Комментарии:
Not gonna lie…I’ve seen your videos before, but damn…this took the cake! Well done Fulton! Well done!!! Haven’t laughed this hard in quite awhile! Thank you for your service!
ОтветитьTypical cesspool, comparing 125 and 150 knots, what an abomination.
ОтветитьThe person "playing" the keyboard is making comparisons in simulators?
You're very smart.
Sorry but why is in mfs god mode on?
ОтветитьFirst one was because in MSFS collision damage might have been turned off 🤦🏻♂️
Ответить4-2 for xplane bc wind more realistic and collision too
Ответитьthe wind part in mfs killed me 😂
Ответитьflight sim microsft just has better world graphics but xplane 12 beats it on every part in my opinion
ОтветитьMSFS has always had crap physics. Xplane is a lot more true to life however this video didn’t really show it. But in general xplane is much more realistic with handling then MSFS
MSFS feels like an arcade game
Do you do this directly? Obviously, MFS2020 is much better than Xplane 12. You directly find some lame mistakes in that game and put them in, then you say that's the truth. If you don't believe it, buy it. But don't believe the lies.
ОтветитьThat video is false if you put mfs2020 in arcade mode, well, of course, put it in realistic mode, everything at its maximum, and we will see the behavior and someone who has used xplane since the first version tells you this.
Let's be honest, this is not football.
So i saw on the hard landing you accidentally gave a point to msfs but its fine aswell as on spin maneuvers but it ok
ОтветитьIn this comparison, the two simulators are very poorly configured since the realism and the models are in game mode.
Ответитьxplane is a very good flight for those who dont have the best pc
msfs is a very good flight sim for the unltra pc 4090 simulation ones.
n
i
Да ладно вам, в серии МФС специально убрали физику падений и разрушений. В том числе по этическим соображениям.
ОтветитьI want to see realistic crash physics, aircraft damage and disintegration, as well as realistic explosions. I would snatch it up right away. I have Xplane 11 with mods but there is no mod for what I want.
ОтветитьBecause X-Plane cannot sync real-time weather, I still prefer MSF2020.
ОтветитьOhio collision physic in MFS
ОтветитьI see FSX is up to its old tricks again.
ОтветитьThe hard landing was better on xp12 in msfs it just weirdly bugged and the position of the nose stayed the same for a few seconds. really unrealistic
Ответитьredo
ОтветитьBro, the only thing i'm agree with is the collision, for all the others stuffs, XPlane is way more better, i can't understand how you can give the point to mfs in hard landing or extreme wind
Ответитьis it possible to satisfactorily run Xplan11 or 12 with 5600g?
ОтветитьMfs is the best
ОтветитьSo you gave points to the losing game? You really make no sense
ОтветитьBro he is literally using the arcade physics mode for mfs to make the sim looks bad. This is an unfair comparasion
ОтветитьExcuse me? Wind goed to xplane, because in real life a plane doesn’t randomly fly away with wind. And the landings xplane won too, because the suspensions and sound that msfs 2020 doesn’t have. So xplane has to take the win.
ОтветитьThe way you give points to MSFS while just not doing the stuff correctly on X-Plane is hitting me back in the throat. I almost threw up. This is, sadly, not a well put together video. Sorry
ОтветитьMan i was an XP player for years , i knew there was other FS but i never tried them, a few days ago i decides to buy MFS 2020 and i was stunned !! I was playing xp 12 and when i entered mfs 2020 i just flipped, like the way the menu is set up , the airplanes the world map quality, the way you can select departure and arrival is just crazy, graphics are crazy. I dont get how some ppl say “ oh but in xp the wings bend different, bla bla bla” bruh , mfs for me is 10000% better , physic and graphic wise. Ive been an xp user for the past 4 years and i gotta tell you , they stayed behind. Mfs is more advanced period.
ОтветитьFS2020 Physics? 😂 X-Plane best ever
ОтветитьX plane 12 is more real than MSFS
ОтветитьHard landing not comparable. High wind - I had older X Plane some years ago and when I tried 172 in wind higher than her normal flying speed, I lost the wings practically immediately after take-off. There is no overstress damage model anymore?
Ответить5-1!
Ответитьthat was some bouncy water
ОтветитьThe crash physic of msfs 2020 is hilarious😂😂😂
ОтветитьOkay, hear me out. But it's obvious with the skew....
In neither sim if you do a proper water landing it's realistic, but it also depends on the crash settings
If you have crash settings on in MSFS your screen fades to black and the sim prompts you to restart or go to the main menu. In MSFS the only way you can crash is if you and see the "aftermath" is with crashes off and thus not what you showed in the video will happen.
Hard landing test wasn’t in favor of MSF2020 it didn’t sound like hard landing, collision test is also not in favor of anybody, both sims has ghost houses and objects, but the most important thing is VR performance, and that’s where X-Plane shines and beats MFS2020 by far… I was really disappointed in MFS VR mode, even after upgrading the shit out my computer - it still sucks compared to X-Plane….
ОтветитьWhy are you comparing a 737 that does not have fly by wire and a plane with fly by wire. The fly b wire is impossible to roll but the 737 theoratically can roll in pilot command but not the a320. thats an unfair comparison
ОтветитьThat’s the only thing missing in both games. Physical damage and explosion. This would make msfs2020 amazing.
ОтветитьBro you had me until the turned off damage crash in Microsoft flight simulator 😂
ОтветитьBoth shitty
ОтветитьFor the spin physics in MSFS, it's simply because you're using an Airbus without turning off its flight computers!
Ответитьfake
Ответить