Biggest Breakthroughs in Physics: 2023

thanks for the video!

Современные приборы позволяют создать учебно - практическое, мобильное пособие школьникам, для изучения "Теории относительности" Эйнштейна. О таком приборе, мечтал - А. Эйнштейн как да создавал свою "Теорию относительности". К примеру опыт Майкельсона Морли 1881 - 2024 г завершенный на 50%… + 50% НОВЫХ измерений возможно выполнить, с помощью некруглых катушек с оптическим волокном в 9000 м., в каждом плече. При габаритах 25 см, ГИБРИД гироскоп возможно применить в автотранспорте, при движении прямолинейно измерять скорость 20, 25, 30 м/сек. Так мы сможем для большой науки, сэкономить большие 💰. В Китае и Индии в плане строительства детекторов Г. В. Также есть запуск тяжёлых ракет с межпланетными спутниками, типа LISA и так далее. Это более 4 миллиард $, не считая других ресурсов.

Thank you

The amount of assumptions turned fact from summaries of theories never proven preached as the most rational doctrine of reality never known is astounding in the modern day scientific mind. We've convinced ourselves of fantasy while claiming it science when in reality its just a religion.

this helps a lot in physics

Amazing. Thank you so much for doing this. Perfection series

The history of astro physics =
"this is how it is " until it isn't .

"He also made the stars. And God set them in the expanse of the heavens to give light on the earth, to rule over the day and over the night, and to separate the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good. And there was evening and there was morning, the fourth day." - Genesis 1:16-19 (ESV)

Naive query , does this hint at stronger g or its expression in the early cosmos .

since gravity is not a force and acceleration is absolute what if there was no acceleration but only a direction in life everything is just a direction no bashing my theories just what if

Quit using squares to represent reality. They do not happen naturally in the world

Maybe those waves encompass the objects top and bottom are some sort of musical frequencies. To form a harmony ten in which each complements the other!

I haven’t understood 70% of what they said in the first 2 minutes but I want to know what it means damn

I have a naive question: The further away we look, the more in the past we look. But there is a limit to how far we can see, because of the limitations of the "observable universe", as things further away can not be seen anymore. Doesn't that mean that we can never see too close to the beginning of time even with a better telescope than James Webb?

What is the purpose of the third particle in the quantum teleportation experiment? From my understanding, wouldn't you just hit Alice with the laser and then check if Alice and Bob give the same measurements, and then hit Bob with the laser and check if they give the same measurements? And if they do, they would be entangled. Is the 3rd particle like a way to check the results?

I can’t wait to finish my degree in physics. As an undergrad. It seems a long way from now for me to be able to do research like this.

Awesome, thank you.

quantum-based telecommunications

Gravitational waves are all over the universe, in outer space, on planet's atmosphere and on water. Detecting gravitational waves on Earth's atmosphere and ocean water is easy and cheap and could be detected by naked eye, still and video cameras and/or seismic detector. But no matter how many times gravitational waves are detected, be it in space, atmosphere and water, it will not solve the conundrum of the TRUE NATURE OF GRAVITY because gravitational waves are not gravity itself but just a perturbation result of gravitation.

The biggest breakthrough in Physics is not Gravitational Waves but the discovery of the TRUE NATURE OF QUANTUM GRAVITY. Quantum Gravity is real. We now have a Quantum Theory of Gravity that is testable, confirmed by empirical reproducible experiments, observations in nature with 7-Sigma lever results and precise and predictive mathematical equations. Check the published papers out on this at the two scientific journals ACADEMIA and REAL TRU NATURE or google the name of the author ROEL REAL ROVIRA.

What a time to be alive while these incredible discoveries are taking place 🙏🏾

This is all so exciting to an old guy like me who earned his physics degree in 1978! Thanks for sharing and explaining the physics so well!

the biggest achievements i guess is the JWT which unearthed many things that we would ever imagine about space , cosmos and the boring theories we used to ratified in our schools.

