The Speculum Hasn’t Changed in 175 Years. Until Now | Meet Nella

Sorry but this "revolutionary", "reinvented", "designed by women for women" speculum seems to me 1:1 Graves design. Can not see any improvement e.g. as Graves had bring in past - compare to old Sims speculum almost 200 years ago. Stainless steel survived whole doctor career, just required autoclave for sterilization. Plastic design was way back - paid by pacients, generating plastic waste which will remain on this planet centuries after exam and sh*tpile every day more and more. I went through pharmacy and struggle to find tampon bigger then 1cm in diameter, when gynaecologist need usually around 3cm diameter for tools. Maybe you can explain yours "more like tampon" statement. My wife quite often receive 3cm in diameter (standard Graves stainless steel medium size) and usually she really enjoy this, so I also do not understand the terrible suffering which women endure in silence in Ob/Gyn offices for two centuries.

There are so many logical fallacies here, it’s insane. As a woman and I hate the rhetoric of this commercial. “Designed by a man.” Whoever that man is, he cared about helping women’s health enough to go through the difficulty of inventing something, saving millions throughout the centuries. It just seems ungrateful and is a desperate selling point. Perpetuates the idea that if someone isn’t a part of the audience they’re designing something for, it “must be bad”.

Second logical fallacy “when speculum of 1885 looks like the speculummof today” — just because it hasnt changed doesn’t automatically mean it’s bad.
Not bashing the product, just want viewers to stop giving value to logically flawed arguments.