The Future of the Monarchy (2024) | Full Documentary

So much and many King's to come, it isn't honestly very Good.

Simply beautiful ❤

❤❤King Charles and Prince William are the people's KING.. Harry is just Megan's husband..

Sooner Camilla wil be Queen in title than any of Diana's Children or their sons will be Kings. British monarchy is becoming to and end.

I love Prince William and King Charles!!! The Princess of Wales is amazing as well!

Africa is a continent not a country, why don't people research before saying the wrong things, (is Europe a country or a continent)

charles did NOT wait until after Diana’s death, so that part of this store is 💯 false

Waiting for the truth. Is it horrid?

The situation with Princess Catherine showed that there is no future....They completely ignore public accountability.

None of that ever happened in London because I was there.

Oh this was wonderful to view and hear. Thank you for presenting it. Loved it all!

Very much impress of both.

Please DON'T LIE we all know Charles cheated on Diana with Camilla!

I dont feel like Charles cares... if he did I wouldn't have to work.....

home? more like a mansion..... Jeffrey Epstein say his name <3

mark my words...something sad will happen will happen and harry and Meghan will be the king and queen and yall will be laughing hahahahahaha mark my words!@!!!! its easy

Queen Elizabeth II, is one of the greatest Queen in history such as Victoria and Elizabeth I,I just pray and hope that the Charles,William and George will have a good and long reign,but I think the Windsors run are coming to an end either with William or George,I hope I’m wrong

The monarchy brough shame on Harry and hid wife they treat him and his wife like dirt kick them out og the family and give them a one way ticket to canada
If Princess Diannwad alive that would never have happened but Charles dont have the balls to dtand up for his son
Oh i forget he never cared about his SPARE just the HEIR
But there is going to be a shift that will surprise a lot of people

If everything that is being said about that family Meghan and Harry should keep running this RF have too much baggage

Who knows who will be the next king no one things happened in like that can change everything
If Princess Di was alive she would be the now Queen but she is not here life is uncertain we cant predict the future we just hope for the best
Whatever will be will be

Papa you a man of your own go Papa 💙💙💙💙💙

Why not Charlotte William Arthur Chalse but instead Charlotte Elizabeth Daina

Second daughter of Prince Phillip and Kate point of correction thank you

Kate is just there to serve herself round among the male royal national cake to the royal male lol 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Mindful of history good awareness on William perspectives 💪👑🇬🇧💙💙💙💙💙💙💙

William ain't your second half you going to be on your own or best bet you go to your husband lineage in Grece i know they are still related in a way

Gold digger kate 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

He was told to marry Kate not Williams will but he has to do as he was told

Very free-minded William 💙💙💙💙💙💙

Humour in your heart and your Papa 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙

William looks so much like her mum 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙

Visionery Papa 👑💪🇬🇧💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙

Papa was going to miss the crown but God loved Papa so much so he is finally wearing the crown 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙

I don't think they have time for there children point of correction lol 😅

Elizabeth Father only ruled for fifteen years only

Was disappointed when it was said he rekindled his relationship AFTER Dianna’s death. If you can’t report correctly, you shouldn’t be doing a documentary!

Princess Catherine Queen . Prince William??? . Hope he wakes up . 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

He did not rekindle his relationship with Camilla after Diana died! He was seeing Camilla again long before that - see the Diana interview please for one thing.

Well they made this video a little too soon. Because the future is looking a bit grim now...more so daunting...

For some insane reason I have this gut wrenching feeling that the british monarchy will end with William. I think it's because they are trying to be too "normal" I don't see or think George will become king ever. And honestly what's the point of them really? Photoshopping some photos, sending condolences and then avoiding photographers and showing up in black tie and fancy dresses every week at some boring party riding in coaches and planes and opening a place here and there and then pretending to care while avoiding there own family is a disaster exploding at every seem. I don't know abolish the monarchies all together and do the democratic thing and spend tax money on stuff that matters. Let's just move away from this ancient way that is of no use at all. Honestly when was the last time they had actually any power? 1600's people for 500 years you had been spending money on them and they get up wear pretty dresses and do nothing else of any real value

