History of Space Exploration 4K | Ancient Astronomy | The World Of Science

You are doing a great job kind sir! Unlike other Indian pseudo-science clickbait channels, you provide authentic information. You have my full trust and love. Best wishes to you. JAI HIND!

🌌

The main driving force behind space exploration was the space race between the USSR and the USA. Let's look at her results.

Rating of countries by the first launches of artificial Earth satellites:

1. USSR - 1957
2. USA - 1958
3. UK - 1962
4. Canada - 1962
5. Italy - 1964

Rating of countries by the first launches of space satellites with their own launch vehicles:

1. USSR - October 4, 1957
2. USA - February 1, 1958
3. France - November 26, 1965
4. Italy - April 26, 1967
5. Japan - February 11, 1970

Rating of countries by the first flights of astronauts:

1. USSR - April 12, 1961
2. USA - May 5, 1961
3. Czechoslovakia - March 2, 1978
4. Poland - June 27, 1978
5. GDR - 26 August 1978

Ranking of countries by the number of first-of-its-kind spacecraft (remarkable, of historical significance, with achievements that were made for the first time by one of the countries) until 1992:

1. USSR - 21
2. USA - 15
3. EU - 1

Ranking of countries by the number of spacecraft launched to explore the solar system, as well as first-of-its-kind or noteworthy vehicles launched into low Earth orbit before 1992:

1. USSR - 115
2. USA - 84
3. EU - 4
4. Japan - 4
5. Germany - 2

Ranking of countries by the number of successful orbital launches (not including emergency and partially emergency) until 1992:

1. USSR - 2278
2. USA - 903
3. Japan - 42
4. France - 39
5. China - 27

Ranking of countries by the lowest proportion of emergency orbital launches for countries with more than 10 launches before 1992:

1. USSR - 5.54%
2. EU - 7.14%
3. USA - 11.25%
4. Japan - 12.24%
5. France - 14.89%


As you can see, in all the above ratings, the USSR took first place. The United States achieved the landing of a man on the moon, so I will dwell on this in more detail.

A manned flight to the moon was not practical. In view of the fact that the USA lost to the USSR all the events of the race in space and had hopeless chances of winning when competing with the USSR in those places that had practical expediency, the Americans decided to deliver a man to the moon, due to the fact that the USSR was not going to send a man to the moon ( Of the given hopeless chances of winning in rivalry with the USSR and a great chance to beat the Soviets in the implementation of the first landing of the crew on the moon, Wernher von Braun wrote in a note to Vice President L. Johnson, in which he tried to answer the questions posed by President Kennedy in a memorandum dated April 20, 1961). For a man to fly to the moon, a tenfold jump in carrier power was needed compared to the rockets existing at that time, and for the reason that the USSR did not plan to fly to the moon, the USSR did not have such a rocket, and he did not try to develop it. But due to large financial expenses and due to the lack of practical expediency, the US leadership refused to finance the delivery of a man to the moon.

For example, this is what the head of the task force, Donald Horniga, wrote about this in his conclusion when analyzing NASA's plan for the Apollo program: “Emotional arguments and national ambition are put in the rationale for manned programs. This is not a subject that can be discussed from an engineering standpoint.”

US President Eisenhower found the requested spending to be beyond reasonable. On December 20, 1960, the issue was considered at a meeting of the US National Security Council. Eisenhower's reaction was indifferent: "I don't care if man of the moon. Someone compared the situation to the one when the Spanish monarchy decided to finance the expensive expedition of Christopher Columbus, who discovered America as a result. Eisenhower, recalling the method used by King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella, replied that he "is not going to pawn his jewels to send a man to the moon."

But with the change of the President of the United States, the situation has changed. On May 25, 1961, American President John F. Kennedy delivered a speech to Congress in which he proclaimed the goal for the United States to carry out space flight with an astronaut landing on the surface of the Moon before the end of the decade. To this, former President Dwight Eisenhower wrote in the widely read Sunday Evening Post that "the race to the moon, the inevitable spending of huge sums and the increase in public debt is the wrong way."

But despite this, the Apollo program was adopted in 1961. Kennedy was able to convince Kennedy to accept this program by a consultant from his campaign headquarters, Richard Neustadt, writing in a note that the Apollo program, or rather, its key and most expensive part of it - the projected Saturn rocket, is a project of prestige, and that the United States is lagging behind the USSR and, most likely, will be left behind in rivalry with the USSR, therefore, it is necessary to withdraw from the race and redirect resources to getting a man to the moon.

