Комментарии:
Fun Fact. As a romanian who doesn't hold a grudge on the native romanian-hungarian conflict, but more wants to explore the twist and turns of history. The proposal for a romanian monarch to be king over Hungary and Romanian land, after the 1919 war between the two countries came from the actual Hungarian politicians at that time, although baffling at first, the proposal was made associated with the proposal of moving the king's throne to Budapest. Although a flattering gesture at first, it was a smart proposal from hungarian politicians, that with this move they insured a certain influence over the romanian king, subsequently over the whole kingdom of Romania and hungarian territories combined. It's a good example of how politics can influence a bad turnout of a war and thus representing a lesson for future decisions.
ОтветитьIf Admiral Miklos Horthy became king, he would be called Miklos I. Horthy, right?
ОтветитьHungarians were not the majority in Transylvania. Not even close
ОтветитьTransylvania was ethnic majority romanian💀, get ur information right blud
ОтветитьThe last king, Charles IV, reigned from 1916 to 1918. He died in 1922.
His first born son was Otto. Had he become king upon the death of his father and for the rest of his life, he would've reigned as Otto II for 87 years, for he only died in 2009.
I 'met' him when I was a toddler, in 1991.
Imagine if Hungary and Romania were united today. Or Hungary as part of the Commonwealth. They would be amazing. :D
ОтветитьHungary needs its old territories back
And then some East Hungarian leader should be installed as its king
Ah yes, The Dom of Hungary
ОтветитьBecause there was no King in Mongolian Culture..
ОтветитьGreat video! The only problem is that Transylvania has always had a romanian majority, which gave Romania a strong claim to the land, which was used by queen Mary in negotiating with french prime minister Clemenceau for the full annexation of the region.
ОтветитьLove the detail whenever the UK is shown, Ireland is just on fire
ОтветитьIt mostly had, but when it didn't it had an emperor.
ОтветитьMe normally: kings are an outdated tradition that needs to be gradually phased out
Me when a Romanian steals my tires: HORTHY MIKLOS KATONAJA VAGYOK, LEGSZEBB KATONAJAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Wonderful! Thanks!
ОтветитьHow was Transilvania majoritary hungarian? It never was.
ОтветитьCrikey, what utter rubbish!! Even for a Brit this is baaaad.
ОтветитьThank you for your efforts on your videos I enjoy each one that you produce or create excellent work
ОтветитьA szent korona = Nagy Magyarország feltámadását jelképezi.
Kossuth-címer + szent korona = A Harmadik Magyar Köztársaság címere. Horthy Miklós nem akart király lenni, csak vissza akarta hozni a Történelmi Magyarországot.
Hungary did not invade Romania in 1919, in fact, Romania invaded Hungary in 1918, as Transylvania wasn't ceded until 1920. Thus, showing the current borders of Hungary for events before the Treaty of Trianon in June 1920 is not factual.
ОтветитьSoon will have 😉
ОтветитьBecause no king goes Hungary with all the wealth they have
ОтветитьCharles the fourth died in Spanish flu. And because the Austrians taked our crown and they lost it we have no chance to be a kingdom again.
ОтветитьPoor Charles.
ОтветитьThe majority of Transylvania's population is not Hungarian, in fact Hungarians make up barely 15% of Transylvania's population.
ОтветитьDo one on the Acadians.
ОтветитьGreat video, but I noticed a couple of mistakes:
1. Romania occupied Budapest in the 1919 war, your map shows as they only occupied the territories up until Tisza river
2. Transylvania had a majority romanian population, not hungarian
Finally something I didn’t know.
ОтветитьAll this time I thought Horthy was the king of hungry. Nice to learn something new.
ОтветитьJust here for the spinning plates!!!
ОтветитьWhaaat?! 😮
ОтветитьThis is what happens when you give one guy unlimited power expecting him to not want it anymore because question mark.
ОтветитьEurope has had many kings without a kingdom (and still has, I believe), but kingdom without a king, that's something special.
ОтветитьYou can't even do proper research. Hungarians were NEVER majority in Transilvanya
ОтветитьThe other reason that Horthy did not accept the throne was that he was loyal to the Habsburgs.
ОтветитьYou are wrong on saying that Transilvania has Hungarians as majority of population.
ОтветитьWhat about King Ottokar in Tin Tin?
ОтветитьHorthy was our king
He just didnt call himself a king but for us he is king
The Kingdom of Hungary did have a King... it was bl. Charles.
The very premise of the video is wrong.
Soviet Hungary also invaded Czechoslovakia, but was repulsed back.
ОтветитьTransylvania was majority romanian during the reign of Ferdinand.
ОтветитьHere i am HunGeri the first on this name
On your knees foolish mortals
I’m not doing it 😂😂😂😂
ОтветитьWhy didnt Hungary have a king after ww2?
Because he would have had less power then the regiant.