Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art REVIEW vs Sony 35 f1.4 GM vs Sigma f1.2 and f2

Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art REVIEW vs Sony 35 f1.4 GM vs Sigma f1.2 and f2

Gordon Laing

3 года назад

47,943 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@-ca--
@-ca-- - 06.01.2024 19:32

I had to stop and thank you for the video. You including the Sigma F2 was great, but you showing all of them mounted on the camera was really cool. Size factor matter for me.

Ответить
@johnadams3038
@johnadams3038 - 06.12.2023 13:39

Why didn't you compare 100% crop examples?? This way we can't see which lens is sharper which should have been kinda a big part of this comparison.

Ответить
@markpalfreeman
@markpalfreeman - 28.11.2023 20:39

Returning to this in late 2023 – I'm bummed about the wide-open performance, and I think it's a bit of a miss from Sigma on this one. If it weren't for color fringing and bokeh rings, I think the Samyang 35mm 1.4 II would be the best competitor at the price.

Ответить
@tsebaotfikre6238
@tsebaotfikre6238 - 24.10.2023 16:16

great and detailed video. Really helped me on my purchase

Ответить
@hellopsp180
@hellopsp180 - 12.10.2023 00:21

Sigma 1.2 is best
Even better than the Sony albeit slower focus and FPS

Ответить
@firpofutbol
@firpofutbol - 24.12.2022 09:59

The Sigma 1.2 appeared like the best lens of the three, hands down. But it's huge. Sigma 1.4 is the best value. Sony sits in the middle in terms of quality, but most compact of them all.

Ответить
@ewelinaja2641
@ewelinaja2641 - 11.10.2022 03:47

「動画の音が良くない」、

Ответить
@vandalton4948
@vandalton4948 - 11.08.2022 08:14

Thanks Gordon. That was a lot of solid work. Like your rigorous reviews.

Ответить
@maZec31
@maZec31 - 29.07.2022 16:13

You are the best!! Thank you

Ответить
@maxmaxmaxgoon5602
@maxmaxmaxgoon5602 - 13.06.2022 10:55

Love

Ответить
@Jgheiler
@Jgheiler - 21.02.2022 02:29

Fantastic! How would you compare the 35mm 1.8 sony to the 35m 1.4 sigma? Optical and rendering wise?

Ответить
@flol3266
@flol3266 - 06.12.2021 20:29

You compare the Sigma in the end with the Sony 1.8 and I wonder why not comparing it to the Zeiss 1.4 which is (although it is a bit older) the direct competitor in this price range. So a comparison would be appropriate here.

Ответить
@jukeboxjohnnie
@jukeboxjohnnie - 30.10.2021 21:36

Thanks Gordon, need this for my SL2. Wish theyd do a 50mm 1.4 DN lens...

Ответить
@benholdeman174
@benholdeman174 - 22.10.2021 21:22

You should do a comparison of the Sigma 35 f1.2 and the Sony 50 f1.2. The 50 is not quite a 50...and the 35 is more narrow than 35.

Ответить
@b.walter6646
@b.walter6646 - 02.10.2021 03:12

Your best comparison review ever. You should win an Emmy for this!

Ответить
@patrikkondic83
@patrikkondic83 - 20.09.2021 23:04

I actually wanted to buy the GM but then I found a used Sigma 35 DG DN for 650 dollars and this was a no brainer! So I bought it

Ответить
@sailonstellarwinds
@sailonstellarwinds - 11.09.2021 19:45

You're a machine, Gordon! Love how every test is illustrated and presented rather than just asserting stuff. Your reviews have been a help to me from years ago when I started choosing systems and cameras, to now when I am buying lenses.

Ответить
@paulliddement
@paulliddement - 27.07.2021 01:36

Great tests thanks. Will be getting the GM. :)

Ответить
@tvdlfilms
@tvdlfilms - 13.07.2021 15:58

Thanks a lot for the thorough review, Gordon!
Did you realise any heavy CA with the Sigma 1.4 DG DN?
Considering the even larger price difference in Germany to the Sony 1.4 GM (converted: Sigma £726 vs Sony £1450!), I heavily tend towards the new Sigma 1.4. Will likely order it later this week. Cheers

Ответить
@TheKiwiphotopapi
@TheKiwiphotopapi - 11.07.2021 05:42

sony dont have a 35mm 1.8 G... there is no G in that lens...