On October 26, 1963, N. S. Khrushchev, answering journalists' questions, said that the Soviet Union did not plan to send a man to the moon. At that time, Korolev had a multi-launch scheme that involved assembling a lunar spacecraft in near-Earth orbit from separately launched modules. But it was not approved at the government level and therefore was not funded. Also, even before the launch of the lunar flight and lunar landing programs in the USSR, technical proposals were developed for the creation of a manned lunar orbital station L4.

The main initiator of the idea of manned flight to the Moon and even to Mars was Sergei Pavlovich Korolev.

But Korolev's views on the need for manned space exploration were opposed by the view of G. N. Babakin that only the exploration of outer space by robots would give real and quick benefits to mankind. And the decisive word in this rivalry was for V. Chelomey, who, being one of the key creators of the USSR nuclear missile shield and the head of the second of the main organizations for the creation of space technology (including manned), considered Babakin's view as more promising. Chelomey was the direct superior of Sergei Khrushchev, who was his deputy and was the son of N. S. Khrushchev. But after the removal of N. S. Khrushchev from power, Chelomey fell into disgrace, which gave Korolev the opportunity to implement his ideas. Therefore, only a few years later, with a great delay in relation to the United States, on August 3, 1964, the lunar manned program of the USSR was approved by a government decree.

Korolev originally planned a flight to Mars as more valuable than a flight to the Moon, but due to the launch of the US lunar program and the complex technical implementation "Martian" version, the project was revised towards the Moon.

But even further, Korolev ran into problems due to the fact that many did not share his idea of flying to the moon. The most experienced space propulsion design bureau Glushko refused to make powerful engines for spacecraft necessary for flight to the moon. Glushko was a principled opponent of flights to the Moon and advocated the creation of orbital near-Earth stations for defense purposes. Also, experienced Gosplan economists, with whom Korolev usually consulted, warned that the real figures for the necessary costs through the Ministry of Finance and the State Planning Commission will not be approved. Pashkov, highly knowledgeable in the politics of the State Planning Commission, advised to underestimate real costs, and in the future we will issue more than one decree, hardly anyone dares close the work of such a scale and then the money will be found! Therefore, the calculations that were submitted to the Central Committee and the Council of Ministers were underestimated. And when it came to allocating the necessary funds for it, the leaders of the country demanded that the designers observe the regime
savings, and this only led to "raw" design solutions and a sharp decrease reliability of new space technology.

On January 14, 1966, Sergei Korolev dies during a medical operation. Further, in view of the fact that there were no more such supporters of the flight to the moon as Korolev, after the appointment of Glushko as the head and chief designer of NPO Energia, he closed the lunar program.


As you can see, landing a man on the moon had no practical significance, so the governments of the countries refused to allocate money for this. But when the leadership changed, this problem was resolved. The lack of practical significance led to the fact that the lunar program of the USSR was adopted much later than the United States. Even despite the fact that the lunar program was approved in the USSR, there were still frictions within the USSR between Korolev (a supporter of flights to the moon) and those who believed that sending a man to the moon was economically unreasonable and pointless, which hindered this goal. Before the Americans reached the moon, Korolyov died, and later his opponents of a manned flight to the moon closed the lunar program of the USSR. The US put a man on the moon. Unlike the USSR, the US had a motive to reach the moon. They were served by the fact that the Americans had previously lost to the USSR all phases of the space race and thus wanted to rehabilitate themselves. But it was much more economically feasible to send interplanetary spacecraft to the Moon, which the USSR did. The USSR was already on the moon 10 years before the US landed a man on it.

In general, looking at the above facts, we can say that the space race was won by the USSR, and the USA won the lunar race.

