Why Russia's T-14 Armata Remains Unseen in the Battlefield

Why Russia's T-14 Armata Remains Unseen in the Battlefield

Military TV

9 месяцев назад

282,371 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@laurencebrowning1545
@laurencebrowning1545 - 08.03.2024 19:52

The Russians likely don’t need to use these tanks in the SMO - they seem to be steadily demilitarising Ukraine using all their old stock of tanks from 1980’s on!

Ответить
@hossaintaufiq3136
@hossaintaufiq3136 - 08.03.2024 21:21

The age of tank is now gone.

Ответить
@Ilovepotatofr
@Ilovepotatofr - 08.03.2024 23:26

You all are criticizing Russia for its T-14 armata, but what about challengers, leopards and M1A1 Abrahams that are burning like hell, destroyed by just cheap fpv drones, prooves that threse tanks are scraps too

Ответить
@rogerdiogo6893
@rogerdiogo6893 - 09.03.2024 19:24

They keeping the tank for when they reach Paris 😂😂😂

Ответить
@huithu
@huithu - 10.03.2024 16:53

Because if it fails,it would be huge blow to morale of the troops.

Ответить
@kris8165
@kris8165 - 11.03.2024 03:14

Wishes and reality...
I guess many bugs to polish 😅
Nice looking tank though 😁

Ответить
@雪アンアン
@雪アンアン - 11.03.2024 08:45

The answer mostly is the same as US top end tanks arent seen aswell in ukraine.

Ответить
@anthonynicholich9654
@anthonynicholich9654 - 11.03.2024 10:55

Because Russians are so smart and have good reasons for tha! West is stupid too arrogant to see that

Ответить
@fulviopolce9785
@fulviopolce9785 - 13.03.2024 20:46

Perché non c'è bisogno.

Ответить
@orlandob9958
@orlandob9958 - 15.03.2024 04:23

If I had to come up with my own theory , without any media influence from pro or anti , I’d go with…..there’s no need for it bc they’re saving it for the grand finale if needed.
Of course we can all agree that nothing is invincible, regardless of who produces it. As of right now artillery is doing its job so why risk getting the baby blown up before it’s stamped its mark In the military industrial complex ?

Ответить
@crushthis123
@crushthis123 - 16.03.2024 18:00

Every boggy on the tank should be an electric wheel. This way even though the track is taken out it could possibly still be mobile avoiding a second shot

Ответить
@richsmith7200
@richsmith7200 - 22.03.2024 05:39

So.....being afraid to use it in combat with a much smaller, non nuclear opponent, is less damaging to its 'reputation '??? What use is it??

Ответить
@MichaelCharalambous-n4u
@MichaelCharalambous-n4u - 04.04.2024 22:53

Why they should when they can do the job with out it 😂😂

Ответить
@Busybee-tt1qu
@Busybee-tt1qu - 06.04.2024 20:12

The reason why it’s not been deployed in the Ukraine is the first one to be blown up will destroy its invulnerability myth and if as we have seen countless times it’s tracks get blown off and the crew run away the tank runs the risk of being captured and examined at length by the west even put on display. That’s why the west only supplies old version of its tanks to the Ukraine.

Ответить
@SS18w4531g00
@SS18w4531g00 - 07.04.2024 22:39

They have LED lights, didn`t know russia has such tech.

Ответить
@bestopinion9257
@bestopinion9257 - 14.04.2024 18:33

Because of the latest invisible Russian technology.

Ответить
@PHARAOH375
@PHARAOH375 - 15.04.2024 05:41

BRAVO RUSSIA 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

Ответить
@FireTheHoker
@FireTheHoker - 18.04.2024 13:59

all i heard was blah blah blah western propaganda blah blah.

Ответить
@monkeydog1436
@monkeydog1436 - 19.04.2024 06:15

Easily defeated by a $1000.- FPV drone...

Ответить
@bijoylaha7245
@bijoylaha7245 - 05.05.2024 20:18

Full transfer of technology russia handover in india full buyers india

Ответить
@MelchizedekKohen
@MelchizedekKohen - 13.05.2024 02:38

Tanks are obsolete

Ответить
@سامانبیرانوند-ر5غ
@سامانبیرانوند-ر5غ - 18.05.2024 17:55

روسیه بزرگ زنده باد پوتین بزرگ

Ответить
@mikimaus5420
@mikimaus5420 - 18.05.2024 21:28

Toilet is the only thing that works in this tank.

Ответить
@axeman3d
@axeman3d - 24.05.2024 16:23

An unreliable engine they can't fix, sensors bought second hand from early 2000's Le Clercs, active missile defence that needs one of the crew to fire it if he notices a missile, anti-mine countermeasures that don't exist and an autoloader the crew can't access to unjam. All of these wonderful advances in a tank they can't afford and can't build without western tech. Russians make a lot of claims and so far all of them appear to be complete lies.

