This Genius Airplane consumes Less Fuel than SUV

This Genius Airplane consumes Less Fuel than SUV

Future Lab

1 год назад

1,989,714 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

Rashmi Ranjan Nayak
Rashmi Ranjan Nayak - 17.09.2023 09:18

Let it to be happen

Ответить
Seafariireland
Seafariireland - 16.09.2023 16:22

Great progress!

Ответить
Julien Rocher
Julien Rocher - 11.09.2023 23:17

Way too early to introduce hydrogen power. Given the range is is not cost effective.

Ответить
DroneFootage
DroneFootage - 11.09.2023 00:55

at some point elon musk will have had enough of this charade and make a full-size electric aircraft that costs less than anything out there.

Ответить
Gadzonka
Gadzonka - 10.09.2023 19:12

An airship gets better mileage.

Ответить
Ferraz Couto
Ferraz Couto - 08.09.2023 23:50

Imagine with a efective turbine with tath aerodinamic

Ответить
Robin Spencer
Robin Spencer - 08.09.2023 13:09

This must be a wake up call to the big aircraft manufacturers... everyone is worried about the future and this looks like it has some important answers.

Ответить
its uptome
its uptome - 07.09.2023 19:09

What about high-speed parachutes?

Ответить
boe dilllard
boe dilllard - 07.09.2023 05:05

Is that City or Highway? :)

Ответить
Joseph Ellul
Joseph Ellul - 05.09.2023 02:53

if you think fossil fuel usage is causing climate change you are misguided

Ответить
Stee whoop
Stee whoop - 05.09.2023 00:55

Hate to break it to you but regular flight comercial flight is over 80mpg per passenger... You can decarb the planet by breathing in a paper bag... Clown shoes

Ответить
Dan Harold
Dan Harold - 05.09.2023 00:32

Recent efforts to launch hydrogen rockets are often delay due to very hard to find hydrogen leaks. Perfect choice!

Ответить
Petje
Petje - 04.09.2023 22:17

Great but could be more efficient with a Toroidal propeller.
Besides a rear prop makes landing and take off more challenging.

Ответить
GermanGreetings
GermanGreetings - 04.09.2023 19:25

There is so much pessimism in Germany... I am delighted, that this concept proceeds. There are so many short-range flights in Europe. Good look and success for this gamechanging endeavor :)

Ответить
Flubber Lane
Flubber Lane - 04.09.2023 12:38

Why is it so ugly looking ?

Ответить
Bob Boberson
Bob Boberson - 04.09.2023 08:39

Ridiculous.

Ответить
Biffgee
Biffgee - 04.09.2023 06:25

A diesel engine still makes the most sense. Diesel is available most anywhere on the planet.

Ответить
Gary Lee
Gary Lee - 03.09.2023 16:13

Out standing !

Ответить
Arcturus
Arcturus - 03.09.2023 10:44

A plane for the global elite after they have stopped you from flying - don't kid yourself

Ответить
Arcturus
Arcturus - 03.09.2023 10:40

the decarbon bollox

Ответить
David Dunmore
David Dunmore - 02.09.2023 17:37

And the pusher prop helps auite a bit as pusher props are significantly more efficient than conventional forward facing ones.

Ответить
CharlesHrodric
CharlesHrodric - 02.09.2023 07:01

I have drawings from when I was about 8 years old of an aircraft I designed that looks like this one. Only that mine was propelled by 5 rocket engines at the back and had a Delta Wing.

Ответить
Kenny Hagan
Kenny Hagan - 01.09.2023 18:21

The thing looks kinda like a tuna with wings.

Ответить
Yahya KR
Yahya KR - 28.08.2023 10:53

Not only it consumes similar fuel to trucks it also named like one of them 👍

Ответить
Gary Camp
Gary Camp - 28.08.2023 04:33

Sounds good but too bad it is not scaleable to 7xx/3xx sizes. I wonder why? And wont be here till 2025? Nuts.

Ответить
Drone Pilot 260 RC
Drone Pilot 260 RC - 24.08.2023 23:01

I would definitely like to fly one of these 🎉

Ответить
Drone Pilot 260 RC
Drone Pilot 260 RC - 24.08.2023 22:57

Make electric aircraft 😂

Ответить
Maltduck100
Maltduck100 - 24.08.2023 05:38

looks good got good range looks easy to fly

Ответить
james orenthal
james orenthal - 23.08.2023 17:51

I'd fly the diesel model and I won't fly electric.

Ответить
BoboSixx II
BoboSixx II - 23.08.2023 02:23

I'll take two! Free shipping I Wonder?

Ответить
Cupidity
Cupidity - 22.08.2023 19:39

It looks like something someone made in kerbel space program

Ответить
David Klimek
David Klimek - 22.08.2023 19:36

Still for the rich only! Not the everyday person!

Ответить
Theo Hess
Theo Hess - 21.08.2023 18:44

Bull shit decarbonaisation - 0.04% since 150 years !! Forget Climatechange, it's fearmongering

Ответить
Doc Ondrusek
Doc Ondrusek - 21.08.2023 06:01

Horse Hockey on your "Global Warming" and "de-carbonization" nonsense. It's a SCAM and every sane person knows it. But that doesn't mean that new, high efficiency aircraft aren't totally cool.

