What Are The Hidden Rules Of The Universe?

THERE IS NO OTHER LIFE ON THE OTHER PLANET! Did you don't know for what this theory is used? To see what is differend on other planet and what is simmilar. How to do this? Which parameters choose. Best is to look on life like ours on other planet, but what is life? Maybe on other planet is other life? Other rules. This is only for this. And another things like: how you code left and right-is simple to draw with oposite vectors and name it, but how you will code left and right in signal? How do you know 3 signals is right and 6 is left? Maybe is up and down? You need a language to encode it..but light is a signal, so how light knows where and how must fly? Maybe there is no particules but it is stages. If you can coloured signals you can code more infos. Left could be violet and right red. Red could be more yellow, violet, so more left or right, but where is up and down than? Violet could be more dark with black and yellow more light with white. It could be up and down. What is green than, or red?
Is a mix. Green is more yellow and red too. Orange is red with white and yellow, but red includes some violet when is more dark. Green can be yellow with blue.
2 opposites. We have warm and cold colours. More warm is more yellow and red. Cold is more blue and violet. If we can send coloured signal to UFO we can code more, but radio signal is only signal, beep or not beeping. 0-1.
Is too simple to code left and right. We need better machines which can send a colour like in photography.
1st photos was only black-white. What change that we have colored now? Tape and curve optic things which can curve light. Prism curve concentrated light which is white. Air is a tape.
Tape have some chemicals. How they catch light? How gas get colours like argon? It gets electric charge. What when electrones or photones is a prism? Sodium gives more orange, yellow light. Which colours are faster? What is diference of potentials between theme? Between air particules? Why colours get invisible in the way whether they are white light? They can't decide about stage so have none? Maybe they need hydrogen ions to arise colours or O3? Do the clouds including CO2 or it is only close to Earth? Which magnetic bonds or fields, forces creates CO2? Push C and O to bond
By electrolize water we can separate chlorine. Water is in the air. After storm we can se all colours sometimes. Storm locally electrolize water drops in air. Plasma have a colours. What storm is doing to water? Why we get O3? Nobody get this reaction in lab. So how do we know anything when we don't know basics? Let's try think simple and create our own system. We have colours, they can be more left and white. They have speed. More speed is more hot. More density get more fast particules, but they isn't
particules it's stages. Light is fast and cold because is not burning. Light is including all colours, warm and cold. Weak and strong what is it in simple meaning? Is how much force. Let's say more speed stronger force but density slows. Mass is density, but density is speed, so mass could be a speed but in every directions which creates pressure. We need some borders to create pressure. How we construct this? With opposites potentials, oposite mirror forces. Weak and strong. Strong habe more density so more concentrated forces. Ok but how we explain colours on this system? More red will have more spin, more moves? Balance of forces will get white. But why light can be cold? Smthng with high speed. High speed but no density. No mass. Only directed energy. Which boundariees creates no density? No any borders. It means not directed forces which in this system means mass but without pressure. Energy is like mass without bonds and borders? Pure motion, speed.
If speed is energy what is mass than? Energy is like force without power untill it meet some conditions. Energy creates moves of electrones. I know this is not so simple but let's try to think a bit about reasons and simple bonds. Is smthng could be hot and cold? Warm. Kind of balance, mix which creates weak forces. How many combinations we can get from this simple system?

Love those videos

Well it was good for a laugh for a minute and a have before it got utterly pathetic.

This quotation, “In the beginning was the word …” is not from Genesis but from the gospel of John, 1:1. Genesis 1:1 begins “In the beginning god created …”. Sorry that I happen to know this, and sorry that I have so correct you, but so it is.

Ahh that’s what cp means… lol

FRACTAL....look at the small neurons and electrical impulses in the brain then look at the massive expansive universe. The same looking.

When it comes to particle physics, I'm not even in my wheelhouse, but it seems to me that determining the nature of the universe by blasting particles at each other in super-energetic collisions is akin to trying to figure out how an automobile works by looking at the wreckage left after a major crash.