Ответить
@victoryfirst2878
@victoryfirst2878 - 25.05.2024 07:32

WHATEVER THE RUSSKIES SAY ABOUT THE ARMADA TANK IS JUST BALONEY LOOK AT WHAT IS HAPPENING IN UKRAINE. THE TANKS ARE JUST PAPERWEIGHTS. NOTHING MORE.
RUSSIAN JUNK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ответить
@AndreiPeckerson
@AndreiPeckerson - 28.05.2024 11:43

The entire point of armata was an excuse to steal from the budget, while boasting to the world the non-existent national "greatness".

Ответить
@maciejpoec8666
@maciejpoec8666 - 04.06.2024 19:02

He He He widmo, not made.

Ответить
@tvgerbil1984
@tvgerbil1984 - 10.06.2024 10:02

It has a new perfect camouflage and sleath. Not even the crews can find it.

Ответить
@DenisPereira
@DenisPereira - 13.06.2024 07:52

as a western i think that its not a war fit for the T-14.. like its not even needed , T-72/80/90 can continue to serve like always, there is no need for a "more powerful tank"

Ответить
@strix001
@strix001 - 13.06.2024 15:14

T-14 a flop of the highest magnitude ))). We now know that it actually can drive, and spin its turret ).

Ответить
@VV-99999
@VV-99999 - 15.06.2024 10:55

You will not see the SU-57 on the battlefield either.

Ответить
@boyan7227
@boyan7227 - 15.06.2024 12:22

Coz they are few and no guarantee to start the engine 😅😅😅

Ответить
@davidlanders2853
@davidlanders2853 - 15.06.2024 23:31

"Why Russia's T-14 Armata Remains Unseen in the Battlefield" lots of parades? I mean if you only have four of them............

Ответить
@castlerock58
@castlerock58 - 20.06.2024 06:47

They could be redesigning it to deal with the threat of drones before putting it into production. Drones are a radical new threat that both sides are adapting to. New tanks will need to have effective defenses against them. Those are still being developed. It is also possible that it is more cost effective to produce the T-90M. In the past, the Russians have gone with a mix of expensive tanks and cheaper tanks. Maybe they will produce both tanks once some final changes are made to the T-14. All this is highly classified so we have no access to Russian thinking or the real test data for the T-14.

Ответить
@erik_1953
@erik_1953 - 20.06.2024 11:29

The sides and back of the tank should look the same as the front! Wake up Russia. This is not 1914.

Ответить
@Astra.._..
@Astra.._.. - 23.06.2024 20:49

Bro sounds like he got his script from chat gpt

Ответить
@thewayseeker
@thewayseeker - 24.06.2024 00:10

This video makes no sense.

Ответить
@breakthesystem6198
@breakthesystem6198 - 29.06.2024 02:57

Russia would be stupid to commit any t14s with war with NATO as a possible development

Ответить
@zenko247
@zenko247 - 30.06.2024 14:52

Cardboard is no good in Battle

Ответить
@JoeyRay-fz1qe
@JoeyRay-fz1qe - 05.07.2024 00:37

The US and Russia have a different position on producing equipment. The US like to build weapons with flaws in them and spend billions of dollars fixing them while Russia like to build a few finding the bugs before putting them in production. They wanted to use a 152mm gun instead of the 125mm so they developed one and now have it and they now begin production. No countries rush their test vehicles into battle but wait till they have enough to outfit and train the crews before doing that!

Ответить
@russellk.bonney8534
@russellk.bonney8534 - 05.07.2024 09:30

T14 is being saved for other more worthy foes.

Ответить
@russellk.bonney8534
@russellk.bonney8534 - 05.07.2024 09:43

A public relations nightmare much like the western tanjs suffered?

Ответить
@Hotmail.ie3pph
@Hotmail.ie3pph - 11.07.2024 06:39

😮

Ответить
@danwitzke5947
@danwitzke5947 - 21.07.2024 01:27

They know it will get blown up by drones like every other vehicle does no matter how "advanced" it's supposed to be.

Ответить
@chandrachurniyogi8394
@chandrachurniyogi8394 - 30.07.2024 11:53

the T-14B Armata main battle tank could do with a manned turret variant . . . the T-14B Armata suspension could do with a proper coil spring based 6.3 in. suspension lift that'll complement the torsion bar setup . . . thus providing superior off road prowess & higher break over angle in harsh terrain . . .

Ответить
@HavardCastiglioni
@HavardCastiglioni - 02.08.2024 05:50

The design with the T-14 armata looked impressive, and sharp. In spite of the issues with it's mechanical and technological features, the design is impressive. If the US were to acquire such a tank (T-14 armata) it would make a lot of sense. Either way, impressive design. Especially the auto turret (canon and machine gun).

Ответить
@wolfschanze.
@wolfschanze. - 03.08.2024 19:44

There is no point to replyng to comments of who understand nothing of armor .

Ответить
@joshlower1
@joshlower1 - 10.08.2024 01:06

Because russias using ukraine as a a training exercise amd also to get rid of all its okd cokd war junk

Ответить
@マヒャ
@マヒャ - 31.08.2024 17:40

This tank looks weak to me.

Ответить
@RacerX1971
@RacerX1971 - 08.10.2024 01:17

Why? Prolly only built 20 for show and that's it...

Ответить