Detection of Strange Star Clusters Shortly After the Big Bang and Why It's Important

Detection of Strange Star Clusters Shortly After the Big Bang and Why It's Important

Anton Petrov

3 недели назад

63,387 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@jero4059
@jero4059 - 23.07.2024 03:06

The most mind-boggling thing to me is that community of physicists and astronomers still can't confess that their standard model is not standard any more.

Ответить
@elijahg1797
@elijahg1797 - 18.07.2024 13:02

they look like what I imagine a white hole would look like

Ответить
@2ndEarth
@2ndEarth - 17.07.2024 18:01

Those should be 2:3 ratio, they area a byproduct of an iterative universe in it’s imaginary plane - I have the formula if you want, it iterates a circle and creates linear attractors like you see in the stars

Ответить
@andrewfarrar741
@andrewfarrar741 - 16.07.2024 03:41

Thank you, kindly.

Ответить
@blaster42008
@blaster42008 - 14.07.2024 13:13

the universe is alive, we dont live long enough to see it move. we are like fruit flies with a 30 day lifespan and the universe takes 10000 of our years to have a heart beat. -high thoughts

Ответить
@thomasgeorgecastleberry6918
@thomasgeorgecastleberry6918 - 13.07.2024 20:02

A line Galaxy, what next? Probably the edge of a Galaxy Disk, probably everything else concerning this line galaxy is bunk!.

Ответить
@DCGreenZone
@DCGreenZone - 13.07.2024 17:58

Mysterious

Ответить
@bishopwhite1822
@bishopwhite1822 - 13.07.2024 16:28

So many out there who careers depend on the big bang, they will rewrite everything else before they admit it's clearly wrong.

Ответить
@GrimJerr
@GrimJerr - 13.07.2024 13:20

The James Webb telescope is teaching us, take everything you thought you knew about space and expect something different.

Ответить
@NicholasNerios
@NicholasNerios - 13.07.2024 11:53

What will we see when there's a moon telescope on the dark side? One negative is during solar eclipse when the sun beats down on the station.

Ответить
@michaelneal6589
@michaelneal6589 - 13.07.2024 11:25

Thanks Anto

Ответить
@stevesloan6775
@stevesloan6775 - 13.07.2024 08:46

Imagine a big bang that acted like cavitation, on a 5D fractal system.

And here we are! 😂

Ответить
@PrometheusZandski
@PrometheusZandski - 13.07.2024 01:38

I'm glad you pointing out how radically different the universe was before and just after reionization. The universe was much smaller, denser and hotter at this time. At the time of reionization, the average temperature of the universe was 3000 K, as opposed to 4 K today. The radius was only 43 million light years, as opposed to our 46 BILLION light years today. This makes the early universe over a billion times more dense. So far, our assumptions about star and galactic formation have been mostly wrong during this period of time.

Ответить
@helmeteye
@helmeteye - 13.07.2024 01:36

When will we be able to see reflections. For instance, will we ever see a reflection of our own Galaxy coming back to us after light years?

Ответить
@tothally
@tothally - 13.07.2024 01:11

Hydrogen gas is pretty transparent why to reionize it?

Ответить
@mossig
@mossig - 13.07.2024 00:41

Those clusters take up a tiny area with vast clear areas around. So hardly they could clear up space so far away from them clusters. Just more creationism.

Ответить
@yomogami4561
@yomogami4561 - 13.07.2024 00:39

thanks for the information anton and looking forward to more updates

Ответить
@jsEMCsquared
@jsEMCsquared - 12.07.2024 23:24

Time itself was slowed down to the point that in our nanosecond, there might be billions of years inside of it.

Ответить
@esecallum
@esecallum - 12.07.2024 23:10

Ah, the audacious astronomers, those celestial maestros who, in their cosmic symphony, have now composed a sonata of avoidance for the electric and plasma models of the universe. Their fear of these alternatives has grown so profound that they've resorted to verbal contortions, performing linguistic ballets to divert attention from the cosmic outcast – plasma.
Enter the grand illusion: once-humble plasma filaments, those wisps of ionized matter, have now ascended to the lofty title of "objects." Yes, you heard it right – objects. Because, naturally, uttering the P-word might provoke a cosmic uprising, shaking the very foundations of astronomical dogma.