Incompleta

(OO)+* If one is truly proud of their race religion gender sexual preference social classification personal professional life. Then the do their best to live in accordance to validate such a belief. You know what's worse than living through pain. Being spiritually held back. By one's ancient descendents everyday poor choices. Example wearing makeup beauty supplies clothing so forth and so on that is made to the lowest standards of quality which contain substances materials that stem from poisonous chemicals that never change their killing composition. Which means whether it is a solid liquid burnt off into our airways atmosphere as a vapor is always going to be poisonous debilitating deadly to the body at the same time polluting corrupting devastating to mother Earth and all the various different forms of life that live within this world. Another example being soft lazy out of shape overfed under nourished overworked underpaid weakling with a dirty low-paying job. Basically neglecting one's own physical freedom throughout their life. In other words no one can express receive love or any other desired emotion in its entirety if the don't know themselves from the inside out. So learn your body's capabilities and limitations by fully engaging with all the body senses to their extreme limits in the most efficient way that is humanly possible. Become physically fit mentally sound spiritually balanced being able to express physical freedom which is key for one to start living up to the pleasure potential responsibility of femininity and masculinity. For only at this level of body awareness does one actually naturally constantly consistently have the self-control discipline loyalty devotion appreciation respect confidence playful determination. To consciously acknowledge physically participate in being true towards love honor and the creation of life in the way of being a mother or father parent possible Guardian caretaker. This greatest most pleasurable of all responsibilities would also instinctively include a method of parenting upbringing that would quantify the chances of infant baby newborn toddler young child teenager growing developing maturing into a strong confident healthy successful fun loving intellectual adult that can joyfully make their way through life as a (single married) leading or simply just being a healthy happy productive part of a massive group which is society. Option number two alone not quite as exciting physically mentally spiritually challenging rewarding nonetheless a quantum leap in progress from the way the mass majority of the population throughout the history of mankind has been living dying off lacking more so here in America. More specifically Donald Trump and like minded. Is to have had the wisdom and knowledge physical capabilities of being able to ground in pound slip and grip into paradise so intensely intimately that it gets the soul and spirit off with no negativity attached maybe even in the free and clear. Possible for a person to be a combination of all these best case scenarios situation combined is one. Unfortunately the mass majority of today's population from coast to coast globally again more desperate here in America are content living dying off having only used the smallest percentage of a fraction of the true potential they were first born with. I must say being feebleminded physically inadequate submissive subservient may be genetically inherited or a simple generic synthetic learned behavior nowadays a possible side effect from global pollution. Most likely for today's population again more so here in America even more specifically Donald Trump and his sellout suck up traitor to America trumpet blowers to be a combination of all those worst-case scenarios combined is one. Which also includes being a sexual failure sexual criminal. Keep in mind sexual crimes are classified as the weakest form of criminal conduct. Which is one of my primary points everything sissy boys supreme does permeates out weakness. Subconsciously he knows this. Is part of the reason why he and Mitch McConnell the Republican Party for the last 60 years. Have had the false belief if the mass majority of the population is at their worst. They will look their best and feel less afraid scared of dominant gentleman and women that are demonstrating high-class sophistication which is a form of femininity at its finest. and these points should be instinctively in heart considering the simple logic basic concept that if life is not free why the hell would death be any cheaper? It's not guaranteed. A question the common basic average normal man or woman may be able to wonder is the spiritual cost to one's own soul and spirit when the freely live and die off having only used the smallest percentage of a fraction of the true potential they were first born with basically overlooking their own physical freedom throughout their life. Unfortunately this self-neglect reckless desperate ignorant stupidity has been exacerbated by global pollution. The good news similar to life not being free I promise souls and spirits have paid out are picking up the tab on all these man-made problems and much more. Now I would like to resurrect THE wish and prayer are made prior to my 8th birthday which was that I wished and prayed to be held spiritually accountable to the statements I proclaim to the way I'm living personally professionally. I guarantee you never see hear another body man or woman in power persons of legal religious authority leaders ever freely accept that level of physical mental financial spiritual accountability for anything the do ever. One reason they don't have the best interest of the majority of the population's needs at heart) another reason may be they come from a bloodline of cowards or simply have a lifestyle that suggests confirms validating them as being feebleminded physically inadequate submissive subservient which may be genetically inherited or a simple generic synthetic learned behavior. In layman's terms these points have been scientifically classified religiously verified as the absolute truth the only way to constantly consistently make each moment of life physically mentally financially spiritually beneficial S.R.F.

it is a simple concept basic logic if life is not free why the hell would death be any cheaper it's not. So the question one may wonder is the spiritual cost to one's own soul and spirit for having lived and died to the lowest standards of quality for so many years now global pollution has diminished the quality of life to the point where today's people are living, dying and yielding the worst spiritual kickback that has ever been manifested since the beginning of life only getting worse. The polar opposite extreme to that is today's people should be living and dying to the highest standards of quality which would make each and every moment physically, mentally, financially and spiritually beneficial. S.R.F.

Amazing!!!
Just keep the good work up!👍
You've our trust and support!✨