I hate vocal fry

+++

Is this evidence of a Young Moon? Study, Forces Scientists to Rethink Lunar Dating Techniques October 17 2016 Christian News Update.
A new study shows that craters on the moon form quicker than previously thought which means many features on the lunar surface are not as old as astronomers had predicted. Astronomers at Arizona State University and Cornell University recently set out to measure the formation rate of craters on the moon. To do so, they complied thousands of high- resolution “before and after” images of the moon’s surface captured by NASA’S Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. The amount of time that elapsed between the before and after pictures varied, ranging from 176 to 1,241 days. After collecting the images, the astronomers ran the photographs through computer software that identified any changes between the “before and after” images. The result showed that the moon’s surface as shown in the “after” images is spotted with more than 200 new craters that did not exist when the initial batch of photographs was captured. “From this temporal database, we detected 222 new impact craters,” the astronomers wrote in a paper published by “Nature” on Thursday. The largest craters they identified were about 140 feet in diameter. The scientists were surprised to find this many new impact craters on the moon’s surface because NASA’S Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter launched in 2009. That means that 222 of the craters identified by researches must have formed in the past seven years, which is 33% more than current models predict because they are based on the imaginary “Big Bang” theory. “There are more fresh craters measuring at least 10 meters across than standard calculations would suggest,” wrote “Nature” science journalist Alexandra Witze. “This could mean that some young lunar surfaces may be even younger than thought. “The Big Bang” is merely a theory; it cannot be reproduced in laboratory conditions and is one of many models that could be responsible for the formation of the universe.
The nature of crater-counting is one way to estimate the age of a planetary surface; not just the moon’s surface. Astronomers say that they will need to revisit their dating estimates of the moon’s surface. “Planetary geologists will also need to rethink their understanding of the age of the lunar surface, which depends on counting craters and estimating how long the terrain has been pummeled by impacts”, Witze said. Not only does this study invalidate the idea that craters only form over long eras “millions of years,” but the research suggests that these regular impacts could completely alter the surface of the moon within a timescale of thousands—not millions—of years. “I’m excited by the fact that we can see the regolith evolve and churn—a process that was believed to take hundreds of thousands to millions of years to occur—in images acquired over the past seven years,” one of the researchers told “Space.com.”
Citing various pieces of evidence, Christian scientists reason that the moon’s age is significantly younger than most evolutionary scientists estimate or like to admit. Dr. Jason Lisle, an astrophysicist with the Institute for Creation Research, says the moon “moves about an inch and a half farther away from the earth every year” due to tidal interactions with the earth, which means it is almost certainly not billions of years old! Six thousand years ago the moon would have been about 800 feet closer to the earth; considering the moon is a quarter of a million miles away. This “spiralling away” of the moon is not a problem over the biblical time scale of 6000 years, but if the earth and moon were over 4 billion years old; as the big-bang supporters teach, then we would have big problems. Going back in time the moon would have been touching the earth less than 1.5 billion years ago. True science is about things we can observe, test and study; this is evidence. We have observed multiple crater impacts over seven years on the moon and we have observed that the moon is slowly leaving earth’s orbit by one and a half inches per year. These two observations provide evidence that the moon is young and in turn the earth by implication because the gravitational pull of the moon controls the oceanic tides on the earth.

The sun is losing both mass and energy, approximately 5 feet of hydrogen gas is burned off into helium every hour that is 600 million tons per second. At the sun’s present rate of decline if you go back in time 20 million years ago the sun would have been touching the earth. This earth is not 4.6 billion years old as taught in Science Textbooks neither was there a Big Bang 18-20 billion years ago. All evolution is pure speculation, and all radiometric dating methods for the age of the earth are full of hidden assumptions. In other words it’s all guess work – not science. Theories should not be taught as a fact in the science classrooms. Science is about things we can observe, test and study it is about the search for truth.

