The Camera That Will Change Photography Forever

Don't take this personally but your images are very average. Now that almost all cameras over, the price of $1,500 are very good, the difference in the photo is in the eye and skill of the person behind the lens, not the tech. When a golf hacker buys the state of the art Driver, it doesn't improve his score, it just results in the ball going 20 yards deeper into the forest.

Chili Pepper Sauce was the most interesting thing in this video.

Wow. I now know a lot about something I didn’t need to know about. Thanks.

Nope we need more dials and less touchscreens , have the canon r7 who has a full use touchscreen and its a pain compared to a fuji xt-5 and its 3 most important dials , should have given that one the cache and capabilities of the h-2 and ergonomics of the xt.

Digital sucks.

I wish there was a camera like a box with just a full touchscreen on back. Like a point and shoot with no viewfinder. But if you put it up to your eye a viewfinder will appear in the touchscreen,

I foresee a future were shutter speed is completely different. I’d imagine that what you would do is set a maximum shutter time then the images that would be produced rather than being a single image would have a time axis. This would enable you to re adjust your shutter speed in post and even find the best start and end time of the shutter. Of course this is likely many years off as this would use an insane amount of compute and storage.

I really hate video titles that contain "change forever", "change everything" etc. It is NEVER true. Global shutter is very interesting and cool, but the vast majority of photographs would be UNCHANGED by the addition of a global shutter to the camera. Just talk about the camera without the click-bait hyperbole ... ok?

I have only 1 question: Where can I find that exact blue Apple Watch band, maybe provide a link or brand name. Great video too

I use monitor+

120FPS might be good for like... creative slow motion "stop animation" style photography? Instead of shooting ALL-I video or something? Idunno :S

Ccd cell with flourescent pixel on third layer can transfer to led screen then go back to ram to buffer then to memory then enscryp from memory goes back to mrmory

Ahhh so this is why I’m seeing $2000 dslrs for 200-400 bucks.

No need for nd filters from now on!

Great video. I wish I would have seen it a week ago. I've been playing with mine for 4 days almost nonstop and still can't figure out how to save Bracket settings in Memory Recall. The "*" setting on the drive mode dial make's it confusing, but I have to admit I haven't used "Memory Recall" that much. Can you even store these settings. Sony use to provide a decent user manual with their cameras. Now it's just an online "Help Guide' that seems vague. I bought it based on all the hype I heard preproduction last year. Big mistake!!! Oh yeah, I agree, the app sucks.

Not so great -Global shutters expose all the photosites of a sensor simultaneously, which can result in a reduced dynamic range compared to rolling shutter sensors. Dynamic range is the range boundaries or luminous intensity range when taking a picture. A wide dynamic range means the final image will more accurately depict the situation in real life, even under intense illumination

Yea I have been waiting for you to review this

nice presentation

is this camera good for pro videos ?

No, we need more physical buttons. It's near impossible to find colour temperature in the menu within reasonable time.

This will not change photography , but A I will do. Canon/Sony should worry now.

This might be the most legit review and explanation ive ever seen.

Thank you, I wonder if there‘s a way to connect the camera through a usb-c cable to an iphone 15

Guess what .......... you still have press that button at the right time..

Great video, great review!

So you're a professional photographer that can't justify a $6000 tool, but I wonder how much you spend on the car to get you to your shoots, or what your average vacation costs?

Please consider adding a strobe warning. Day ender.😵‍💫🤢🙈

Do you think we might see the Alpha 9iii sensor in a camcorder?

Nice, to the point. For me 24 mp is not good, and dynamic range is ok but but not top, today my first choice is the a1, i’m waiting for the a1 mark 2. But this is my personal view basis the way i’m using my camera. But one day global shutter will be the standard.

Hobbyist discovers shutter.

as a newsshooter i see this camera pretty obsolete

I had a Minolta film camera in the 1990's that could flash sync at all speeds up to 1/8000 sec, the 700si, as I recall the flash guns were the 3500XI and 5400HS.
It was very very useful for bright Sunlit wedding shots to fill in the harsh shadows, fine tuned it was a great look.

