Комментарии:
The Russians likely don’t need to use these tanks in the SMO - they seem to be steadily demilitarising Ukraine using all their old stock of tanks from 1980’s on!
ОтветитьThe age of tank is now gone.
ОтветитьYou all are criticizing Russia for its T-14 armata, but what about challengers, leopards and M1A1 Abrahams that are burning like hell, destroyed by just cheap fpv drones, prooves that threse tanks are scraps too
ОтветитьThey keeping the tank for when they reach Paris 😂😂😂
ОтветитьBecause if it fails,it would be huge blow to morale of the troops.
ОтветитьWishes and reality...
I guess many bugs to polish 😅
Nice looking tank though 😁
The answer mostly is the same as US top end tanks arent seen aswell in ukraine.
ОтветитьBecause Russians are so smart and have good reasons for tha! West is stupid too arrogant to see that
ОтветитьPerché non c'è bisogno.
ОтветитьIf I had to come up with my own theory , without any media influence from pro or anti , I’d go with…..there’s no need for it bc they’re saving it for the grand finale if needed.
Of course we can all agree that nothing is invincible, regardless of who produces it. As of right now artillery is doing its job so why risk getting the baby blown up before it’s stamped its mark In the military industrial complex ?
Every boggy on the tank should be an electric wheel. This way even though the track is taken out it could possibly still be mobile avoiding a second shot
ОтветитьSo.....being afraid to use it in combat with a much smaller, non nuclear opponent, is less damaging to its 'reputation '??? What use is it??
ОтветитьWhy they should when they can do the job with out it 😂😂
ОтветитьThe reason why it’s not been deployed in the Ukraine is the first one to be blown up will destroy its invulnerability myth and if as we have seen countless times it’s tracks get blown off and the crew run away the tank runs the risk of being captured and examined at length by the west even put on display. That’s why the west only supplies old version of its tanks to the Ukraine.
ОтветитьThey have LED lights, didn`t know russia has such tech.
ОтветитьBecause of the latest invisible Russian technology.
ОтветитьBRAVO RUSSIA 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
Ответитьall i heard was blah blah blah western propaganda blah blah.
ОтветитьEasily defeated by a $1000.- FPV drone...
ОтветитьFull transfer of technology russia handover in india full buyers india
ОтветитьTanks are obsolete
Ответитьروسیه بزرگ زنده باد پوتین بزرگ
ОтветитьToilet is the only thing that works in this tank.
ОтветитьAn unreliable engine they can't fix, sensors bought second hand from early 2000's Le Clercs, active missile defence that needs one of the crew to fire it if he notices a missile, anti-mine countermeasures that don't exist and an autoloader the crew can't access to unjam. All of these wonderful advances in a tank they can't afford and can't build without western tech. Russians make a lot of claims and so far all of them appear to be complete lies.
ОтветитьWHATEVER THE RUSSKIES SAY ABOUT THE ARMADA TANK IS JUST BALONEY LOOK AT WHAT IS HAPPENING IN UKRAINE. THE TANKS ARE JUST PAPERWEIGHTS. NOTHING MORE.
RUSSIAN JUNK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The entire point of armata was an excuse to steal from the budget, while boasting to the world the non-existent national "greatness".
ОтветитьHe He He widmo, not made.
ОтветитьIt has a new perfect camouflage and sleath. Not even the crews can find it.
Ответитьas a western i think that its not a war fit for the T-14.. like its not even needed , T-72/80/90 can continue to serve like always, there is no need for a "more powerful tank"
ОтветитьT-14 a flop of the highest magnitude ))). We now know that it actually can drive, and spin its turret ).
ОтветитьYou will not see the SU-57 on the battlefield either.
ОтветитьCoz they are few and no guarantee to start the engine 😅😅😅
Ответить"Why Russia's T-14 Armata Remains Unseen in the Battlefield" lots of parades? I mean if you only have four of them............
ОтветитьThey could be redesigning it to deal with the threat of drones before putting it into production. Drones are a radical new threat that both sides are adapting to. New tanks will need to have effective defenses against them. Those are still being developed. It is also possible that it is more cost effective to produce the T-90M. In the past, the Russians have gone with a mix of expensive tanks and cheaper tanks. Maybe they will produce both tanks once some final changes are made to the T-14. All this is highly classified so we have no access to Russian thinking or the real test data for the T-14.
ОтветитьThe sides and back of the tank should look the same as the front! Wake up Russia. This is not 1914.
ОтветитьBro sounds like he got his script from chat gpt
ОтветитьThis video makes no sense.
ОтветитьRussia would be stupid to commit any t14s with war with NATO as a possible development
ОтветитьCardboard is no good in Battle
ОтветитьThe US and Russia have a different position on producing equipment. The US like to build weapons with flaws in them and spend billions of dollars fixing them while Russia like to build a few finding the bugs before putting them in production. They wanted to use a 152mm gun instead of the 125mm so they developed one and now have it and they now begin production. No countries rush their test vehicles into battle but wait till they have enough to outfit and train the crews before doing that!
ОтветитьT14 is being saved for other more worthy foes.
ОтветитьA public relations nightmare much like the western tanjs suffered?
Ответить😮
ОтветитьThey know it will get blown up by drones like every other vehicle does no matter how "advanced" it's supposed to be.
Ответитьthe T-14B Armata main battle tank could do with a manned turret variant . . . the T-14B Armata suspension could do with a proper coil spring based 6.3 in. suspension lift that'll complement the torsion bar setup . . . thus providing superior off road prowess & higher break over angle in harsh terrain . . .
ОтветитьThe design with the T-14 armata looked impressive, and sharp. In spite of the issues with it's mechanical and technological features, the design is impressive. If the US were to acquire such a tank (T-14 armata) it would make a lot of sense. Either way, impressive design. Especially the auto turret (canon and machine gun).
ОтветитьThere is no point to replyng to comments of who understand nothing of armor .
ОтветитьBecause russias using ukraine as a a training exercise amd also to get rid of all its okd cokd war junk
ОтветитьThis tank looks weak to me.
ОтветитьWhy? Prolly only built 20 for show and that's it...
Ответить