Комментарии:
Yes it a anti ship missile, but you can't say it was successful, due to the fact that most warships have anti missile ship measures, so unless it can get through all that you can't call is successful.
ОтветитьSampah yg mahal
ОтветитьJust new scraf
ОтветитьUS - Unending Silliness
Ответить2 million dollar missile to disable billion dollar of Chinese naval ship
ОтветитьIf I was Taiwan, Japan and Australia, I’d be buying a 1,000 of those vehicles.
ОтветитьNeed also anti fish misslile!
ОтветитьUS is a decade behind tham
ОтветитьGreat addition to the marines, but they've had these for a couple of years now. 🇺🇸💪
ОтветитьSo where are they going to launch that if the war starts? They have to put that on land, so it has to be delivered to Taiwan before it can be used. China would take it out before it is even able to be used like Russia did to most delivery in Ukraine.
ОтветитьSo basically just a regular anti ship cruise missile, every mayor navy already have those.
Not everyone has hypersonics though...
Oh and uses jam-prone GPS on top of that!!
Too expensive for a mass war. Maybe good for attacking low tech enemy in tiny conflicts
ОтветитьDo you think Chinese Navy is an apple? USA can't even win war in Afghanistan,or in Ukraine etc how could it fight Chinese Navy? You must be day dreaming. Chinese Navy is about 3 times of all NATO battleships combined. China has about 506 new battleships, and 356 submarines. Chinese J20 reached 590, and J31 are being built at. China has many types of jets some can beat any US jets in the sky. All 11 US aircraft carriers won't last more than 1 hour in real war in any oceans if Chinese Navy really attacks them. Chinese anti ship missiles are no joke. They can hit any ships even in US water. Chinese drones are newly built about 200 to 300 times of all NATO combined drones. China is the king of antiship missile, jet, battleship, submarine, and drone production. Just Chinese drones alone can crush all US battleships in 1 or 2 hours. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
ОтветитьAll the destroyers, cruisers or other ships already got their own defense or offensive weapons of similar system. This is USMC toy. They may feel safer for they have a system to call their own to enhance and complement to the Navy's. I'm for it. They look awesome as well potential real killer when comes to Chinese ships and carrier. More is better, just hope they got $$$ to make some as a special delivery to the Chinese when time comes, haha...!!! Semper fidelis 👍🚀💨💥🗽
ОтветитьPut them on first and second island chain. Rip China navy.
Ответитьif you do weight and lenght information, pls include the european standards, thx :) great video!!
ОтветитьSo it can be easily mounted on aircraft and UAS, that's awesome. Why we need to get rid of 2/3 of Marine canon artillery to make space for this makes no sense when one UAS and one radar plt could accomplish the same effect. Marine arty should be focused on the close fight, not what's going on beyond the FSCL, unless you're HIMARS. Also not convinced in the least the NSM has been rigorously tested against common anti-ballistic measures like CWIS, chaff, and/or other spoofing mechanisms.
ОтветитьLOL Leave it to the Americlowns (25 percent of whom can't even locate their own country on an unlabeled map of the world! ) to bring a lorry to a sea-fight.
LOL
🍔🤡
uS weaponry is good only in hype... I can't even win against the poorly equipped Taliban!
ОтветитьHa ha ha I doubt if it can fire a round... I am sure it's blown to pieces before it can be positioned!
ОтветитьTo late to test now, you should already have one ready long time ago, now no more money left for testing and developing
ОтветитьThe US Navy will get its ass kicked by the Chinese…!
ОтветитьHow can America identify an aircraft carrier, when it can't even identify a man or a woman?
ОтветитьI expect a lot more than this with a defense budget of $800 billion per year!! What the HELL are getting for us money?
ОтветитьThey can sink you Hundreds of miles away and there is nothing you can do about it.
ОтветитьLets see how well it works out against russias jamming capabilities
ОтветитьJust this title alone is silly.. really do we need actual names of weapons designed with the countries name attached to it. If that isn't Cold War thinking/politics/proganda i don't know what is.
ОтветитьBest choice "Stay away 0f the S0uth Ch1na Sea" 🎉
ОтветитьDoes anyone here believe America is willing to go to war with China over Taiwan?
America might need to think 7 times before trying to die for Taiwan. China would literally flatten Taiwan in three days max. All of Taiwan military infrastructure and logistics have been marked already.
China will need to be careful, not to stack Navy warship and make them venerable to the attack.😂
I am sure China can handle a few missiles.
@....... 🗣️💨💨Doesn't work why ???? FAKE 👋
ОтветитьWhat a waste of time and money
China is developing in accelerated rate while USA just made misdiles upon misdiles to make their citizens suffer homeless and shitting in pavements
I suspect they're pronouncing it "NEMESIS", not "N-MESIS"
ОтветитьInstead of developing.. New agricultural technology.. war mongerer are developing death machines
ОтветитьThe only trouble spots in the western world are Tiawan and Ukraine, it's a system both countries could use:)
ОтветитьPark a few of those missiles atop Japan's helicopter carriers or other ships. Voila! Instant anti-ship capability.
ОтветитьMore Biden's Tin Can Crap - ha-ha-ha-ha - just have to look at the Stuff he gave Zelenskyy - ha-ha-ha !!!!
ОтветитьThat is a very bad new for communist china navy that have a lot of ### quantities of ship but NOT quality . Sorry communist china go ahead and make a copy, stealing military tech from other as much as you can but the really quality and the truth is on the battlefield, like western weapons defeated Russian military war machine in the battlefield of Ukraine.
ОтветитьI think the USA is misguided in thinking that China is going to invade with hundreds of ships. No, if China decides to hit Taiwan it will saturate the island with a massive wave of rocket/missile/drone/cyber attacks that will knock out airports, highways, military bases, storage facilities, command and control centers and power stations. Then they will blockade the island with ships and aircraft and the island will starve and surrender within 30 days. The Chinese will never get their feet wet.
ОтветитьThere is an old adage, if it looks right, it generally is. This system looks like a hurried hash up. I don’t see it being a success. It’s range isn’t that great. It’s probably not too hard to intercept. It looks seriously weak and wobbly too.
Ответитьthey wish they were 😂
ОтветитьYawns, unless you plan on mass producing these and placing them on the shores of Taiwan they'll be useless. Even then Chinese H/JP-11 CiWS and HQ-10 will shoot them out of the sky then launch cruise missiles on Guam and Taiwan, roll credits, game over, yet another loss.
ОтветитьCanada has integrated 2 quad launchers for Naval Strike Missile along with Hypersonic missile launchers in it's upcoming frigate.
ОтветитьI like the steel 4 ton rod guided down from 70.000 feet. Go in and out of the chinese ship. Now get 5 of them hitting the ships engine room. All stop all bad.
ОтветитьHope it has a matter/antimatter warhead.
ОтветитьThe Russians have a missile, if you see it, it's too late 😅
ОтветитьChina already has their answer to sink US Navy's carrier fleets.
ОтветитьRBS15 Gungnir is a game changer 😊
Ответитьmilitary industrial complex at work
Ответить