The Biggest Lie About Carbon Capture

I mean the train capture is the stupidest idea ive ever heard of . There is no excess energy in the train; u need energy to move it. That electricity should be put back in the motor rather than going to multiple state changes which increase the loss. Not to mention that you will destroy the aerodynamics with that duct.

To an extent that planting trees is a much better idea . T

Thats what happens when u identify the opinion u want to reach and then anlyse.

so 4 parts per billion, 0.04% of our atmosphere is CO2, and that is how we are hoping to manage the climate of the Earth - 0.04% of our atmosphere is our focus???

The state of Louisiana is injecting millions of tons of co2 byproducts in old abandoned oil wells under our water source. They will make billions of dollars in the next 10 years then leave these small communities to deal with future water contamination. :(

2 questions for the admin of this page


1. What is your creative solution for this problem?


2. Why didn't you mention using Co2 for the process of photosynthesis in greenhouses, which is a very important issue

thank you very much. You explain the false road we may take very clearly.

carbon capture is a joke it's like shooting a freight train with a bb gun

Cyclic economy?

Yes Ofcouse it’s a lie

And carbons effect on climate is also a
Lie

We have been hosed

Lie with a lie

An example of ignorance: this video.

. . . uh, please, consider the physics people. Use the energy to displace fossil fuel consumption and leave the carbon safely locked away in the first place. Plus, that train thing is surely an investment scam.

It’s called a tree, just plant a fucken tree.

The Idiocracy generation.

Oil companies don’t randomly frac locations and say whoops no oil here.

This clown is insane and knows nothing about science

Ground water, drinking water, is in the ground where you want to inject industrial waste? You sir, are an idiot.

TL;DR the viable bits: Carbon Capture is a fake-out created by fossil fuel and big tech companies to enable them to keep "business as usual" and not change their bottom line.

I'm disappointed, and even wanted this video to be on 1st of April.

Want to sequester carbon? Sequester a CEO to a prison or compost.

“The biggest lie”… goes on to start video with lies about “climate change” caused by CO2

Carbon dioxide is one thing. Air pollution is another. There is only one part CO2 in two thousand and four hundred hundred and ninety-nine parts of the gases nitrogen, oxygen, argon and traces of neon, krypton, xenon and helium in the atmosphere. Atmospheric CO2 is not a pollutant.

Welp, another channel blocked from my feed thank you very much

By reading comments I'm not subscribed,

Thunderf00t debunked this quick.

Great we are at dangerously low level of CO2 so lets suck out the rest also so we kill all plants. Strange how the temperature sunk a lot during the 1970:s but the CO2 level kept on rising. Even from 2008- 2015 CO2 went up but temperature stayed the same. But of course why wouldnt we trust THE SCIENCE they have only got it wrong like 40 times about the climate the last decades im sure they get it right this time. Enjoy the snow you soon want see it anymore, Artics will be ice free, we are heading towards an ice age and now we soon are going to boil away. Most of this was supposed to happen many times and a long time ago and yet we havent seen any of it come true. Who know they might get something right for once one day.

We need more C02 not less

The CO2 capturing train... Snowpiercer anyone?

And of course this type of video gets the most view... What am I thinking...

170.000 people misinformed. Well done on withholding important information for cheap drama!

No it sucks some but not anywhere near an efficient amount out of the are you have to put it directly over the smokestacks and you got to be able to filter the air out

You know it makes sense to me rather than put a carbon capture device just at any old place at a power plant why not put it directly on the smokestack so it sucks up all the CO2 brings it in through a filter condenses it into basically activated carbon pellets and then we can put it back in those holes where all the oil has been extracted or it's harmless and then we can put random carbon capture things you know capture and random amounts of carbon all over the planet there's ways we could do this just have to spend the time and effort do it

The uk produces around 400 million tons of C02. Excess C02 causes climate change. So 400 million tons of C02 - ? = ? To reduce or remove.

Thats the math. Cured concrete. Bio mass, biosphere, ocean, industry. All sequester C02.

To tell someone they need to make any changes without collating the data on non sequestered C02 (excess) is no different than saying Net Zero has already been achieved.

Before we criticise Oil and Gas companies for being profit driven, just remember that this capitalist mindset is the only reason why Carbon Capture technology exists in the first place. If there is no money then there will be no CCS. Capitalism is the only reason why we have many useful things, like breakthough medical technologies that save lives.

People really need to educate themselves on how these things before simply labelling them as "evil".

I think you’re attracting the wrong audience with your title….
And I see that something is messed up about Americans reading the comments.

Don’t worry, “I’m a physicist” means nothing.

(I have a PhD and I’ve seen many who have PhDs who don’t deserve it)

Just quit mowing the grass if you're worried about carbon. It's free to stop and it looks way better.

the only critical thinking element here is the concept that co2 is the main cause for global warming

You talk about the Evil Oil Company, yet these Evil companies make all your plastics, the glasses on your face and all the solar panels and wind generators. You are not FABULOUS… Liberals are so short sighted , we also have twice as many trees using CO2 than the CO2 mankind produces.
What is the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere ???
It’s 0.04%
Trees need a minimum of 0.02% to live.
Listing to this group just need causes (any cause) to stand behind to feel good about themselves.

I feel this guy was the university student who used all his focus to draw colorful figures, and then got a D.

Why don't we just extract CO2 out of the air and find a way to make products out of it

Has ASAPscience released any content addressing the stupidity of this idea or is it safe to assume hes a charlatan?

And… using nuclear plant chimneys picture as an exemple of co2 production… no, no, no….

What what what? A train with an electric motor that generates current when the train brakes? 😂

This is all stupid beyond belief. It's not even wrong.

There is so much misinformation in this video!

The trees comment could never be more wrong, there are more trees in the northern hemi sphere then there has been in the last 100 years. The Forestry industry plants more then they cut down, otherwise the industry would cease to exist; hence why tress are labeled a renewable resource.

Surprised this video hasn't been taken down yet. This is just really, really, really bad science. Yall shat the bed with this one.

Just build 1000 direct air carbon capture facilities on all geothermal power stations. Problem solved, unless climate change is a hoax.

WTF did I just watch, this is a joke, right?

No

The electrolisis process takes energy and minerals. Where are those ones going to be taken from?