Ответить
Gary C
Gary C - 20.08.2023 01:23

If the company can get FAA certification, as well as EAA certification, the aircraft offers great potential. Having said that, the last time I looked, the current price is pushing $4 million. Most people who operate a six-passenger aircraft are not able or willing to spend that sort of money. The CirrusJet is about the same cost, and it's available now.
Both aircraft will use Jet-A as fuel. Granted, the Celera will use less, but it's still two years away from certification and production, and we don't know where things are going to be there. The country is in decline, businesses are gone, and the money to spend on this tech is already being spent on current tech.
I think it's a great idea, but I'm not sure how well it's going to be received by those with four million dollars to spend on it.

Next thing, the aircraft uses laminar flow, which has been around for a very long time in aviation, but presents some challenges. The aircraft will have to be kept clean. Laminar flow is easily 'tripped', meaning it can be disrupted, which in this particular case can cause a substantial reduction in performance. The owner/operator will need to make sure the airplane is able to maintain the laminar flow.

Next, the hydrogen fuel system. This is great, being able to travel from L.A. to Seattle on a single charge of hydrogen with the only emission being water is wonderful. How many airports have a hydrogen storage system? None that I'm aware of. The only places for hydrogen refueling stations are California and Hawaii. None of the airports there support hydrogen refueling. The Toronto Pearson airport in Toronto, Canada is planning on installing a hydrogen fueling station, but only for ground vehicles. So, to use this airplane as a zero-emission vehicle, airports will need to invest millions of dollars to store and dispense hydrogen. There are huge dangers in hydrogen, as well, and if people forget, I suggest you look up the Hindenburg airship from the 1930s. We already have fuel spills on refueling, this is common. Imagine a fuel leak on a hydrogen-powered vehicle. Since it is a gas, it's harder to detect and easier to ignite.

If we can accept the risks, and overcome the requirements, and find an audience willing to shell out the required amount of money to own one, I think a Jet-A-powered version would be awesome. There might be ten or twelve sold in 2025/2026, but I don't know how many after that. Look to Beechcraft's Starship. A great airplane, ahead of its time that did not sell well and was discontinued because the aviation community was not ready to accept such forward-thinking design in aviation.

Ответить
Charles Springer
Charles Springer - 19.08.2023 23:39

I have NEVER seen a bullet shaped like that. And you can't change the climate by changing CO2 production by the US and EU. In fact if youdo reduce CO2 enough to change the climate, hundreds of millions of people will starve to death. Please stop with the scientism. Build your electric plane AFTER the new nuclear power plants. Enough of the landscape is already blighted with windmills and solar farms. Think like human beings, not sheep.

Ответить
Fred Levine
Fred Levine - 19.08.2023 21:06

I don’t know of ANY airports that have Diesel fuel.

Ответить
Russell Bonds
Russell Bonds - 19.08.2023 08:27

I’ll stick to 51,000’ doing .93 Mach in the Citation X as I cruise well above the global warming BS being spewed by everyone else.

Ответить
Simon Wilson
Simon Wilson - 19.08.2023 04:59

This looks amazing and very promising, good luck!

Ответить
DJ Switzer
DJ Switzer - 19.08.2023 04:52

I bet the purchase price is more than an SUV.

Ответить
Privatepilot
Privatepilot - 18.08.2023 23:04

Hint: When you mentioned global warming I stopped the video and gave you a thumbs down. Just sayin’.

Ответить
Ranapratap Singh
Ranapratap Singh - 18.08.2023 21:52

Great aeroplane.

Ответить
Captain_CGC
Captain_CGC - 18.08.2023 12:09

So much misinformation. No way this plane will fly for less fuel than an SUV. Scam.

Ответить
Teri Dawe
Teri Dawe - 18.08.2023 05:07

Forget the hydrogen bs... And it has a useless payload.

Ответить
Pennypack MTB
Pennypack MTB - 18.08.2023 02:59

Instead of our present governments requiring everything to become electric, they should be searching for and developing cleaner alternative flues, like hydrogen.

Ответить
shadeburst
shadeburst - 17.08.2023 21:08

"Emission-free electric aviation." Emission-free big LOL.

Ответить
Jonathan Diaz
Jonathan Diaz - 17.08.2023 12:28

Imagine this with the new propeller design

Ответить
computerjantje
computerjantje - 16.08.2023 21:30

hahahahaha this is fake. It has not enough lift compared to the size. A good project to see how far people go in funding their own wished fantasies

Ответить
Russell Bamberger
Russell Bamberger - 16.08.2023 21:06

I think these things are going to start around $5 million. I wonder if a smaller version ( 4 seater) that could do 200 mph and had greater wing surface area could get the price down to under $1 million. This would be a much larger market. 50 miles per gallon ?

Ответить
#A Minor
#A Minor - 16.08.2023 20:18

Yes, I think at this point this can private and point-2-point aviation. I am excited and looking forward to more updates!

Ответить