Комментарии:
I had to stop and thank you for the video. You including the Sigma F2 was great, but you showing all of them mounted on the camera was really cool. Size factor matter for me.
ОтветитьWhy didn't you compare 100% crop examples?? This way we can't see which lens is sharper which should have been kinda a big part of this comparison.
ОтветитьReturning to this in late 2023 – I'm bummed about the wide-open performance, and I think it's a bit of a miss from Sigma on this one. If it weren't for color fringing and bokeh rings, I think the Samyang 35mm 1.4 II would be the best competitor at the price.
Ответитьgreat and detailed video. Really helped me on my purchase
ОтветитьSigma 1.2 is best
Even better than the Sony albeit slower focus and FPS
The Sigma 1.2 appeared like the best lens of the three, hands down. But it's huge. Sigma 1.4 is the best value. Sony sits in the middle in terms of quality, but most compact of them all.
Ответить「動画の音が良くない」、
ОтветитьThanks Gordon. That was a lot of solid work. Like your rigorous reviews.
ОтветитьYou are the best!! Thank you
ОтветитьLove
ОтветитьFantastic! How would you compare the 35mm 1.8 sony to the 35m 1.4 sigma? Optical and rendering wise?
ОтветитьYou compare the Sigma in the end with the Sony 1.8 and I wonder why not comparing it to the Zeiss 1.4 which is (although it is a bit older) the direct competitor in this price range. So a comparison would be appropriate here.
ОтветитьThanks Gordon, need this for my SL2. Wish theyd do a 50mm 1.4 DN lens...
ОтветитьYou should do a comparison of the Sigma 35 f1.2 and the Sony 50 f1.2. The 50 is not quite a 50...and the 35 is more narrow than 35.
ОтветитьYour best comparison review ever. You should win an Emmy for this!
ОтветитьI actually wanted to buy the GM but then I found a used Sigma 35 DG DN for 650 dollars and this was a no brainer! So I bought it
ОтветитьYou're a machine, Gordon! Love how every test is illustrated and presented rather than just asserting stuff. Your reviews have been a help to me from years ago when I started choosing systems and cameras, to now when I am buying lenses.
ОтветитьGreat tests thanks. Will be getting the GM. :)
ОтветитьThanks a lot for the thorough review, Gordon!
Did you realise any heavy CA with the Sigma 1.4 DG DN?
Considering the even larger price difference in Germany to the Sony 1.4 GM (converted: Sigma £726 vs Sony £1450!), I heavily tend towards the new Sigma 1.4. Will likely order it later this week. Cheers
sony dont have a 35mm 1.8 G... there is no G in that lens...
ОтветитьNice to see the 35mm F2 included. The size difference is quite apparent and for traveling, I think it's hard to beat. It's nice to see a slower F2 model as well with an aperture ring and above average OOF rendering. Up from there...and if I were looking for the speed...I'd probably just go 35mm 1.4 GM. Although, some end of year rebates on the Sigma 35mm 1.4 could make it significantly more attractive by widening the price gap over the GM.
Sooo, I'd go Sigma 35mm f2 for travel and 35mm 1.4 GM if I wanted it all...size be damned.
Undisputed heavyweight 🤣😂
Love your videos 👍
Just so informative, thank you so much!!!
ОтветитьWish somebody just make the 105 1.4 smaller lol
Ответить带字幕看完了,简直是见过得最详细的测评之一,很有帮助!
ОтветитьThe sigma 35mm 1.2 has terrible LOCA, terrible!
ОтветитьThanks! Please sigma give us a 135mm dgdn or 104
ОтветитьGreat job, thanks.
ОтветитьSo if you had a choice between the Sony and sigma, price doesn't matter, which would you get
ОтветитьMr.Gordon Laing
Splendid!
I thank you for your review.
どうもありがとう(*^_^*)
good job there Gordon!
ОтветитьOutstanding review, thanks a lot Gordon. So I will stay with the f/2 for smaller bags and if I need to lift heavy, I'll take the f/1.2. Didn't know it's that good! Now I have even more fun with it, although on L-mount sometimes and some lenses are some different stories. Somehow...
ОтветитьHow do you admonish badly-behaved bokeh balls?
ОтветитьYou’ve set the bar for lens comparisons very high with this one. Bravo!
ОтветитьGot the Sony zeiss for years. Then 35 GM release and I know that is it. This new sigma no doubt is better than the old Sony zeiss. But it is still so big and heavy.
ОтветитьLooks like GM is the way to go -- assuming one has the budget for it.
ОтветитьThanks for the video Gordon! Would love Sigma to try to make their lenses a little bit smaller (without making the lens slower).
ОтветитьSony 35mm 1.4 is smaller
ОтветитьHello
Make a video about
Iphone 12 Pro VS
Iphone 12 Pro Max
So far third-parties have zero support of AF tracking at faster than 15 FPS bursts. "Sony does not always support its fastest burst speeds with third-party lenses..." is misleading.
ОтветитьHah, Gordon you are awesome. But I also like Thomas’ very detailed reviews on the camera labs website. I haven’t bought book yet but I will.
Ответитьthe Sony 35mm F1.8 is no "G" lens
ОтветитьThanks for all the work you do! 👍
ОтветитьKeep grinding. Your content is incredible. Thanks!
ОтветитьBRING ON THE RF VERSION! And while you're at it Sigma, an f/1.8 variable zoom would be nice.
Ответить