It's as if astronomers are participants in a cosmic charades game, tactfully replacing "plasma" with the ambiguous "objects," hoping that the cosmic audience won't catch on. "Look over here at these mysterious objects," they declare, with a conspiratorial wink, trying desperately to divert attention from the heretical idea that perhaps, just perhaps, electricity plays a starring role in the cosmic drama.

But why the cosmic shyness, esteemed astronomers? Is it the terror of challenging established doctrines, the apprehension of acknowledging that the universe might be a bit more electrically charged than the textbooks dictate? Or is it simply easier to conjure cosmic charlatanry, renaming plasma currents as elusive "objects" and hoping no one will notice?

And now, a cosmic twist in this grand performance: astronomers, driven by an apparent disdain for scientific credibility, have birthed a menagerie of mythical entities from the cosmic void – dark photons, dark ions, dark sectors, and dark voids. It's as if they're pulling these cosmic rabbits out of a hat, or perhaps from a location less glamorous.

In this cosmic masquerade, astronomers, once heralded as seekers of truth, now perform linguistic acrobatics to sidestep inconvenient words. It's like discussing the solar system without whispering the word "Sun," an act of linguistic gymnastics that distorts the very essence of scientific inquiry.

So here's a cosmic encore for these linguistic illusionists, seamlessly conjuring "dark" entities from the cosmic shadows. The theater of astronomy may be dimming, but the spectacle of linguistic escapades continues, skillfully performed under the watchful eyes of the old guard. Bravo, for turning the pursuit of knowledge into a cosmic vaudeville act, complete with dark photons and fantastical wordplay.

Ответить
@luipaardprint
@luipaardprint - 12.07.2024 22:47

Would these be the elusive population III stars then?

Ответить
@barryfrancispaul8919
@barryfrancispaul8919 - 12.07.2024 22:30

The BIG BANG is a THEORY thought up in a bar by two students, do you know what a theory is, it is something unproven, to all those still clinging unto 13.8 million, wise up the JWT has proven otherwise, stop behaving like the catholic church in the 16 century when they imprisoned Galileo Galilei for daring to prove the earth rotates around the sun.

Ответить
@MursaleenMomin
@MursaleenMomin - 12.07.2024 21:45

More merchandise please ❤

Ответить
@mykota2417
@mykota2417 - 12.07.2024 21:38

Jwst: everything is strange and new! Wait till 1st intergalactic space robots are out there...

Ответить
@ogedeh
@ogedeh - 12.07.2024 21:28

Nobody cares about space anymore, the world is burning

Ответить
@DVDVDi
@DVDVDi - 12.07.2024 21:22

Every viedo pretending to be about cosmic SCP 😊

Ответить
@DAM-ob5ib
@DAM-ob5ib - 12.07.2024 21:21

Are black holes at the centre of them?

Ответить
@NeXaSLvL
@NeXaSLvL - 12.07.2024 20:47

Cosmic Gems Arc sounds like a sonic the hedgehog game

Ответить
@awedelen1
@awedelen1 - 12.07.2024 20:46

😎

Ответить
@PerfektFilms
@PerfektFilms - 12.07.2024 20:42

Sorry, but can someone explain to me: if I understood correctly, these have the mass of central black holes, but are way smaller in diameter.....why are they not black holes? o.O

Ответить
@user-xq8mk5qu8n
@user-xq8mk5qu8n - 12.07.2024 20:29

Sonic shock wave distribution, before matter dispersed and vacuum asserted itself.

Ответить
@johnsimon2988
@johnsimon2988 - 12.07.2024 19:48

Getting real, the entire universe originated suddenly from a microscopic beyond dense position in space/time? Doubtful. If theory doesn't know how THAT happened, why are scientists surprised at finding "unexpected" structures when said regions can finally be visualized? Just solve it already! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Ответить
@djdrack4681
@djdrack4681 - 12.07.2024 18:57

Inflation/Reionization doesn't add up. The theory behind it is worse than the generalization Einstein et al gave to BOTH gravity/time.
Watch such theories get completely disproven in the coming few decades. All the evidence is out there; but research institutes are still clinging to Standard Model and G/S Relativity as though it were a lifeboat. (which for their inability to think critically, I suppose it is).

