Комментарии:
Its all just ridiculous.
ОтветитьThere know public safety check when it comes to speaking and exercising my first amendment ,so there shouldn't be be restrictions for the second.
ОтветитьGreat for Oregon, does little to help the rest of us. The US Supreme Court needs to take up this issue and bitch slap the blue states that continue to stomp on our God given right to self protection😡😡😡
ОтветитьAnd how many times have we seen this?
Ответить1st amendment, protesters are protected and burn down the city. Considering the 2nd, they prevent responsible citizens from defending themselves. Stupid and absurd; zero common sense
ОтветитьOur elections are not secure in oregon
ОтветитьAgreed…, anytime anything is debated by an Oregon based court or politician, then there’s NO chance for justice. F Oregon. Hopefully Trump will clean out the unconstitutional riff raft that’s in control in Oregon.
ОтветитьA second amendment was not created for self-defense. Why we have allowed this to be some kind of criteria when deciding these cases is ridiculous.
ОтветитьThank you
ОтветитьWhy do we have a govt entity deciding what is constitutional or not? The constitution was created to protect the citizens from govt. So no part of the govt should have a say in it. Including any court.
ОтветитьThank you for keeping us informed.
ОтветитьYessir
ОтветитьI have a question.
I know it is off subject...
Can a state (Colorado) pass a law that prohibits safe firearms target practice in the National Forest?
Most people don't know " well regulated " meant having a full kit including everything required to fire ball ammunition. Local communities would muster their citizen army. If you weren't well regulated and could be fined.
ОтветитьWhat ever happened to if state laws went against constitution it was immediately cancelled. Im so tired of living in this stupid liberal state. The politics dont represent Oregon, they represent portland and Eugene
ОтветитьYes!
ОтветитьThere's open voter fraud in Oregon. When 114 was being voted on, they invalidated thousands of votes to push it through, and when caught, they just laughed about it. Mail in needs to be illegal, and all of those involved in voter fraud need to be in prison. Also the entire permit to purchase is a scam. People, including LEOs that have permits, and taken classes, are not exempt. There is no new process. They created a method that doesn't exist, to ban everyone, and put gun stores out of business. People need to realize this. If you have taken the classes, and have a concealed carry permit, you still cannot buy a new gun. It's a flat out ban. Also, yes, Article 1, section 27 voids it all anyway, as well as the 2nd Amendment.
ОтветитьWell what the hell is being done against fucking California? And this communist regime?
ОтветитьThis is the peoples republic of oregon we are talking about. All three branches of government are dominated by fascist democrats whose only care is keeping power. This is an opinion, but the actions of this state government have proven this statement true.
ОтветитьNever comply and watch how things get
ОтветитьThank you. I'm crossing my fingers.
ОтветитьI live in Oregon their not taking mine I will not comply
ОтветитьDon’t stop shit just helps criminals
ОтветитьCriminals don’t care they need to go after them not us.
ОтветитьWhen you take away high capacity magazines from the criminals, then you can try to take high capacity magazines away from law abiding citizens.
ОтветитьAmendment II
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,
the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed............Nothing more nothing less.
Algorithm
ОтветитьBump
ОтветитьTo anyone who still thinks gun control is for crime its not the left wants total control because their communist and they cant have it if half the citizens are armed
ОтветитьThe pressure needs to be on the SCOTUS, They need to get off their asses and give us our country back
ОтветитьTired.. done talking… just say when.
ОтветитьRound and round and round we go! Fucking joke.
ОтветитьCalifornia is going to institute dermal chips so only you can us your marked gun.
ОтветитьI should at the least be able to carry full magazines in my favorite guns.
Ответить"Magazines aren't arms but also they are deadly weapons we need to ban"
ОтветитьThe most disturbing thing about these cases is that the judges base their conclusions and decisions on their political leanings and affiliations rather than the language of the US Constitution which clearly states that our right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, and that the people have every right to form and are innately part of the militia, and that the militia must be well regulated, or in essence properly functioning, trained, and equipped to modern military specifications for infantry and cavalry. In plain, simple language, this means that individuals have every right to keep and bear modern state of the art arms which are defined as any single human portable anti personnel weapon such as select fire assault weapons, pistols, knives, bats, and other anti-personnel weapons. Individuals don't have a right to explosive rockets, naval vessels, tanks, artillery, nukes, bombers, fighters, and other weapons of mass destruction.
ОтветитьAll gun laws are unconstitutional infringements. Denial of a constitutional right is a felony under 18 USC SS 242. Why are politicians who deprive 2A rights under color of law not pursued criminally?
ОтветитьThe Democrats future play will be to restrict magazines to 1 single round. If they can limit them to 10 rounds because "magazines are not arms" there will be nothing to stop them.
Its a shame that the 2nd Amendment is not a right but a favor or privilege in America.
The goal of the Democrats is to DisArm Every Law Abiding American Citizen, and they are absolutely winning in most areas.
The 2nd Amendment has become a favor or privilege given by the government, that can be easily restricted or taken away with a simple stroke of 1 Politicians pen. This has happened in many American states and it will continue to happen in more, it is no longer a Constitutional right of the people to bear arms.
If the US Supreme Court wasn't filled with a bunch of Cowards, they would have ruled on the statement "Shall Not Be Infringed" Decades ago. The definition of that one statement is all that matters, but these spineless cowards want to avoid that ruling at all costs.
The 2nd Amendment was written as a protection for the citizens against a Tyrannical Government, and the potential Tyrannical Government are the ones who get to regulate that protection. It's a bad joke. It's become such a joke that when this is brought up to Democrat Politicians openly in congressional sessions the Politicians actually Laugh out loud at the idea of the people using their Firearms to Defend itself against a Tyrannical overreacting government. Jerry Nadler has laughed about it and Joe Biden did it too.
If I'm wrong about these things, then help me understand why 1 Constitutional right is constantly gutted and chipped away at by the Democrat Politicians, but no other Amendments are never toyed with.
Thanks again for your information
ОтветитьIt’s about time this attack on the Constitution gets stopped! OMG!
ОтветитьLove your videos
ОтветитьI certainly hope we aren’t pinning all of our hopes on the Oregon State Supreme Court
ОтветитьInterest balancing test are not a valid test, ever
ОтветитьThank you for covering Oregon
Ответитьwashington?
ОтветитьJustice ? I don't think so, delay delay delay, argue argue argue. Up the chain down the chain
Really their is no justice in this country. Not even the illusion any more. How does any one sit & listen to this dribble & not laugh out loud.
The fact we can’t get 2011’s in California, proper rifle setups, and more is stupid.
Ответить