EU5 Will have a DYNAMIC trade system! + European political mapmode

If they paralelice it properly, this is what has been wanted for YEARS now. I guess 16 core / 32 thread CPU could be a godsend.

These videos make me really hyped for EU5!

I dreamt of dynamic trade down in rwanda, let the great lakes be the center of the world

I hope they look at MEIOU and Taxes for all of the cool things they do

Have a feeling that EU5 will be a micro management nightmare. 😕

I mean it looks interesting and like it will be good fun but man is it different from EU4 and i like EU4 so thats a little worried. Like yeah people say eu4 is a bit of a boardgame, and its true, its gamey, but its a good game i think.

imperator: victorian universalis looking pretty good.

This feels like they’re doubling down on Vicky 3 mechanics while Vicky 3 was a huge failure??

Well shit, now im sure that my computer will not be able to support EUV... shame it is

Sicily when 🥺

So Victoria mechanics in Europa Universalis

The "Eastern" in the medieval Roman Empire name is a modern construct. At the time they called it just Roman Empire.

I just hope there is warfare in this game.

You said that there was an interesting dev diary. Where can i read this?

10/10 Tinto talk though

Idk why people are talking about March of the eagles and Stellaris, the dynamic trade system shows it is clearly a sequel to Europa Universalis 3.

Thank god because the first time they tried to make a sequel to eu3 they made a game that was a piece of crap and totally worthless

lets hope they will not ruin the military like vicky 3

Ahhhh it reminds me of EU3 where i would make my own trade node in Danzig only to take over other ones with it xD

What about the dynamic dlcs they're going to release? Or all features that will be missing on release day? How many dlc they plan on releasing before its a finished game?

Hmm, at least one thing is wrong about that coloured in map. Denmark in 1337 is a de jure only kingdom that controls pretty much no territory. So Scania is all wrong it should have a border in it between Scania and Blekinge belonging to Sweden and Halland to Mecklenburg.

Yeup. EU5 is screwed,

Changes in price over time period are probably about price revolutions. Like in about 30-40 years from start date, after discovery of silver in saxony/bohemia region and tirol region, when over one lifetime prices jumped x3-4 times, comlete shock to people, guilds and economical stability. And another one, after new world gold flooded Europe, increasing prices again for x5-7 times. In less then a hundred years feudal economy was broken to the point beyond managing or fixing.

The real Victoria 3

i just hope there is some sort of automation in all of this trading and building system.
it all seems to in depth and becoming tedious to manage if you are doing world conquest runs and own half of the planet.

This trade system is really hype. Would love playing a pure trade focused nation.

They really have to cook with this game, if this falls flat that would be bad for paradox

I wasn't that excited because of new game for years. And i found map of 1337 much more interesting. Ireland, British Isles, Poland and southern Rus, northern Rus, Anatolia, Balkans. All those regions looks suitable for quite fast uniting them with more than just one tag what gives great ability to play same region but different tag. Also on Rus , Baltics and in Anatolia play styles can be very different if we would try to conquer region by this or that religion nation.

"I was in RIga last week :D"

anyone else assume zlewikk was bald because they always saw him with the hat on

crusader victorialis 5

it's funny because in EU III we had that already

Cant believe they're making stellaris 2

March of the Eagles 2 looks great!

Let’s GOOOOO