Shake and Bake is next

I hate your channel

You know, Futurama wasn't far off 🤔

❤

Honestly i think a Theory of Most is the best science can hope for. What if a theory of everything just doesnt exist. Incompleteness being what it is 😂

That opening "story" is utterly stupid.

If there is another species out there, they are not similar to human type. Don't worry about them..

I don't think the universe has any rules or laws.

I love listening to the soothing, instructive, super interesting, educational, and on and on, etc. if only other channels weren’t trying to cut corners using AI, and instead focus on something well within their reach: voice modulation.

Imagine a time where all the problems of humanity have been solved and we leave the planet behind to explore the galaxy’s? Well, that’s a tall order! Since at this point in time, I don’t think anyone can even begin to imagine such a thing. lol But, it’s a nice thought. Anyone have an idea where to go? How about the Andromeda Galaxy? It’s only 2 1/2 million light years away. Just a hop, skip, and jump away. See ya there!

It’s interesting to note that the principle of least action allows, for example, the conservation of energy. Which seems all so practical and natural. Since even people like to find the easiest way to do things. But at the quantum level, I believe, this doesn’t seem to be. Since there appears to be a kind of randomness to particle behavior. While maintaining a probability of outcomes. So where does the principle of least action apply? Or, does the answer lie in the question? Because quantum fluctuations tells you there can’t be such a thing? Or, there is conservation of energy; but it applies differently?

"Why did the universe freeze?" It has never been frozen and it will never freeze. The laws of thermodynamics prevents this from being true. It says that energy can't be created or destroyed, meaning the universe had no beginning or end. It always has been and always will be. There will be no heat death of the universe. If the universe has a beginning or an end, the laws of thermodynamics are wrong. I'm betting that the laws of thermodynamics are right and that we live in a finite universe. The universe isn't infinite in shape or form or topology. Space is not flat, it is slightly curved. This slight curvature means that the universe is immensely large, seemingly infinite, but the curvature means that it either loops back in on itself or it wraps around inversely on the outside of itself. The universe has no beginning, and it has no end, as it is most likely an infinite cycle of different configurations of all its content. You see, although energy can't be created or destroyed, it can be transformed. It always transforms. There is always change. This is what I mean when I say that the universe has never been frozen and that it will never freeze.

Most likely, the universe is a closed system, where energy is attracted from a not so dense state to a more dense state due to variations of density in space itself. Dense regions of space, lets say a fold in space, where the structure of space curves more than in other places - those regions attracts particles (read: energy, as all matter is energy) and form great attractors that galaxies are drawn to. A black hole could literally be a fold in space, as it "consumes" even light. However, there could be another reason why light vanishes, and that is because it might fold beyond the horizon of space, and bend into the fold of the black hole. Imagine that the black hole is more like a sink, and inside the sink, there is a spiraling funnel, which grinds everything that enters it like a garburator and spews out Hawking radiation. Radiation is energy in the form of frequencies, so this process is not unthinkable.

In any case. It's a theory I'm working on, but it's all speculative at the moment. However, everything I have said is either true (established by current physics) or highly probable, and it's not anywhere more far-fetched than the Big Bang theory. That theory only has a popular consensus, and everything about it isn't proven to be true. Yes, it says that our universe expands and that it accelerates, but that doesn't mean it has a beginning or an end. That just means it expands uniformly and that it happens everywhere around us, but the universe is so large that we can't see more than a fraction of the universe itself. We can't see it's end, because the universe expands faster than the light we see, and we can't see the beginning, because theoretically everything would have to compact into a singularity, which is highly unlikely. Why? Because all physics breaks down at the size of a singularity. Either singularities are wrong or all laws of physics are wrong. I'm betting there are no singularities. Infinite expansion is theoretically possible, but infinite density is not probable. We can only see a bubble around us, which is how far light has traveled since "the beginning of time", which is another speculative term. What is the beginning of time? Well, the universe would have to be frozen for there to be a beginning of time, because time is only a measurement of moving objects through space. It isn't its own dimension. It is an emergent property of space. If everything in the universe stood still and if the universe didn't expand or move, then everything would be frozen, and there would be no time. So when everything started to move, that would be the beginning of time. However, that would break the laws of thermodynamics like I said in the beginning, and the laws of thermodynamics is a fundamental aspect of the Standard Model, which The Big Bang therory is also a part of. So, either the laws of thermodynamics are wrong, the Standard Model is wrong or the Big Bang theory is wrong. They can't all be right, because they all contradict eachother.

