Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro lens review

Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro lens review

Christopher Frost

1 год назад

67,385 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

Ghalib's World
Ghalib's World - 20.08.2023 17:51

Looking for the same review in Canon R10.

Ответить
Sergey Sergeev
Sergey Sergeev - 01.08.2023 19:04

👍 for "bla bla bla".

Ответить
Theo Ell
Theo Ell - 05.07.2023 00:35

Does the 24mm has the same problem like 35mm that goes to the macro mode in video, when there isn't any other point to focus

Ответить
Partha Bhattacharya
Partha Bhattacharya - 30.06.2023 02:42

Im subscribing because he said "blah blah nlah"

Ответить
Christof
Christof - 04.05.2023 14:33

This lens is becoming my favorite lens right now. 24mm on my R7 is around 38mm FF equivalent and for me at least, the field of view is perfect as a travel/sight seeing lens.
It´s quite shocking how similar the image quality is compared to the ef-s 24mm 2.8 on the R7.

Ответить
Andrew Phillips
Andrew Phillips - 08.04.2023 14:26

Great review, thank you!
How does the RF24 compare to the RF24-70 2.8 when both @ 24mm and 2.8?

Ответить
Joo Yoon Chung
Joo Yoon Chung - 30.03.2023 15:49

For the price, the lens appears to be … disappointing. I’d say a fair price would be around $400 at most.

Ответить
Josie Kat
Josie Kat - 23.01.2023 22:34

How does it it compare to Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM ?

Ответить
The SuperBike Tour
The SuperBike Tour - 07.01.2023 14:49

Thing with f1.8 is people don't shoot for corner to corner sharpeners as that aperture so it does really matter if it's soft then

Ответить
Douglas McLain Berdeaux
Douglas McLain Berdeaux - 03.12.2022 07:21

Thank you for making these videos and telling us these are trash before we waste our money! I really appreciate that! I was just about to buy this too! You're the best!

Ответить
KrisAK
KrisAK - 22.11.2022 21:06

Mr. Frost, do you think the 24 is quieter to focus than is the 35? I had the 35 but sold it, partly due to the noise, and am hoping Canon would work that out in future lenses (like this one, perhaps?)

Ответить
Toam
Toam - 17.11.2022 17:47

I love seeing you test on an R7 aswell as an R5. Canons APSC Lineup is lacking pretty much anything except for the entry level Superzoom, which is why buying FF equipment is the way to go right now if you don't want to go EF adapted.

Ответить
ricardo nuñez
ricardo nuñez - 13.11.2022 06:38

Todo bien con las reviews, las veo siempre.. pero se llaman Malvinas, y son Argentinas

Ответить
Al J Vásquez
Al J Vásquez - 09.11.2022 01:10

Canon locked 3rd party lenses because they know damn well that Sigma could come up with a lens better than this one for 300 or 350$

Ответить
Ryan Hamilton
Ryan Hamilton - 02.11.2022 06:18

This is why Canon won't allow for third party lenses. They have a list of really interesting lenses that will do a lot to compel buyers to enter the Canon RF system.

Ответить
Manukello
Manukello - 31.10.2022 22:52

disgusting distortion

Ответить
Sean Tester
Sean Tester - 31.10.2022 18:18

"Liberation" of the Falkland islands 😂😂😂 English humor

Ответить
WorldScale Photography Guy Rotenberg
WorldScale Photography Guy Rotenberg - 29.10.2022 18:38

Yayyy been waiting for this! :) You inspired me to do my own review for this lens, can't wait to see your conclusions, see how they are compared to mine.

Ответить