As others have no doubt noted, Elizabeth II would have eventually been Queen regardless, because Edward VIII -- even "if" he had been allowed to retain the monarchy with a morganatic marriage with 2x divorcee Wallis Simpson -- would have NEVER had issue in the line of succession. Thus, upon his death, "Princess" Elizabeth would have ascended to the throne. BUT that tipping point in history -- when Edward VIII abdicated and his younger brother George VI [Elizabeth's father] became king begets MULTIPLE fascinating "what if" questions ...
1. Would WW II have ended as it did?
Remember, Edward VIII was very pro-German, and he was a vain, spoiled, reckless, "entitled" individual who loved all the beneficial "goodies" and "privileges" of royal life, BUT he HATED the OBLIGATIONS and DUTIES of Kingship. He had very little regard for his vital role as leader of the British people and Empire-Commonwealth. As such ...
a) Would Hitler's "charm offensive" "wining and dining" and flattering Edward & Wallis have succeeded in wrangling continuous "concessions" and "accommodations" for Nazi Germany such that Hitler might never have needed to bother "attacking" Poland to start WW II in the first place?
b) Even "if" WW II had started, would a decidedly pro-German King Edward VIII on the throne instead have been the "tipping point difference" over British public opinion and Parliament such that Britain would have made a quick negotiated peace with Nazi Germany in May 1940 when France and Belgium collapsed and surrendered? Don't forget that Parliament was deeply divided, that numerous respected statesmen in the highest government positions openly advocated making peace with Hitler, and that it was ONLY Churchill's steely resolve -- eventually backed by King George VI -- that carried Britain through the war in those dark early days when she STOOD ALONE against Hitler.
2. And if WW II (at least in Europe) had ended differently, what else about the world would have played out differently?
a) Would the "British Empire" have vanished so quickly -- or at least might it have lasted longer if there were NO world-wide spreading of democracy thanks to the massive influence of a victorious U.S. (which wouldn't have ever been involved in a "WW II in Europe" and thus the peoples of Europe and the British Empire MIGHT not have yearned for delf-determination as much or as immediately following WW II)?
b) Thus would Great Britain remained more of a military power as well?
c) Would the U.S. -- left to deal solely with Japan in the Pacific following Pearl Harbor -- have become the free world's pre-eminent "superpower?"
d) Would the U.S. and the Soviet Union -- devoid of all the German rocket scientists they claimed after Nazi Germany's collapse -- have perfected ballistic missile technology or had a "space race" -- or if so anyway, might it have come much later in time?
e) Given the question immediately above, would the U.S. have landed on the moon as early as 1969?
3. If Edward VIII remained on the British throne at least until 1972 (I'm reasonably sure he still received the best medical care available in the world despite being "only" the Duke of Windsor and no longer king ... such that he probably wouldn't have lived longer as king, and MIGHT have even passed away sooner as did his younger brother [both were HEAVY smokers]), would Elizabeth II possess the cache to reign effectively as Queen? Consider these points:
a) She would NOT have been as widely beloved entering her reign in her mid to late 40s or early 50s as she was as a young woman entering her reign upon tragic circumstances
b) "Princess" Elizabeth was GREATLY ADMIRED and RESPECTED among the British People upon entering her reign because of:
(1) her parents' refusal to evacuate Britain and their stalwart example of courage, leadership, and empathy throughout WW II -- often seen in their "walkabouts" comforting the victims of London blitz bombings and V2 rocket attacks;
(2) her PERSONAL CHOICE to join the British Army and contribute to the war effort as a vehicle mechanic -- not the least bit reluctant as a "royal" to get dirty or greasy along with "commoners" in service; and
(3) her incredible sense of SELFLESS DUTY and her heart rending radio address PLEDGE to the British People upon her father's death to spend the remainder of her life -- no matter how short or long -- SERVING THEM.
Without her "Uncle David's" [i.e., Edward VIII's] abdication and without a lengthy "WW II in Europe," would Elizabeth have had the opportunity to build that good will as a young woman? And "Princess Elizabeth" would STILL have NOT had the opportunity to have been properly prepared/educated to assume the monarchy. Indeed, she might have merely succeeded to the throne as a middle-aged spouse of a career naval officer.
4. Would the modern world have been so radically different in 1972 -- and would Edward VIII's reign have been so detached from the British People and so self-indulgent -- such that the British People in 1972 might have been completely INDIFFERENT to the continuation of the monarchy after the death of childless Edward VIII rather than install a 40/50-something career naval officer's wife as "Queen?"
5. OR, even IF the British People in 1972 STILL wanted a monarch and allowed Queen Elizabeth II to ascend the throne, might they have rebelled against the institution of the monarchy when everything started unraveling in the early 1990s with all the Charles/Camilla and Diana nonsense? Having NOT had the benefit of building up her personal good will and demonstrated devotion to duty over the course of many previous decades as Queen from the time of her youth (i.e., it would have only been possible since 1972 when Edward VIII died), would Elizabeth II's reign have had the strength and cache to survive all the scandals?

Many interesting Qs to ponder ...

Prince kte is so unlucky to have met prince william who is an adulterer

A king stealing the money of dead people the you have prince william the heir to throne
Accepting bribes from rupert murdochthis behavior no monarchy can survive

Propaganda at at it’s best’

No country needs a Monarchy....I predict that in 5 years time we will see the Monarchs around the world fall from grace and the world will concentrate on the One World Order........

Great documentary👏👏👏

William should have become king. Charles married a divorced woman as he was the same but I cant forgive him for his treatment of his first wife, he was having an affair with Camilla long before Diana came about,and he shouldnt have married someone he didnt love and respect.

Where is Kate ?
We all know HOMEWRECKER ROSE IS LIVING AT KENSINGTON PALACE WITH WILLIAM !
JUST GROSS BEHAVIOUR !

It's great that Prince William And Princess Catherine could have chance to be future king and queen! Love when he tried to be a survivor not a victim following his mom's death. He will be great king and prince george also will be great under the teaching of prince and princess of wales!

❤️🎥✨Nice film!