Ответить
@Tomer-qx1ij
@Tomer-qx1ij - 12.07.2024 18:56

Maybe the universe is much,
much older than we think

Ответить
@kantanlabs3859
@kantanlabs3859 - 12.07.2024 18:46

These clusters contain first generation stars that were huge and short lived. Besides, these stars were very close to one another moving in probably quite dense hydrogen medium that might have damped their relative velocities. So that I wonder if we do not simply observe the seeds of the huge primordial black holes!

Ответить
@jackthetford7558
@jackthetford7558 - 12.07.2024 18:09

The smile at the end is a game changer

Ответить
@TheBoxBand
@TheBoxBand - 12.07.2024 17:48

Hmmm, star party.

Ответить
@PhilW222
@PhilW222 - 12.07.2024 17:43

Yet another absolutely fascinating episode!

Ответить
@donaldhenderson9918
@donaldhenderson9918 - 12.07.2024 16:18

Thank you Anton! Always interesting!❤

Ответить
@charlesjmouse
@charlesjmouse - 12.07.2024 15:54

One wonders if some globular clusters are 'population 0' remnants.
If there objects are 'proto globular clusters', that may fit such a suspicion.

Ответить
@ivanlam1304
@ivanlam1304 - 12.07.2024 15:43

When scientists say that they don't know how Globular clusters formed what they are saying is that they can't imagine the set of circumstances that give the end result of the distribution and dynamic behaviour of the star system we observe

Ответить
@KaliFissure
@KaliFissure - 12.07.2024 15:41

Why aren't very early galaxies getting, visual arc, larger?

According to theory the universe was significantly smaller 13 billion years ago and so any given galaxy was PROPORTIONALLY larger and so they, since we are looking into pay, should be taking up MORE visual arc.

Ответить
@theostickle2604
@theostickle2604 - 12.07.2024 15:32

Thank you.
I would like to hear more about this as information becomes available please.
All they have it seems are some single pixil and smaller dots and assumption. As far back as that image gose it is more likely those are early short lived mega-stars and super giant stars.

Ответить
@gehardcev
@gehardcev - 12.07.2024 15:24

MANTAP 👍🌟

Ответить
@Jacob-fv6co
@Jacob-fv6co - 12.07.2024 15:09

Wouldn't these have to be Population 3 stars if they formed so soon after the Big Bang?

Ответить
@Care2WorldBuild
@Care2WorldBuild - 12.07.2024 15:00

Since we can graphically represent gravitational lensing as we see in some animations, it seems we may be able to calculate the parameters of the lensing from observations and reverse it to actually see the object. Is there a way you can do a review of that possibility?

Ответить
@grepenoop
@grepenoop - 12.07.2024 14:58

Praise JWST 🙏

Ответить
@setlik3gaming80
@setlik3gaming80 - 12.07.2024 14:57

👍🖖🏽

Ответить
@mimidhof2179
@mimidhof2179 - 12.07.2024 14:46

Anton I really like the content and regularity at which you deliver this great content, but I think you should more precisely tag the picture of space when they are real image and illustration because I feel fooled at some moment when I see the artistic image coming back out of context.
I think you shoul rather be constanly precise about what we see. The choice of making it apealing is correct, the choice to make it confusing isn't. Just put in a corner "illustration" when it is the case... sometimes it is clearly evident but sometimes not at all. good work anyway. Thank you

Ответить
@zhavlan1258
@zhavlan1258 - 12.07.2024 14:29

Let me suggest for schoolchildren and students to measure the Universe, dark energy, black holes, etc. two devices “laser tape measure with fixed fixation at 1,000,000 meters” and “Michelson-Morley HYBRID Gyroscope”
you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,...
I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 250000 (In a laser tape measure, the length of the optical fiber is fixed at 1000000 ) meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 84/84/84 cm, and the weight is 24 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions.
Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven:
Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum.
(We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta) The result is a «theory of everything» in a simple teaching device and a new tape measure for measuring the universe.

Ответить
@emanemanrus5835
@emanemanrus5835 - 12.07.2024 14:28

anyone noticed JWT looks like a giant old gramphone?

Ответить