Комментарии:
oh bernardo , arguments will never be evidence for anything ,
either sh*t and get of the pot ... or just ... stand NEXT to the toilet and piss all over the place , it's Your choice of course ,
but which one sounds more rational now , which one ... IS it ... ?
This guy is a nut
ОтветитьKudos to you, Matt, for allowing Bernardo to speak uninterrupted. Bernardo's command of ontological idealism and the philosophy of mind is unmatched.
Ответитьhahahahahahah
ОтветитьReality is the mind....until you get punched in the mouth😂
ОтветитьIf there is a representation, then there must be something that is represented. So there is in any case a kind of outside world.There may be surprising preconditions that we cannot look beyond or maybe not. But that doesn't matter at all. This automatically means that the present representation is identical to the objectively given outside world . Therefore, we are justified in calling the present one realistic.
ОтветитьTalking never does it, mere entertainment...silence..
ОтветитьSo if the visible world is a manifestation of observation, does that lead us to one meta conciseness, what some call God?
ОтветитьGreat conversation!
ОтветитьWhy isn't Bernardo moving but he can talk😮
ОтветитьIf a dissociation in MAL led to an organism as complex as a cell capable of reproducing itself, one wonders if this was a completely random event, or if it follows some sort of inherited pattern in MAL itself. What makes anything go against entropy at all?
Ответить