The Harsh Reality For 50% Of Women

The feminists wanted to have careers like men, but men had careers & supported families and kids.

Teaching girls to wait until 30 to get married and have children is a big mistake. Medically talking, the best quality of children and genes are brought when the women conceive in their 20s. So why is humanity going against the law of nature? Even the men's semen has a better quality and quantity when being younger. So let's abide by nature's law, instead of following people's foolish advices.

No. Since I was 18, people told me I should have children and I won't probably make a career or be happy with it. Here I am now, I have a happy career and no children. It's not because someone told me, but because it makes me happy. What's so difficult to understand about that?

I think that through the internet we are heading backwards. Because it creates insecure narcissists and turns us into loners.

I have no data about this...
It's just my observation over the last 20 years. The internet changed us. Also society...

They wanted feminism and abortions, and told men to F off… so we did😂

Two men talking about women becoming mothers and educating themselves beyond the potential of being in a relationship: brilliant.

Honestly good for them lmao

no way y'all religiously listening to a psycho supporting russia in the ongoing war

50% Of Women: Single & Childless by 2030 - So, I guess feminists did "crush the patriarchy."

I am honestly wondering if that man even came across a childfree by choice woman. They exist, believe it or not. One of them, age almost 43, is writing this comment while watching this clip in pure disbelief.

Liberal leftists are not having children. I’m ok with that.

men too. no sweat. i guess we will have a bunch of men going around without women guess lgbt will like it :D

Men & Children FIRST❕

For many women, men are a gamble. They want someone exciting, but not so bad that they get beat up in the process, or abandoned with one or more children. And then there's the men who just can't seem to keep a steady job. 'Reliable' pays out long term, or does it? How would you feel in a reliable but unexciting marriage at age 50? These questions are as old as time. Maybe the West should institute arranged marriages, with all of the tough selection work done by third parties.

In the "Me To" movement Era men are absolutely terrified to even look at a female.

I live in a retirement community of 100,000 plus people. In general the husbands die first, sometimes 10 or 20 years before the wife.
If she has no children she may have friends to spend time with during the day, but in many, or most cases, she will little or no family for emotional support.

I was raised (partially) by a mother who had a paranoid hatred of men. I say "partially" because of the years I spent in an institution for troubled children.(also brutal). For years I kicked myself thinking it was my fault. Am now in a good but demanding marriage with no children (had a vasectomy) and experiencing some satisfaction if not happiness. My mother taught me to cower before women and most walked away from me in disgust.

I would love to have 10 kids if government supported families, provided benefits, healthcare
We need more kids, but we need emotionally stable women too. It’s highly emotionally difficult for women to leave her child and go to work to provide financial support for family
All she wants it’s be with her baby till at least she and he feels comfortable to begin child care
I was ready to jump from the bridge every single day when I had to turn around and leave by baby and go to work
But I am lucky enough to have my mom to watch over the baby while I am working.
Long story short:
1. Think about women as a human
2. Provide us opportunity to decide when we ready for daycare
3. Provide normal maternity leave ( 2 years at least)
4. Provided healthcare
5. Provide reasonable price for childcare
If you want to change next generation you need start from moms and invest in them ❤

As to the Feminist shock troops who hate your remarks- they have a right to an opinion, and in general, they will not reproduce. In a generation, problem over!

Educating women is a great predictor of a country’s future economic success. It’s also a predictor of a country’s eventual population collapse, which you can see by the 50.1% statistic and that number is only going to rise. It’s a double edged sword.

and men, right?

Migrants replaced abortions

Something is not right about this guy … just be a man … and join the manos….

Studies have shown that the happiest demographic group are single childfree women. The unhappiest is single childfree men
Women often don't suffer being on their own, men do. That explains all the hate against women, especially against the happy childfree single ones.
So the headline is very misleading and straight up wrong...it's not a harsh outlook for women. It may be for men though... how dare women thrive and be happy without a man or children 😝

I think he meant by AGE 30; not 2030.

The Elites, Rich, Powerful want a world with less people... seems they did not want to just kill people massively... so make people not want to get married not want to have kids...overall birthrate DROPS... this is BY DESIGN PEOPLE... but keep in mind that WELFARE programs will go out the crapper too... when you got 30 putting in for every 1 pulling out...fine... but when it becomes 5 pulling out and 1 putting in... it will FAIL... be careful.

If a woman desires NOT to have children, no one should be telling her that is wrong.

If the “50% of women single and childless by 2030” claim you’re making is even credible in any way, that’s very convenient for your narrative that you are not acknowledging how women have raised their standards and are making different/conscious choices than their predecessors.

There will be a lot of regrets, sadness and mental problems in there future. No pun intended.

Doesn't it seem like the root cause of this is the current economic system? This is just my un-educated opinion, but the loss of consumer protections to the public have allowed vultures to transform society into cash cows. Medical care, housing, fuel, food, water, utilities, in essence the cost of living punishes men and women for being parents.

It seems like the conversation is on young men and women seeking careers and education and avoiding parenthood like it was a form of vanity, But I think that we are forgetting how expensive child-rearing and home ownership is.

