Комментарии:
The us really love to add more engines for some reason 😅
ОтветитьI actually saw one of the surviving ones in the air and space muesem in Dayton OH. Really big
ОтветитьOuterspace? What is that exactly? You mean from your science fiction movies?
Upper atmosphere is all humans get. Then you hit the water canopy.
Checkmate (Job 38:10)
~ God
I love how even when they didn’t achieve the contract, American builders would be given an insane proposal like “build us a human who can run a marathon in 1 hour, bench press 900 pounds, and swim the English Channel. All on 1,000 calories a day”. And the manufacturers just said “okie dokes”.
ОтветитьImagine making this plane stealthy too
Ответитьthe us: [making a supersonic bomber]
soviets: This is insane! They really working on that? Comrades, we should do that too!
...
the us: [failed in making a supersonic bomber]
soviets: Oh, they failed... We gonna fail it twice as hard!
The technology is interesting, but also sad to think of the billions spent just coming up with ways to kill people more efficiently.
ОтветитьReally is quite amazing that the B52 has been around for over 70 years now 😮
ОтветитьLooks like it is from a 60s Thunderbirds episode.
ОтветитьA complete and utter failure.
ОтветитьTo think that this was made in the freaking *1950s*!!! What would happen if they attempted something similar today with current technologies? Ooooohhhh...
ОтветитьAnother fact about who was the aggressor during the Cold War
ОтветитьIs it Walt Disney production or....?
ОтветитьBro I think it’s gorgeous, crazy but oh see how aerodynamics shape designas such high speeds.
ОтветитьOnly one question remains, how the hell do you get into it
ОтветитьThe XB-70 was my favorite as a kid.
ОтветитьI realised this might have been an inspiration for Normandy
ОтветитьThe Valkyrie was a beautiful plane, its really sad that once they finished building the prototypes it was obsolete thx to ICBMs.
ОтветитьBEAUTIFUL pre 80's ....aircraft.. this SR 71 and Avro Arrow .. North America's fast and beautiful !!
ОтветитьActually not obsolete, ICBM is a fire and forget weapon. So if you want to start a nuclear war you can use an ICBM and you cannot call back those ICBM if you suddenly think a nuclear war is not what you really want but If you use a Bomber you can call it back.
ОтветитьA supersonic mid-air refuelling aircraft. Wow.
ОтветитьGunny funny
ОтветитьNot practical, no longer flying, never going to be operational. Can't outrun the missile defences.
ОтветитьCould not "outrun anything", as in the thumbnail - but when it first flew there was a SHORT period it could outrun any other airplane.
YF-12, Mig-25, and Mig-31 eventually surpassed it's speed (at least briefly for the MIGs), and MOST anti-air rockets were faster.
The N-1 of the planes. The depiction of aerospace industry's decline. God himself made it fall down (because of wingtips). And guess what? In 2001 samus arans still introduced these murderous wingtips (then had laughs about it).
ОтветитьIn Mother Russia bomber no fail you. YOU FAIL BOMBER!
ОтветитьSome planes are sadly too modern for their time.
ОтветитьIn my opinion its another reason not to like the f-104
ОтветитьThe 50s and 60s must have been an interesting time for aircraft.
ОтветитьSo basically USA and USSR both built useless bombers.
Great competition!
Ngl that music when transitioning to the M-50 Bounder kinda slaps, anyone know what it is?
Ответить🤦🤦♂
recession industry
Tahap kedua perlawanan terbaik.. seronok betul..
ОтветитьCall me crazy, but this plane reminds me to
1) the Concorde (looks similarly by the design)
2) T-Rex (with its tiny arms the plane looks similarly with its tiny front wings)
In 1976 I've seen the XB70 aged 6 years old in reality at Wright Patterson Museum, Dayton and I was impressed at once by the design of that plane! And this impression of design still lasts until today!
ОтветитьThat Nebula ad transition was smooooth
ОтветитьThee most badass plane EVER made , followed up by the SR-71 IN A CLOSE SECOND! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼
ОтветитьBiased against USSR
ОтветитьThis would be cracked in war thunder.
ОтветитьEvery time i looked at those thrusters 🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵😳😳😳😳😳
ОтветитьWhy did the pilots not eject?
ОтветитьThe designers of this thing went: Well Star Trek is pretty popular right now, wanna make a Klingon D-7?
Pentagon: Sure why not.
You start to appreciate how and why the development of rocket technology occured when it did. It's a lot easier to extend the range and increase the speed of an air craft when you don't need to worry about a return trip.
ОтветитьWe would call it the "Eagle Killer," for obvious reasons.
ОтветитьMore than half-a-century old, and still looks strikingly modern.. They actually had the engineering power to get it flying, wow.
ОтветитьEvery US next gen aircraft planning board in the 50s and 60s be like:
Designer: What features do you want for the new {insert_type} design?
USAF: I want a F**KING SPACESHIP.