In any case, I don't even know why I'm writing all of this, because in all likeliness nobody will read it.

One civilization made of matter and the other of antimatter... What in the interstellar Romeo and Juliet... 🤯

Hogwash

Ah the path of least resistance... Is far from laziness. Miss Labels meeting Mrs Wright

"In the begining there was Nothing"......"God is in the Electron"..Extrapolate!..!. 🔬👍☁🌧🌩⛈⛅☀😎🌞⚡

VERITASIUM just ripped this video off.

Really in the whole entire Milky Way. we didn't find any other life?

It is prudent to assume that we do not know all of them yet, nor may we ever (given infinity and eternity)...

What the fuck have I been listening to for the last half an hour like I have no clue how any sort of recommendation got me here this ain’t my rodeo


Edit: ahh you know what it’s the SCP videos I’ve been watching I bet

The "action" theory seems to suggest time and space are not connected, as one can arrive quicker to ones destination in less time by taking a longer path.

They used horizontally flipped pictures of Wu.......get it?

How are the fascist of the other civilization called?

And how are the antifas of the other civilization called?

Anti antifas? Or simply fascist

The whole premise of your scenario is flawed at the outset. The antimatter signals received will be destroyed before decoded by matter receivers.

English is not my natural language an dI not even a scientist but I find your work here really amazing. Bravo!

Why brag about sleeping to these videos.....i watch them wide awake!

This format of education is very story-like, in fact, it's almost melodic. I love it.

Very well done! Thanks. Learned much and really appreciate that it’s relatively free ✌️

Loved it. Learned a lot.

Idiot doesn’t know about Hindu Temples that show all kinds of symmetry. If Thais is ignorance it can be forgiven and education imparted however if its case of racism and bigotry then there is no cure not even hod can help.

Hi

Anki

I love this S**t 👍

Thanks for my sleepless nights 😂

A little more conservation, a little less action!

Just a passing thought, would it not be the case that by simply shining a light at the other guy, your matter-based photons would come in contact with their anti-matter based eyeballs and immediately make their head explode? Again, just a passing though. And yes I know, as a huge fan of science fiction myself, that one must often times suspend science for the sake of story. I get it and please do not misconstrue this comment as a hater throwing shade. Just a passing thought to possibly stimulate a bit of conversation on this specific aspect of the matter/anti matter problem.

Do not, I repeat, DO NOT conserve CP.

This Content is Unreal and so far from Science !!

It sounds like you're expressing a deep philosophical objection to space exploration framed in visceral, confrontational terms. Let me try to understand and reframe the core concerns you're raising:

1. *Cultural Sanctity* - celestial bodies hold sacred meaning that's violated by human interference
2. *Environmental Ethics* - That space debris represents an irreversible contamination of the cosmos
3. *Technological Overreach* - That human innovation is arrogantly overstepping natural boundaries
4. *Legal Accountability* - That existing power structures need to enforce consequences

Rather than the aggressive tone (which may undermine your message), you might consider framing this as:

*"A Declaration of Cosmic Rights"*
Proposing that celestial bodies deserve:
- Protection from human contamination
- Recognition as sacred entities in international law
- Moratoriums on exploration until ethical frameworks exist

This approach could gain more traction with UNESCO and space governance bodies. The Outer Space Treaty already establishes some of these principles - your argument could strengthen enforcement mechanisms.

Would you like help developing:
1) A more formal philosophical manifesto?
2) Specific legal/policy proposals?
3) Cultural preservation strategies?

The passion behind your message is clear - the challenge is channeling it into structures that can actually create change. I'm happy to help craft whichever approach you think would be most effective.

You're scaring me

If these people want half the people alive to be dead why's there four of them? Why don't they start with themselves? It's cos they're all talk. None of them would volunteer for it themselves. They're confused mad people who have become convinced that they have fantastical intellect and yet all sound like pol pot. Or Mao or stalin...