Комментарии:
Woke America: Accountability? Answer: Democrats: "We just don't identify with that." Vote Democrat.
ОтветитьThis spoiled brat is crying for herself not for her friends she murdered. This is why you discipline your kids. I'm sure she was spoiled and allowed to do whatever she wanted without consequences.
ОтветитьHer reaction IS her repentance. By Gods law, it is actually illegally to punish a repentful person who made a mistake.
Thats from the final revelation which has been protected from tampering . Forgiveness and repentance are actual laws not just lip service. It prevents crime in the long term.
Shes hardly an adult.
ОтветитьDont understand how a driver is a murderer? She planned it? Bizarre. Accidents happen all the time.
Decades ago ...nobody got charged- an accident was just that or they were charged involuntary something or other. These days you just snezze and theres a cop on your back.
She is crying for thinking about herself, not about the murder she did.
ОтветитьDo the crime You do the time…bye
ОтветитьAlways remember a car is a lethal weapon in the wrong hands.
ОтветитьCANT THEY LET HER GO ? CMON !
ОтветитьShes cute. It's a damn shame. She easily could've gotten a new group of friends + a new BF the same day of the break up.. Ego and pride makes you blind for sure.
ОтветитьI want this type of strict laws in my country also there are many prosperous parents who provide bike & cars to their teenagers...who are doing rash drivings without any fear because they and there parents knows the laws regarding rash drivings are so flexible that anyone can easily escape from any charges😢
Ответитьactions ripple through time … that’s deep … wonder if she truly believes that, and votes and advocates towards society that way
Ответить👋 👋 Bye
ОтветитьHow disgusting that she feels so sorry for herself
ОтветитьBoo hoo. ✌🏽
ОтветитьFamily and Daugther are both pure evil. 2 lives lost for no reason.
ОтветитьThis may notbe a popular comment but, there could be another side to this coin. If she suffers from severe depression (or bipolar depression), she could have had a moment of mania. Her decision seemed to happen in a split second. She may not have had time to even think about what she was doing. I only say this because it's happened to me personally. I never hurt anyone else (Thank God!) but, it could have under different circumstances. She will have survivors guilt for the rest of her life. I do understand that somebody has to pay and, I'll be this young girl.
ОтветитьJUDGE finds??!!! !!!!
ОтветитьHete to see them go but love to see them leave
Ответитьi was watching Mackenzie's lawyer the whole time, man that guy must have a really bad day at the office loosing all it counts. Not good for his career.
Ответитьshe'll be out in 7
ОтветитьSo i can doing. this
I am full of Fear
But so you realy do this
With high Speed..
I can't understand
For Love
ОтветитьIn civilized countries kids don t get sentenced to life in prison
ОтветитьThe only one i can See...
You will KILLING your Self...
Shirilla you be never a Murder...
ОтветитьThe Words to take..
She is a Murder
Bullshit Bullshit Bullshit all over
ОтветитьI don't believe she is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of this crime. Days before the incident, she or they could have been scouting a location for a potential break-in. This would explain the tools the third person in the vehicle and why they were heading to a remote location early in the morning.
The make and model of the vehicle they were in is known for a delayed throttle, which can lead drivers to apply excessive pressure to the gas pedal when trying to accelerate. This issue has even further led to sudden or spontaneous unintended acceleration (SUA)as per the class action lawsuits. This was attributed to interference with the gas pedal by ill fitting floor mats. This was resolved making the mats smaller and by adding hooks to keep it in place. While there could be arguments about whether she had an aftermarket floor mat or didn't properly secure her mat perhaps after cleaning the vehicle I believe the more likely scenario is that her slipper interfered with the pedal and lodge between it and the floor forcing it to accelerate at full throttle. This theory is based upon the the first responder who noted that her 'slipper' was still stuck to the pedal or in whatever manner they described it to me could also mean lodged.
In my opinion, other aspects, such as character witnesses, previous statements, and fights, appear to be hearsay and circumstantial and should not have been decisive factors in the verdict. These accounts could be swayed and perceived differently based on emotions. Unfortunately, they opted for a trial by judge who appeared biased and unprofessional, possibly seeking notoriety herself by coining the phrase hell on wheels. I also believe her lawyer did not adequately defend her, first by suggesting a trial by judge (if I was a juror outcome would have been different) and second by failing to provide a reasonable explanation to justify her actions that day
What do the Justice?
They Looking ....Social Media
This was her end.
ОтветитьI believe she is not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of this crime. Days before the incident, she or they were scouting a location for a potential break-in. This would explain the tools the third person in the vehicle and why they were heading to a remote location early in the morning.
The make and model of the vehicle they were in is known for a delayed throttle, which can lead drivers to apply excessive pressure to the gas pedal when trying to accelerate. This issue has even further led to sudden or spontaneous unintended acceleration (SUA)as per the class action lawsuits. This was attributed to interference with the gas pedal by ill fitting floor mats. This was resolved making the mats smaller and by adding hooks to keep it in place. While there could be arguments about whether she had an aftermarket floor mat or didn't properly secure her mat perhaps after cleaning the vehicle I believe the more likely scenario is that her slipper interfered with the pedal and lodge between it and the floor forcing it to accelerate at full throttle. This theory is based upon the the first responder who noted that her 'slipper' was still stuck to the pedal or in whatever manner they described it to me could also mean lodged.
In my opinion, other aspects, such as character witnesses, previous statements, and fights, appear to be hearsay and circumstantial and should not have been decisive factors in the verdict. These accounts could be swayed and perceived differently based on emotions. Unfortunately, they opted for a trial by judge who appeared biased and unprofessional, possibly seeking notoriety herself by coining the phrase hell on wheels. I also believe her lawyer did not adequately defend her, first by suggesting a trial by judge (if I was a juror outcome would have been different) and second by failing to provide a reasonable explanation to justify her actions that day.
Sad story but nice to see women being held accountable
ОтветитьFOLKS! Dont you miss her? It has been a month
ОтветитьIn response to all of the evidence that was presented, the Defendant deserves the guilty verdict and deserves to spend the rest of her life in prison. A senseless act of violence. She wanted those two boys dead and she executed her mission with precision and purpose.
ОтветитьThe defendant "chose" to commit murder...
ОтветитьGuilty on all counts…..do better parents!
Ответитьcongratulations girly 💅🏼
you thought there’s no accountability for women?
Wow I nee this girl back in my 2010 before she moved to stringtown, she went to indian springs elementary with me but as anyone, I do not condone her action and believe the sentence was fair
ОтветитьShe has the face of pure evil
ОтветитьIf I'm innocent I'm not staying quiet listening to this. So sorry for them all except the guilty 💔
ОтветитьI started dating.... turned out she was toxic.
I told her to fuck off, DElate my number and don't come back.
What I didn't do was do that.
Good! Go rot in prison as you deserve.
ОтветитьA bench trial is the better choice only when you are innocent.
Ответитьno tears!
ОтветитьDon't cry now! You weren't crying when you killed someone!
Ответитьthe act is inexcusable. But. Young people over the age of 17, who are often still unstable, should not receive a drive "ticket". Who in the state had the irresponsible idea of allowing children to drive? Not allowing it before 20 years would be more responsible "worldwide".
Ответитьso what have we learned today? Do not murder people...
Ответить"Game over."
- Jigsaw
🍥🐷🍥
What gets me Is the judge "Telling her, her thoughts of a mind she didn't can't read" that really pstsssssses me off...
I moan in my Own quarters.
My mother sometimes is a wind up ..
I'm more than pre informed or know my shit..
It's not my misdemeanor.