So, there are a number of shooting scenarios for wgich this camera is optimal:
1) You really need 120fps (sports?)
2) You like to shoot portraits in mid sun outside wide open f1.2 at 1/80.000th (darken the sun at noon) and use a simple 200ws flash in a big softbox to achieve this
3) You are constantly shooting inside with crappy ambient LEDs formerly having caused banding in your images
I would like to do 2+3 but I am not really sure this make sense from a business perspective. At the moment, I do not get extra clients or lose existing clients because I am working my A9II cameras a bit harder (doing a bit of high-flash sync outside and messing with finding an appropriate shutter speed to reduce banding in these ugly-light venues)

It's Sony, so it most certainly is not professional.

Apart from that, the significance of this technical improvement to actual photography is near-zero.

The close to hysterical talking about this improvement is completely unwarranted.

ok, this time, the clickbait title is justified.
Really impressed by the content and the way you shared it

I was baited by thr title. Tuned in but didn't understand jack sht. So is this better or not?

It is not TRUE that electronic shutters traditionally read one line at a time. Most actually has the ability to read multiple lines at the same time. They simply cannot read ALL LINES AT ONCE. In fact, that is why electronic shutters can achieve frame rates that are almost as fast as that of mechanical shutters even though the read time for the entire sensor is MUCH SLOWER than the speed of the mechanical shutter. A good mechanical shutter with a flash sync speed of 1/250 has an travel speed of about 4 ms; even a very ordinary one with a 1/125 sync speed is about 8 ms. An A7RV e-shutter is about 60 ms while the lower res A7IV is about half that at just under 30 ms. In spite of that, the electronic shutter allows you to shoot at frame rates quite close to the mechanical shutter. How can a e-shutter that takes 60ms to read from the first to the last line shoot at 7~8 fps when the 4ms mechanical shutter "only" does 10 fps? The reset time of the mechanical device accounts for at least doubling the continuous shooting speed of the shutter. But, it still doesn't add up. The answer is that the e-shutter can start reading another line before the previous read reaches the last line like a moving Zebra curtain. Yes, sometimes it can start reading the 1st line a 2nd time when the the previous frame is only say 20% down the sensor.

It doesn't change photography too much. Rolling shutter IS NOT AN ISSUE for most people in the overwhelming scenarios under which they take photographs or make videos. It only becomes a problem when you need to get above the flash sync speed of a mechanical shutter or electronic front curtain shutter, and ONLY when you are shooting something that moves very fast. Most people don't need to shoot fast enough frame rate or with a short enough exposure time 99.9% of the time. It only matters to sports and action photographers seeking very fast frame rates or video gays needing to go fully electronic while panning very quickly. That is a very small minority of all the photos and videos taken by mankind.

interesting tech. hopefully it will filter down to more affordable models so normal joe poor public can buy one. once smart phones are banned of course

6 GRAND jesus, here i thought my $2600 r6ii was hot shit lol

Tech for tech's sake. Total waste IMO.

Could you talk about what the price of your camera should be? As a professional photographer, it would seem like 6k for your main camera wouldn't be too expensive. Or is it that it's not the right fit? What camera do you use and price?

And marketing brainwashed people will still think their phones are better without knowing a thing about photography.

Hope they’ll make an α7s IV with global shatter

Man, I hope in the future this technology will be available in medium format cameras.

The Nikon Z9 is the first no mechanical shutter mirrorless camera. That is 2 year old fact.

This changes everything!?

Oh no!!!

Will I no longer like pepperoni pizza???!!! It's my favorite!

Using the terms global sensor and global shutter interchangeably and inconsistently is very confusing for most people.

A sensor is a sensor and a shutter is a shutter. This camera is shutteeless. In the very first seconds there's a term displayed "global shutter sensor".
I could live with that because at least it's different than global shutter.