Ответить
@thinkinginpictures4071
@thinkinginpictures4071 - 27.06.2021 04:04

Nice to see the 35mm F2 included. The size difference is quite apparent and for traveling, I think it's hard to beat. It's nice to see a slower F2 model as well with an aperture ring and above average OOF rendering. Up from there...and if I were looking for the speed...I'd probably just go 35mm 1.4 GM. Although, some end of year rebates on the Sigma 35mm 1.4 could make it significantly more attractive by widening the price gap over the GM.

Sooo, I'd go Sigma 35mm f2 for travel and 35mm 1.4 GM if I wanted it all...size be damned.

Ответить
@JF..
@JF.. - 18.06.2021 20:54

Undisputed heavyweight 🤣😂
Love your videos 👍

Ответить
@stevofoo
@stevofoo - 24.05.2021 03:15

Just so informative, thank you so much!!!

Ответить
@ralphtime
@ralphtime - 22.05.2021 06:56

Wish somebody just make the 105 1.4 smaller lol

Ответить
@user-us7kw3kc5b
@user-us7kw3kc5b - 19.05.2021 06:08

带字幕看完了,简直是见过得最详细的测评之一,很有帮助!

Ответить
@gr33nDestiny
@gr33nDestiny - 13.05.2021 03:08

The sigma 35mm 1.2 has terrible LOCA, terrible!

Ответить
@ulrickteissier363
@ulrickteissier363 - 03.05.2021 06:36

Thanks! Please sigma give us a 135mm dgdn or 104

Ответить
@puredistancegolf
@puredistancegolf - 02.05.2021 09:35

Great job, thanks.

Ответить
@imtjnotu
@imtjnotu - 02.05.2021 00:05

So if you had a choice between the Sony and sigma, price doesn't matter, which would you get

Ответить
@TourDeMadone
@TourDeMadone - 01.05.2021 18:16

Mr.Gordon Laing
Splendid!
I thank you for your review.

どうもありがとう(*^_^*)

Ответить
@joeblack4026
@joeblack4026 - 30.04.2021 15:36

good job there Gordon!

Ответить
@Joamonica
@Joamonica - 29.04.2021 14:26

Outstanding review, thanks a lot Gordon. So I will stay with the f/2 for smaller bags and if I need to lift heavy, I'll take the f/1.2. Didn't know it's that good! Now I have even more fun with it, although on L-mount sometimes and some lenses are some different stories. Somehow...

Ответить
@orendo
@orendo - 29.04.2021 11:37

How do you admonish badly-behaved bokeh balls?

Ответить
@orendo
@orendo - 29.04.2021 11:32

You’ve set the bar for lens comparisons very high with this one. Bravo!

Ответить
@sgpork
@sgpork - 29.04.2021 09:44

Got the Sony zeiss for years. Then 35 GM release and I know that is it. This new sigma no doubt is better than the old Sony zeiss. But it is still so big and heavy.

Ответить
@armaniusmaximus
@armaniusmaximus - 28.04.2021 22:53

Looks like GM is the way to go -- assuming one has the budget for it.

Ответить
@armaniusmaximus
@armaniusmaximus - 28.04.2021 22:42

Thanks for the video Gordon! Would love Sigma to try to make their lenses a little bit smaller (without making the lens slower).

Ответить
@nishalmj6913
@nishalmj6913 - 28.04.2021 21:32

Sony 35mm 1.4 is smaller

Ответить
@kmandrews_
@kmandrews_ - 28.04.2021 19:47

Hello
Make a video about
Iphone 12 Pro VS
Iphone 12 Pro Max

Ответить
@QuietOC
@QuietOC - 28.04.2021 16:08

So far third-parties have zero support of AF tracking at faster than 15 FPS bursts. "Sony does not always support its fastest burst speeds with third-party lenses..." is misleading.

Ответить
@michailxyntarakis1590
@michailxyntarakis1590 - 28.04.2021 15:17

Hah, Gordon you are awesome. But I also like Thomas’ very detailed reviews on the camera labs website. I haven’t bought book yet but I will.

Ответить
@keepcoding1
@keepcoding1 - 28.04.2021 09:28

the Sony 35mm F1.8 is no "G" lens

Ответить
@akirafan28
@akirafan28 - 28.04.2021 08:49

Thanks for all the work you do! 👍

Ответить
@zispop
@zispop - 27.04.2021 23:12

Keep grinding. Your content is incredible. Thanks!

Ответить
@dominey
@dominey - 27.04.2021 22:52

BRING ON THE RF VERSION! And while you're at it Sigma, an f/1.8 variable zoom would be nice.

Ответить