Комментарии:
America's 9 Amphibious Assault ships are larger and more capable "carriers" than all those listed below number 10. You can not say it is because its classified as an Amphibious assault ship because Russias carrier is classified as a cruiser! Do better research. USA has 9 small "carriers" / Amphibious assault ships, and 11 Super carriers. The ONLY carrier in the world to my knowledge that has NEAR the capability of a US super carrier would be France's Charles DeGaul. Yet it too barely tops the abilities of an American Amphibious Assault Ship. BARELY
ОтветитьUSS wint be in service in 2026 😢
ОтветитьKuznetsov??? LOL!!
ОтветитьI'd include fusion lithium demand to evolve tritium in future plant
ОтветитьBeing 2023 now after seeing Russian equipment preform, I wonder if anybody has buyers regret or regret designing their equipment after Russian design.
ОтветитьAll the U.S.A. has to say is phuck around and find out!
ОтветитьDo a video of submarines
ОтветитьCalling Kuznetov and aircraft carrier is an insult. That thing can’t do anything.
Ответитьyou forget the Italian Trieste carrier!
ОтветитьI think the HMS QE is really for QE2 the two towers make me think that.
ОтветитьWith modern munitions and STOL aircraft, huge aircraft carriers are an extravagant absurdity both economically and operationally. Small and numerous is a far wiser strategy. Nuclear powered engines are little better - because they effectively deny the ship access to ports and impose a scarcity of spare parts, tools and skilled personnel in the event of a breakdown or combat damage. Big nuclear ships are only useful to countries like the US, intent on asymetric warfare against weaker countries far from its own shores. In short, there is no excuse for them.
ОтветитьThe US is now and has been the largest,best equipped and trained armed forces in the history of humanity. Historians will talk about our military might like they talked about Rome and Egypts. Never in human history has 1 country outworked,out thought and out worked the rest of the world like the US did and does. If we so choose we could conquer the entire world.....easily. that's your scope and perspective
ОтветитьUS military is built to handle war on 2 fronts, solo.
ОтветитьWow. Usa has soooo much money to develop an aircraft carrier
ОтветитьArrived on time. Granddaughter said it really helped to carry her new baby and still have a hand for her two year old to hold
ОтветитьDangit another stupid computer voice video channel now I need to dust of the do not reccomebd this channel button again.
ОтветитьDang. This video makes me tired.
Ответитьis the vikramaditya stable or still sinking😂
ОтветитьThe Japanese largest Warship, The Izumo is Considered an "Aircraft Carrier " in disguise and is probably the still small compared tp these Giant Aircraft Carriersm
ОтветитьChina 🇨🇳 3rd Aircraft Carrier Fujian is about the Size between the fellow Chinrse Shandong and United States 🇺🇸 Navy Nitmiz class Carrier.
ОтветитьThe Former British Aircraft Carriers Invincible class will be in-between the Spanish and Queen English class Aircraft Carriers.
ОтветитьUS sure is compensating a lot. ^^
ОтветитьFlyboys and Navy commanders,/ captains. The people, whose wives call me, at 66 yrs old, to do that 100 ft tree over the house, because, they don't trust hubby up there with a chainsaw.😂
ОтветитьKilling people, and massive ships to make sure it happens. Hasn't changed in 10s of thousands of years. Welcome to the world.
ОтветитьI served on the USSNimitz USMARDET. 1991 to 1993
Ответить"She"
ОтветитьWhere is Fujian and Vikrant
ОтветитьVideo is only a year old but is way out of date! Useless.
ОтветитьI am happy that majority is from the biggest democracy in the world and not from F.E. China or India.
ОтветитьHORRIBLE computer voice ruins this video. If you cannot afford a human narrator, you cannot afford to give us accurate information. This is a trash video.
ОтветитьAnd the LHDs? Carry aircraft but not carriers?
ОтветитьThe Kuznetsov should not be in this list because it is a dual-purpose ship, and it's... not good at either one of them.
ОтветитьThialand & Spain won’t be considered aircraft carrier
ОтветитьI think it's easy to recognize the fat bully of the world :)
ОтветитьRussia does not have aircraft carriers. The Kunetzov shown here went to the junkyard.
ОтветитьThe Chinese strategy is not to compete by building a load of Carriers, they are instead making something much cheaper. Supersonic drones missiles, that can be launched into space and drops to sink the carrier. The supersonic missiles drone speed is mach 6, which is impossible to defend against.
ОтветитьI'd love a video explaining just why the US believes it needs to be this armed. I can't help feeling it doesn't, it just has an economy that is addicted to military employment and can't ween itself off. No country has held a candle to the United States' armed forces for decades, arguably since WWII, yet it doesn't downsize. Compare that to the armed forces of Europe, which have all reduced massively in the post-war period.
ОтветитьNow china thinking if all the aircraft cariers are in west philippine sea and back ups by thenavies of australia,japan,south korea,india and Asean countries what will happen to the coast China
ОтветитьYou skipped half of the US carriers, which are larger, more powerful, and carry more fixed wing aircraft than many of the ships on this list.
ОтветитьChinese crap
ОтветитьYou totally forgot the America class US light carriers.
ОтветитьIf UK Navy matches US there borders unpentrable USA can't defend borders
ОтветитьMe too but they need to upgrade anti air and other than Raptors and aircraft carriers don't have anything relevant going forward Russians have anti air systems on lock, UK has fleet on lock, Germany has tanks on lock, France has amphibious vehicles on lock although Americans sheer numbers are unmatched
ОтветитьNo aircraft carrier to Philippines Please... one aircraft carrier to Philippines please?🥺🙏🇵🇭🥺🙏🇵🇭🥺🙏🇵🇭😢
ОтветитьTurn the stupid narration off
ОтветитьThere are some mistakes, for example on the british ships Typhoons are pictured, but the Typhoon isn’t carrier capable. Also the Gerald R. Ford class carrier is also a supercarrier
ОтветитьChina, like Russia, has a lot of crusts to eat before it can claim to match the firepower of the US... God save our friends USA (from Canada).
ОтветитьThe amount of American "F*** you" is amazing and puts a smile on my face.
Ответить