The Miracle in the Cell and the End of Evolution

The complex structure of the living cell was unknown in Darwin's day and at the time ascribing life to "coincidences and natural conditions" was thought by evolutionists to be convincing enough. The technology of the 20th century has delved into the tiniest particles of life and has revealed that the cell is the most complex system mankind has ever confronted. Today we know that the cell contains power stations producing the energy to be used by the cell, factories manufacturing the enzymes and hormones essential for life, a databank where all the necessary information about all products to be produced is recorded, complex transportation systems and pipelines for carrying raw materials and products from one place to another, advanced laboratories and refineries for breaking down external raw materials into their useable parts, and specialized cell membrane proteins to control the incoming and outgoing materials. And these constitute only a small part of this incredibly complex system. W. H. Thorpe, an evolutionist scientist, acknowledges that "The most elementary type of cell constitutes a 'mechanism' unimaginably more complex than any machine yet thought up, let alone constructed, by man."105 A cell is so complex that even the high level of technology attained today cannot produce one. No effort to create an artificial cell has ever met with success. Indeed, all attempts to do so have been abandoned. The theory of evolution claims that this system-which mankind, with all the intelligence, knowledge and technology at its disposal, cannot succeed in reproducing-came into existence "by chance" under the conditions of the primordial earth. To give another example, the probability of forming of a cell by chance is about the same as that of producing a perfect copy of a book following an explosion in a printing-house. The English mathematician and astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle made a similar comparison in an interview published in Nature magazine on November 12, 1981. Although an evolutionist himself, Hoyle stated that the chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable to the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein. This means that it is not possible for the cell to have come into being by coincidence, and therefore it must definitely have been "created". One of the basic reasons why the theory of evolution cannot explain how the cell came into existence is the "irreducible complexity" in it. A living cell maintains itself with the harmonious co-operation of many organelles. If only one of these organelles fails to function, the cell cannot remain alive. The cell does not have the chance to wait for unconscious mechanisms like natural selection or mutation to permit it to develop. Thus, the first cell on earth was necessarily a complete cell possessing all the required organelle and functions, and this definitely means that this cell had to have been created.
There are three limitations or stumbling blocks to Darwinian Evolutionary Religion

• There is no evidence that living matter can come from non-living matter
• There are no transitional fossils and no intermediate living organisms between species
• Irreducible complexity as in the single cell and living organisms are made of trillions of cells

I love how the scientists working on gravitational waves who were interviewed seemed to barely contain their excitement at the discoveries made! Their eyes truly sparkle!

NO SOUND IN SPACE. how many times we have to repeat this......

Watched yesterday a great YT video titled „mysteries of light“ and I came to the conclusion that we still know about nothing of foundational physics laws. Let alone about magnetism and gravity.

Gravitational waves were detected before 2023…

Socrates was right. What the actual hell is going on?! Ehh... we'll never know. It's still cool to discover what that means, though.

This information will allow us to improve the manufacture of breakfast cereals at a cost of only several trillion dollars. In sum, who cares? Put our astrophysicists to work on issues that may improve life on Earth. Interesting discoveries are not necessarily valuable.

Can we not try to understand Quantum Vaccum.
Leave it alone

I love that Einstein is still being proved right

Love that I can get up to date physics information like this. The quantum energy teleportation is mind blowing!!!.

This is awesome!

Cosmology is in a state of confusion, just because the Mandela Effect blurs the physicists minds.
"Big Bang" is nonsense theory. Why is it so difficult to discard this outdated idea?
It was obsolete at the moment, the dark energy and inflation of the space was observed.

by any chance are you (the speaker on this video) related to minutephysics? just curious. thanks

Masahiro Hotta seems like a Nobel Prize contestant. Crazy stuff!

I love that Caitlin has a piece of art on the wall behind her that looks like the JWS telescope

❤❤❤

Is it possible galaxies poured out of black holes? Like they're the hawking radiation?

So the people on the ground are surrounded by black holes they can do nothing about, just because we've turned to stone and stuck we might think its oar some but in reality

You don't hope when yr a child, u know, u don't hope to be something, u are going to be something and usually ye parents and community helps you and you give back just as much and strive for more

The time is now, reinvent the rattle

You missed interaction of light with magnetism discovery.

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 recien descubriendo esto... AMOOOOOOOOOOOO

no such thing as smart or took a while or comprehenx or find or etc or not, cepuxuax, think, do, can think, do etc any nmw and any s perfx

Hi I’m new to the channel, do they do one for medicine specifically? I saw that there’s a biology one