@coldpizza2453
@coldpizza2453 - 12.09.2023 18:36

👍👍👍👍

Ответить
@bogorad
@bogorad - 12.09.2023 18:24

I've got just one gripe with Homepage: it shows Portainers separately. I much prefer the Heimdall way - it shows the combined stats for all of my portaner-clients located on many different hosts.

Ответить
@try-that
@try-that - 12.09.2023 17:53

I use homepage via docker and OMV , I really like it.

Ответить
@soulofangel1990
@soulofangel1990 - 12.09.2023 17:44

i love your videos mate, I learned a lot about selfhosting services, I'm trying to get a job at IT really soon and I will donate to your channel as thank you for all your shared knowledge.

Ответить