Комментарии:
Glad someone is still following this catastrophe…keep us up-to-date. Thanks!
ОтветитьWhy can't they use the parts that didn't fall down
ОтветитьI’m sure word came down from on high to speed up the process, “environment be damned, we’ve got an election to win”
ОтветитьHow do you build on time and under budget. It is a replacement for one destroyed by freeloader. Goods being transported and vessel transporting them all have insurance. Bridge was just there doing what bridges are supposed to be doing. Somebody already paid for it.
Ответитьone of the most disgusting issues is you have many government entities all sucking off the taxpayers working against each other greatly increasing the costs of projects like this even before any construction begins.
ОтветитьI still think the shipping company SHOULD BE LIABLE for the disaster that was clearly their fault
ОтветитьWeak start is an understatement. Need a concrete batch plant and an American Flag are the first two steps and not some clown who has talking points that no one is interested in. Clearly need something spectacular here and massive as well to secure USA National Security interests for the Region not a bunch of cheap junk as a for profit enterprise which is how the previous bridge collapsed.
ОтветитьDEI Newscasters
ОтветитьI keep hearing "we're replacing two lanes in each direction..." I hope that includes inner and outer break down lanes. The SF Bay bridge opened in 2013, all the environmental work was done in the 90's and early 00's. Pile driving started in 2008.
ОтветитьThis was very informative, thank you 🙏
Ответить