I'm not young. I'm 47, childless, and decided to focus my time on starting and running a business that me a buddy started in 2017. What incentives are there for me to be a parent instead when the cost of rent is easily 50% of most people's income? That's absurd. Its ridiculous

I was in a family that struggled, and I refuse to do the same. How could I have ever been expected to start a business with a family in tow; let alone pay a mortgage or save money while being pillaged by the crooked financialization our entire lifestyles.

Why would any woman or man risk utter despair and exploitation in an economy that practically uses your family as hostage's to squeeze more money out of them?

I wanted to get married and have children, but my parents did not allow it. My dad was a Pedophile and wanted me for himself, and my mother was co-dependent and super-possessive so leaving home to get married and having your own family was not allowed because she didn't want to be alone. Now I'm old and all alone. Don't let that happen to you!

Kids want there mums at home, otherwise you will pay the price...long term..

There's a cost to pay for both genders for chasing the brass ring. For men you will lose out on exposure to, use whatever term that suits you at this point: Wholesome, caring, honest, family oriented girls. For women you will lose out on exposure to men who are looking for a life partner for a home, family, soul mate, dance partner etc. No man I know has ever asked "How much does she make?", in a discussion of potential dates. Men, if you are working 50-60-70 hrs a week for that hypothetical hottie you are better off keeping your money and hiring a prostitute. Women, if you are pursuing the 666 you will of course have to sacrifice: Proprietary possession, evenings of couple solitude, fulfilment and enjoyment of life with that man beside you. 100's of millions on both sides have gone down this road and look where it's brought us.

Islam is solution! Embrace Islam and you will multiply like rabbits.

Oh, they do think that everyone on them is incredibly unique. A sign of not understanding how probabilities and statistics work…

Newsflash: telling women to act like men is a really bad idea. Firstly, they can't compete with actual men unless circumstances are tweaked in their favour through legislation. Second, men don't want to settle down with aggressive, competitive women. Men want a partner at home, not a rival. Men go out to work to compete, they don't want to have to do it at home as well.

Both men and women get told their careers are the most important thing... Its rubbish. Careers turn to dust when you retire.

A lot of women want more children than they have, according to stats there’s a gap between desired and actual number of children in all countries with low birth rates. Women need to find a suitable man who also wants children with her to have a child, but with modern dating culture it is more difficult. The more progressive the place, the less people marry, the effect applies to both genders. I would have liked to get married and have kids but it’s improbable. Plenty of women end up alone because of circumstances or bad partners.

“Pay the most attention to your most productive people, because they’re bringing in the bulk of your revenue”.

- Every high school sports coach who ever lived

The fact that the top comment on a JP video is defending women actually warms my heart. I expected your average incel cesspool filled with virgins who don’t understand that men and women have a drive to reproduce, and women aren’t just baby machines.

18 & 19 we aren't women as yet. Maybe by 50, we're grown up. Financial means, housing, home help and above all the right husband and partner. It's a crime to bring kids into poverty and no future. I provided for myself and it was the best I can do. The emphasis on having a child and be single changed as well as financial benefits and supportive housing. At 75, I couldn't have children because the male partner came first. As a grown up, you have other life options. I've lived an extraordinary life, free from debt, travelled and did it my way.
I keep changing as I age because I grow.
By the way, I'm still going out and living my dreams despite being a low income senior with Fibromyalgia. I did have a baby but he died prematurely. There are all kinds of stories. No. We can't have it all. Life will out. It's ok.

For sure most of these women have children alright! They are just not on this planet! They are aborted and in heaven, hoping mommy repents and is allowed into heaven herself.

Children are Expensive and many do NOT obey their parents. They can be a huge liability in this day and age, especially for working class folks who are trying to keep a roof over their heads, and put food on the table. When I was a kid, me and my little brother Bobby sold GRIT newspaper door-to-door and gave all the money to mama. How many kids would do that today? They move home at age 30 (due to "failure to launch") and expect to LIVE FOR FREE in their parents' home without helping to pay any of the bills. THIS IS WRONG. When the Bible says: "IF he/she does not work, neither should they eat," it means you have to get off your dead ass and HELP OUT.

Peterson is a Netanyahu poodle giving tongue baths. He has blood all over himself.

Single and childless sounds ideal to me.

As you are listening to this podcast, be cautious that it is the positionality of two white, males speaking on behalf of women. These perspectives shift signicfally if you hear the voices of per say African American women or latinas, etc. ❤

"... this small percentage of hyper/competitive men?" And that's the point, everyone! All of the 'equality' conversation seems to be based around a minority of workaholic males. Does that sound like a healthy, realistic comparison? Nope!

Is it a harsh reality, or is it the final nail in the coffin of patriarchal bias, realised by the financial independence of a section of professional women?

Top professional sportspeople are expected to have a relatively short active career, early to mid-30s, before they relax into punditry and/or live on their own recognizances, assuming they have put aside a sensible proportion of their income and winnings. Professional sports clubs and society at large have no problem with that scenario. A sportsman who continues up to the age of 40 is an anomaly, a weirdo!

What is the difference between that scenario and a qualified, committed, effective woman working at the top of her profession until the biological imperative of child-bearing takes over?

As usual, a different set of criteria are applied to women in a circumstance that is entirely equivalent to a male professional sportsman. JP only thinks he is unbiased; in reality, he is affected by the biases of the generation he was raised by.