Комментарии:
bro, have you not heard of a catenary?
ОтветитьImagine this how we’ll evolve travel
ОтветитьVice city lol
ОтветитьTriangles is not the proper shape for square wheels. Something like |sin(x)| is.
ОтветитьHow would you make a turn?
Ответить“The only reason it stopped is because the road blocked it from slipping further” DUH, the blue truck can’t be pulled either for the same reason….
ОтветитьWhat is the name of the game and what system does it work on?
ОтветитьWhat map is this?
ОтветитьNo
Ответитьbro has 1m+ subs and still doesnt has a mic 💀💀💀
Ответитьconsidering our circle shaped wheels have no match for circle shaped potholes idk lmao
ОтветитьVsauce actually did a video that included this type of thing. You'd need the track to be semi-circles.
ОтветитьI was so glad to see that an original concept finally proved some advantage against the boring norm. Innovation is key!!
Ответитьyou need a bumpy road for square wheels, not triangle.
Ответитьcylinder wheels to drive on water
ОтветитьAh yes, I too would enjoy replacing my socks and ball joints every 30-40 miles.
ОтветитьCars in Canada be like...
ОтветитьThis is the dumbest idea I think Ive possibly ever seen
Ответитьhow do you even drift
ОтветитьHow would snow removal work?
ОтветитьIn a perfect world where driving is perfect and everyone can be ideally symmetrical when driving regardless of speed? Maybe yeah
ОтветитьThe blue truck with square tires wins the tug-o-war because the orange truck has to overcome both the force of the blue trucks engine AND it has to pull the square tires over the triangles which adds more force. It'd be like pulling something heavy up stairs, can you imagine how much more difficult that'd be? To have to overcome each step as you pull? Yeah that blue truck was never going to budge. It didn't pull the other truck in the first round sure but still, it clearly was having an easier time of it
Ответитьuntil there's a pothole which is even more likely in this and your wheel gets unalligned
ОтветитьAll theses squares make a circle
Ответитьthis looks smoother than birmingham roads
Ответитьthe depth of the triangles has to be as deep as the wheels
ОтветитьHow will you turn onto difrent roads ortake exits
Ответитьhow do you turn
Ответитьhow do you turn
ОтветитьThis video will be to great benefit for canada's roads in the future.
(slight south park reference)
Now if you angle the road incline very steep (beyond 40 degrees) and put a brake lock on the drivetrain to prevent it from slipping backward you've essentially recreated a cog (or rack) railway first used in 1812.
Ответитьyou need catenary curves
ОтветитьAh yes busting myths i see.
ОтветитьThe extra effort of making a road like that is the opposite of genius. Square tires should just not exist because they are terrible. Mythbusters prove that round tires are the best that can be done so far.
Some of the tests are just laughably flawed and stupid.
How many car batteries can we throw in the ocean using this method?
ОтветитьRight angled triangles….?
Ответитьdefinatly smoother while driving slowly
ОтветитьYou have to make the surface out of hemispheres, not triangles. If you do hemispheres (of the correct size) then it's smooth.
ОтветитьHaven't watched the whole video yet, and maybe it gets tested, but I think turning would be miserable
ОтветитьХех, ты чего, "Ну, погоди!" не смотрел? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
ОтветитьThere's the easiest for to this, idk how people don't know it
ОтветитьLets move to some slightly bigger triangles 🤨 what do you mean by that 🤨
ОтветитьWhy is in miles per hour ?
ОтветитьWhats the map called? I've had it before but I forget what it's called? I uninstalled it.
ОтветитьThe last test is in vice city,so good
ОтветитьIdeally half cylinders should be smoother for square wheels 🤗
ОтветитьCan we get a square peg in a round hole?
ОтветитьHi
Ответить